Warning to Christians: Totally Refuse COVID Vaccines
- Thread starter Nehemiah6
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
As I said, you are very disinformed about our partysystem.
Then you would know that she has not the power to reign as in your country the president. She has to follow the Party.
In Germany it is CDU/ CSU. All other Partys are much more worse in their morals and in the view of Christian values. Merkel will leave in September. I cant see that after her it will get better. ( like everywhere)
Btw, I love no partysystem. Its depend how much this system follow the word of God.
It seems in your country its similar difficult to elect the right partysystem.
Then you would know that she has not the power to reign as in your country the president. She has to follow the Party.
In Germany it is CDU/ CSU. All other Partys are much more worse in their morals and in the view of Christian values. Merkel will leave in September. I cant see that after her it will get better. ( like everywhere)
Btw, I love no partysystem. Its depend how much this system follow the word of God.
It seems in your country its similar difficult to elect the right partysystem.
-
1
- Show all
I do, you should, then you might receive His gift of discernment. 
If you belong to Jesus Christ you should show it. Out of your responses I cant see it.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
I am quoting from an article which explains how this works. It is called "reverse transcription" or "retro-integration".
Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make…
A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates. The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”
Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens. According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”
The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.
In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny. In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”
Reverse transcription
As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus. Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.” The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.
The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility [Note: this is covered in another paper quoted below] and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.” In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”
Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”
Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”
More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”...
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/science-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna/
Here is the paper which shows that prion disease is a serious issue with mRNA vaccines: "COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease"
"...RNA based vaccines offers special risks of inducing specific adverse events. One such potential adverse event is prion based diseases caused by activation of intrinsic proteins to form prions. A wealth of knowledge has been published on a class of RNA binding proteins shown to participating in causing a number of neurological diseases including Alzheimer’s disease and ALS. TDP-43 and FUS are among the best studied of these proteins [2]...."
...There are many other potential adverse events that can be induced by the novel RNA based vaccines against COVID-19. The vaccine places a novel molecule, spike protein, in/on the surface of host cells. This spike protein is a potential receptor for another possibly novel infectious agent. If those who argue that the COVID-19 is actually a bioweapon are correct, then a second potentially more dangerous virus may be released that binds spike protein found on the host cells of vaccine recipients. Data is not publicly available to provide information on how long the vaccine RNA is translated in the vaccine recipient and how long after translation the spike protein will be present in the recipient’s cells...
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make…
A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates. The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”
Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens. According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”
The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.
In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny. In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”
Reverse transcription
As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus. Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.” The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.
The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility [Note: this is covered in another paper quoted below] and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.” In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”
Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”
Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”
More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”...
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/science-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna/
Here is the paper which shows that prion disease is a serious issue with mRNA vaccines: "COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease"
"...RNA based vaccines offers special risks of inducing specific adverse events. One such potential adverse event is prion based diseases caused by activation of intrinsic proteins to form prions. A wealth of knowledge has been published on a class of RNA binding proteins shown to participating in causing a number of neurological diseases including Alzheimer’s disease and ALS. TDP-43 and FUS are among the best studied of these proteins [2]...."
...There are many other potential adverse events that can be induced by the novel RNA based vaccines against COVID-19. The vaccine places a novel molecule, spike protein, in/on the surface of host cells. This spike protein is a potential receptor for another possibly novel infectious agent. If those who argue that the COVID-19 is actually a bioweapon are correct, then a second potentially more dangerous virus may be released that binds spike protein found on the host cells of vaccine recipients. Data is not publicly available to provide information on how long the vaccine RNA is translated in the vaccine recipient and how long after translation the spike protein will be present in the recipient’s cells...
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
-
3
-
1
- Show all
New UK Study: People Who Have Been Vaccinated Make Up 47% of New COVID Cases
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...mber-people-falling-ill-virus-day-FALLEN.html
Then with a straight face this reporter writes: "This does not mean the jabs do not work." Then the professor working on this study makes an even more stupid remark: "the shift in trend was likely because the virus was 'running out' of non-jabbed Britons to infect" . Can you believe such nonsense being published?
A WORD OF CAUTION: YOU CANNOT TAKE ANY OF THE DATA IN THIS STUDY AT FACE VALUE. IF THEY ARE STILL USING THE FAULTY PCR TEST AS BEFORE, AND STILL MISUSING THE TERM "CASE" (FOR A FALSE POSITIVE PCR TEST) THEN NONE OF THOSE GRAPHS AND CHARTS HAVE ANY VALUE.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...mber-people-falling-ill-virus-day-FALLEN.html
Then with a straight face this reporter writes: "This does not mean the jabs do not work." Then the professor working on this study makes an even more stupid remark: "the shift in trend was likely because the virus was 'running out' of non-jabbed Britons to infect" . Can you believe such nonsense being published?
A WORD OF CAUTION: YOU CANNOT TAKE ANY OF THE DATA IN THIS STUDY AT FACE VALUE. IF THEY ARE STILL USING THE FAULTY PCR TEST AS BEFORE, AND STILL MISUSING THE TERM "CASE" (FOR A FALSE POSITIVE PCR TEST) THEN NONE OF THOSE GRAPHS AND CHARTS HAVE ANY VALUE.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
10,991 Post-Vax Deaths Reported To CDC, & FDA New J&J Warning
Of the 10,991 deaths reported as of July 9, 22% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 24 hours and 37% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
https://principia-scientific.com/10991-post-vax-deaths-reported-to-cdc-fda-new-jj-warning/
Of the 10,991 deaths reported as of July 9, 22% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 24 hours and 37% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
https://principia-scientific.com/10991-post-vax-deaths-reported-to-cdc-fda-new-jj-warning/
Well, in case of doctors, I work since more then 25 years in hospital and met a lot of doctors. They all are humans and cooking with water. And I met not less doctors which are fully convinced to be right, even when they are not.
Of course someone can be convinced that the vaccines kill 65% of the vaccined people, but the he should be honest to confess that there is no Single proof for this. And not sell it as an fact und spread not nessassary fear and panic. Then normally the vaccine help to survive the virus.
Of course someone can be convinced that the vaccines kill 65% of the vaccined people, but the he should be honest to confess that there is no Single proof for this. And not sell it as an fact und spread not nessassary fear and panic. Then normally the vaccine help to survive the virus.
-
1
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Facebook Official: Biden Using Us as 'Scapegoat' for Vaccine Failures
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/facebook-covid-19-misinformation-vaccination/2021/07/17/id/1028980/
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/facebook-covid-19-misinformation-vaccination/2021/07/17/id/1028980/
-
1
- Show all
Know why? Because the coronavirus class of viruses is not new... at all. 99% of the world already has herd immunity to it. Covid-19 is no exception to the herd immunity. Of course, the survival rate for any bacterium or virus is never 100%.
The whole point of the vaccine is money, power, control.
The whole point of the vaccine is money, power, control.
-
3
-
1
-
1
- Show all
K
Again, you follow your own guidance on this. I'm not an anti-vax person. I just believe there needs to be more time before we know what the side effects are. I don't believe the doctors on this issue. I don't believe that masks prevent anything. My doctor friend confirmed it to me when he said that all the medical professionals in the area met with the local health dept. They said that the N95 mask is the only mask that prevents this virus. So my doctor friend asked why they were mandating masks if they did no good, they said it stops the panic in people and makes them feel they are doing something to help. It's a lie. Took me a couple months to figure it out for myself. I stopped wearing the mask over a year ago. I don't intend to start again. Doctors, scientists (so called) and gov't lost what little faith I had in them in the first place. Just remember, it was the medical professionals, doctors/nurses and scientists that murdered 6 million Jews. Be careful who you put your trust in.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
Well, masks reduce the spreading range and combined with distance it helped. Of course it protect not to get the virus. But it reduce the ability to get it.
The numbers of flu in germany last year went very down. Why ? wearing mask, distance, washing hands.
To say it is for nothing, then why during operation the personal is wearing masks?
The only protection against a virus, doesnt matter whats Name, is to be Immun. But the most people are not. So a vaccine is the only way to reach the Stadium of immunity. ( Sadly not all, but you dont know before, can manage the vaccine.)
I ask wether the same people who shouts against vaccine would do it,if Corona had the same letality like the ebola virus.
Behind these doctors was a nazi regime.
Behind the much more millions of killed Babys is not a nazi Regime. ( It is not only the Bad german guy) You find this people in every country.
In this I agree with you.
I also agree with you there are no longtime studys about the vaccine. Also nobody knows in which more variants the virus will turn in Future.
To vaccine against flu they Mix 3 or 4 different virustribes and hope one of them will hit the virus.
I dont trust goverments also not the german one, but I also dont believe everything what even Christians claiming. Often it is pure speculation. Like with this claiming that 65% of the vaccined people will die because of the vaccine.
The numbers of flu in germany last year went very down. Why ? wearing mask, distance, washing hands.
To say it is for nothing, then why during operation the personal is wearing masks?
The only protection against a virus, doesnt matter whats Name, is to be Immun. But the most people are not. So a vaccine is the only way to reach the Stadium of immunity. ( Sadly not all, but you dont know before, can manage the vaccine.)
I ask wether the same people who shouts against vaccine would do it,if Corona had the same letality like the ebola virus.
Behind these doctors was a nazi regime.
Behind the much more millions of killed Babys is not a nazi Regime. ( It is not only the Bad german guy) You find this people in every country.
In this I agree with you.
I also agree with you there are no longtime studys about the vaccine. Also nobody knows in which more variants the virus will turn in Future.
To vaccine against flu they Mix 3 or 4 different virustribes and hope one of them will hit the virus.
I dont trust goverments also not the german one, but I also dont believe everything what even Christians claiming. Often it is pure speculation. Like with this claiming that 65% of the vaccined people will die because of the vaccine.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
- Status