Bible "versions"?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dino246 said:
You have never been convinced that the KJV is in error. You refuse to consider the possibility and so insulate yourself from the evidence.
Click to expand...
I've spent the majority of my years as a Christian believing the KjV was in error compared to the modern translations . So actually its quite the turn a round ,for me .
 
throughfaith said:
I've spent the majority of my years as a Christian believing the KjV was in error compared to the modern translations . So actually its quite the turn a round ,for me .
Click to expand...
Again, I respect your choice. However, you have not shared anything that looks like good evidence for your choice. It appears that you just noticed that there were differences; you haven't yet identified those differences or explained how you came to believe that one was superior to others.
 
Chester said:
The one standard to go by is the original autographs - that is what God gave under inspiration. If man chooses one translation as the standard, then man becomes the final authority on what God said. I am not willing to do that.
Click to expand...

Too bad they’re gone. Let’s not put more emphasis on the originals than God. If God thought we needed the originals He would have preserved them for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeanM and throughfaith
Dino246 said:
Again, I respect your choice. However, you have not shared anything that looks like good evidence for your choice. It appears that you just noticed that there were differences; you haven't yet identified those differences or explained how you came to believe that one was superior to others.
Click to expand...
Give it a try .
 
Dino246 said:
You go with "the theologians" from the 17th century instead of those from the 20th century. There is no fundamental difference in that regard.
Click to expand...

Nope my friend, my trust is in the Lord’s promise to preserve His words.
 
John146 said:
Too bad they’re gone. Let’s not put more emphasis on the originals than God. If God thought we needed the originals He would have preserved them for us.
Click to expand...

No, it is not too bad they are gone. It is not the printed text that needs to be worshipped. It is the message that God wants to communicate to our hearts that is imperative. Let's not put more emphasis on the KJV than God does (in fact, there is not a word in the Bible directly about the KJV version). If God thought the KJV was his inspired text he would have said so through the writers.
 
Dino246 said:
You have never been convinced that the KJV is in error. You refuse to consider the possibility and so insulate yourself from the evidence.
Click to expand...

And you have never been convinced that you can hold God’s word in your hand.
 
JerryInBoston said:
All of the Greek manuscripts use the word πάσχα (pascha) 29 times, which is translated 28 times in the KJV as Passover. The KJV mistranslated πάσχα (pascha) one time in Acts 12:4 as Easter, which is a word that was not in use until the 11th or 12th century.

Why do you think the KJV translators discarded God's word "pascha" for something else?
Click to expand...
I would say they used Easter because people could relate to Easter as opposed to passover and understand when it happened.
 
DeanM said:
I would say they used Easter because people could relate to Easter as opposed to passover and understand when it happened.
Click to expand...

Jesus fulfilled the Passover on the cross. There’s no need to celebrate the Passover any longer for Easter is the Passover revealed.
 
John146 said:
Jesus fulfilled the Passover on the cross. There’s no need to celebrate the Passover any longer for Easter is the Passover revealed.
Click to expand...
My point was, 17th century english speaking people could relate to easter moreso than passover as to the timeline.
 
John146 said:
I have many times and then people come back with, “well, no major doctrines are changed”...🤦‍♂️
Click to expand...
The problem is that you have a double standard. You present issues that confirm your belief, but you reject outright the issues that contradict it. You don't operate with integrity on this matter.
 
Dino246 said:
As is mine.
Click to expand...

There is truth to be known in Luke 10:1. Did the Lord send out 70 or 72 as the new versions state?

1 After these things the Lord appointed other seventy also, and sent them two and two before his face into every city and place, whither he himself would come.

No major doctrine? How about the major doctrine in God's word is truth. How about the major doctrine that a faithful witness cannot lie?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back