The bible says the Holy Spirit delivered the message.I see no difference.
I will tell you why I see no difference.
Because I read the bible and I know the words originate from the Lord and as I read them, they are delivered to me from the originator. So, the originator of the message is the one that is delivering that same message to me as I read the words in the bible.
I see no difference.
I will tell you why I see no difference.
Because I read the bible and I know the words originate from the Lord and as I read them, they are delivered to me from the originator. So, the originator of the message is the one that is delivering that same message to me as I read the words in the bible.
Is this your prophetic word? I’d hate to see you end up in the same heap with the other false prophets.The Future Antichrist Is Going To Be A Jew/Hebrew in Ancestry, As Scripture Clearly Teaches
What makes the most sense?I agree it makes the most sense.
my particular church, no way. every sermon our pastor tells us Christ is God about 15 times, at least. we call it "rule #1" for interpreting scripture: Christ is never not God. we are trained to spot denying that within 5 minutes
![]()
This makes absolutely no sense, and this thoughtless response started the Michael archangel derailment.You must be a Jehovah's Witness Then?
The bible says the Holy Spirit delivered the message.
It says the father originated the message
And it says the son completed the message.
You're more concerned with world opinion and views than you are with faith. I'm not the only one who understands this. There isn't anything mysterious about Jesus being called by other names in the Scriptures, yet there is tremendous resistance from people who apparently need validation by other people on what to believe.Well then God the father is also Michael then according to that reasoning. It’s just not a sound or historical belief. Like I said before, the only other person that first came to believe what you do had to claim to be a prophet because he knew his understanding wasn’t shared by anyone else in history.
I am not sure how this answers my question. Is this a deflect?You're more concerned with world opinion and views than you are with faith. I'm not the only one who understands this. There isn't anything mysterious about Jesus being called by other names in the Scriptures, yet there is tremendous resistance from people who apparently need validation by other people on what to believe.
Jesus hasn't delivered his message to the world in the form of scripture or spoken through a prophet? I wonder how you even believe in Jesus if at all.If you think it is Jesus you would be wrong
He is ABOVE the angels.. He is also the creator. No angel created anything
That reply was to someone else and you haven't asked a question. Because I see little to no faith in you, you will be ignored.I am not sure how this answers my question. Is this a deflect?
That’s not true, I’m just not arrogant enough to think that a belief that I hold about Christianity can be true if no other person in 1,870 years ever came to that conclusion. And the one person that did, had to declare himself a prophet in order to get people to believe it.You're more concerned with world opinion and views than you are with faith. I'm not the only one who understands this. There isn't anything mysterious about Jesus being called by other names in the Scriptures, yet there is tremendous resistance from people who apparently need validation by other people on what to believe.
Jesus hasn't delivered his message to the world in the form of scripture or spoken through a prophet? I wonder how you even believe in Jesus if at all.
Give glory to all the angels then. They did all the work. Since Jesus didn't spread his message to the world, who did it? Must have been these mysterious angels we know so little about.
Archangel = archangel, or chief of the angels.
angel =
Now tell me, who is chief of the angels?
- messenger, representative
- messenger
- angel
- the theophanic angel
Actually if you look at your response you quoted me. So you are being dishonest.That reply was to someone else and you haven't asked a question. Because I see little to no faith in you, you will be ignored.
Distraction in "false accusation" in personal attacks, grow upIs this your prophetic word? I’d hate to see you end up in the same heap with the other false prophets.
Michael The Arch Angel Being Jesus Christ?Completely irrelevant to your claim that Jesus is Michael the archangel.
Will you strip Jesus of His Godhood and reduce Him to angel status?
That’s not true, I’m just not arrogant enough to think that a belief that I hold about Christianity can be true if no other person in 1,870 years ever came to that conclusion. And the one person that did, had to declare himself a prophet in order to get people to believe it.
I'm weary of answering foolish questions and never having my very simple, straight forward question answered.Completely irrelevant to your claim that Jesus is Michael the archangel.
Will you strip Jesus of His Godhood and reduce Him to angel status?
Thank you. I love you.She's not JW
JWs think Michael traded places with Christ on the cross.
She thinks Michael is a Christophany, like Melchizadek and 'The Angel of the LORD' in the OT
I'm not sold on what she believes about Michael, but I do think she has a much better argument for it than the JWs have for their crazy ideas.
I'm not going to make an enemy out of my sister because of this topic, even if I think she's wrong.![]()
The Future Antichrist Is Going To Be A Jew/Hebrew in Ancestry, As Scripture Clearly Teaches
Is this your prophetic word? I’d hate to see you end up in the same heap with the other false prophets.
Distraction in "false accusation" in personal attacks, grow up![]()