4Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.Habakkuk 2:4 KJV
Now look at how you mis quoted it .
4Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.Habakkuk 2:4 KJV
Then why you questioning the voracity of James regarding the New Testament non-distinction between Jew and Gentile established by the Cross?No literally ever verse in all 66 books is the words of God ..Every word.
I'm not the one ignoring verses . Like James 1 . v 1Then why you questioning the voracity of James regarding the New Testament non-distinction between Jew and Gentile established by the Cross?
Psalms 40:8 KJV, Leviticus 19:17-19 KJV, the poignant love story in Hosea representative of God's desire that we love and be faithful to Him as Hosea desired of Gomer...Could you quote that verse, the one you said how the Just lived in the OT please?
You absolutely ignore the ones which disprove your premise and "wrest" those which you believe establish it.I'm not the one ignoring verses . Like James 1 . v 1
I'm not the one mis quoting hab 2.4Then why you questioning the voracity of James regarding the New Testament non-distinction between Jew and Gentile established by the Cross?
like Hab 2.4 ?You absolutely ignore the ones which disprove your premise and "wrest" those which you believe establish it.
There's a diff between "partially quoting, which I did, and " and "mis quoting".I'm not the one mis quoting hab 2.4
Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.You absolutely ignore the ones which disprove your premise and "wrest" those which you believe establish it.
No the part you quoted was wrong. You missed a crucial word out .There's a diff between "partially quoting, which I did, and " and "mis quoting".
Yes, that's the irrefutable evidence of DispensationalismBehold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.
No the part you quoted was wrong. You missed a crucial word out .
This is what you said .Yes, that's the irrefutable evidence of Dispensationalism
Are you trying to make the lifted up dude and the dude with faith the SAME dude? Not ridiculous, but reDONKulous.
Not sure why that is significant to this discussion.
The NC was ratified (went into administrative effect) by the blood of Jesus, just as the OC was ratified with the blood of animals. There was no intermediate period between the two.
Amen!!! Got me good! Jesus is Lord indeed!What a good good thing that God is good, tender, loving, and merciful, as well as just.
Beautiful animal![]()
Yes its still Jesus, about Jesus , For Jesus from start to finish.LOL Jesus is "the same yesteday, today, and forever", even before the Cross. Remember His existence before the Cross?
How come Lordship Salvation, leaves a Bitter Taste in some peoples mouths.
It has such a sweet taste in my mouth. The sweetness of JESUS running my LIFE.
I wouldn't have it any other way.
What is lordship salvation all about?look at phoneman's posts.
that version of lordship salvation is very off-putting.
someone who knows the Bible sees that attitude, and runs away from it.
What is lordship salvation all about?
If only that was what ' Lordship salvation ' is . We get a good reminder of the reality of it everytime we look at our watches. Calvin made Jewellery a bad thing in the church , a sin . Not befitting of a person claiming Jesus to be Lord . Naturally man tends to have a work a round for 'rules 'and came up with a time piece instead.. Watches became more and more fancy. like jewellery. The flesh is just provoked more with 'Lordship 'salvation .How come Lordship Salvation, leaves a Bitter Taste in some peoples mouths.
It has such a sweet taste in my mouth. The sweetness of JESUS running my LIFE.
I wouldn't have it any other way.