You first said vaccines originated in the sixties. That was obviously wrong.
Excuse me for thinking the real facts informed you as to the truth of the situation.
Since that ^ is blatantly false... Vaccines go back hundreds of years.
I thought it was the 1960s, could have been a different decade.
Does it make a moral difference to you when vaccines developed from murdered babies entered the scene and became the gold standard for all vaccines that came after?
Just sounds like a bunch of whataboutism and hair splitting.
There are more important points at stake here.
Edit: check my sourced post on the previous page:
"Fibroblast cells are the cells needed to hold skin and other connective tissue together. The fetal fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first
obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s. These same fetal cells obtained from the early 1960s have continued to grow in the laboratory and are used to make vaccines today. No further sources of fetal cells are needed to make these vaccines."