ALERT: THE VACCINE MIGHT BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST

[shittim]

Looks like the whole company will ne shipped off to the camps?

 

[PennEd]

The unreported carnage continues:

Desirée Penrod: 25-year-old Connecticut educator dead one week after Johnson & Johnson viral vector shot
March 22, 20213 min readadmin
TheCOVIDBlog.com
March 22, 2021

Ms. Desirée Penrod
DANIELSON, CONNECTICUT — The Johnson & Johnson experimental viral vector shot has claimed another young victim with a promising future.
Ms. Desirée Penrod said on Facebook that she received the “Janssen dose” on or around March 9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals is the drug division of Johnson & Johnson, and developed the JNJ-78436735 viral vector shot. It is marketed as the one-dose vaccine. The 25-year-old educator said she felt no adverse effects the first day of the shot. But she said the “vaccine is killing me today” on March 10.

She engaged with several people who commented on her post that day. Ms. Penrod said the shots were offered to her through the Killingly School District in Danielson, Connecticut. She worked at Killingly Memorial School, which serves grades 2 to 4. Ms. Penrod thanked several people for their concern and told others considering the shot, “no need to be nervous.”

Another person commented, “[the symptoms] lasted two days for me, then voila it was gone.” Ms. Penrod responded that she had her fingers crossed that March 10 would be the last day of her symptoms and it “goes away.”
The next day she said she was feeling better “for the most part.” That was the last comment she made on Facebook. Ms. Penrod died on Wednesday, March 17, becoming the youngest victim this blog has covered for all of the experimental shots.



Her wake is this Wednesday, March 24 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at Gagnon and Costello Funeral Home in Danielson.

 

[SophieT]

• Some of the same drug companies now responsible for developing and manufacturing fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccines were also responsible for creating the opioid crisis in the U.S., which has killed as many Americans as have died from COVID-19
• Most have also been convicted of other unethical and criminal activities over the years, any of which puts their ethical fitness into question
• In 2019, an Oklahoma court found Johnson & Johnson partially liable for the “human and financial costs” of the opioid epidemic in the U.S. and ordered the company to pay $572 million
• Two other COVID-19 vaccine makers, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, are habitual offenders, having repeatedly engaged in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribery and science suppression. Pfizer’s vaccine plant, where COVID-19 vaccine vials are to be filled, also has a long history of quality control problems
• Research confirms the suspicion that the lipid nanoparticles used in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines are highly inflammatory, and may be responsible for many of the adverse effects reported

 

[SophieT]

Lipid Nanoparticles Are Highly Inflammatory
mRNA fragility and instability is the reason why Pfizer and Moderna use a lipid nanoparticle delivery system, which brings a whole separate set of problems. Scientist and researcher Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., believes the nanoparticle allows the mRNA to escape the normal degradation by enzymes that normally remove mRNA, thereby allowing it to persist in your tissues for a long time, continuing to produce spike proteins all the while.

As previously suspected, research30 posted March 4, 2021, on the preprint server bioRxiv now warns that the lipid nanoparticle component of these mRNA vaccines is in fact “highly inflammatory” and may be responsible for many of the side effects being reported. According to the authors:

“Vaccines based on mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising new platform used by two leading vaccines … Clinical trials and ongoing vaccinations present with very high protection levels and varying degrees of side effects. However, the nature of the reported side effects remains poorly defined.​

Here we present evidence that LNPs used in many preclinical studies are highly inflammatory in mice.​

Intradermal injection of these LNPs led to rapid and robust inflammatory responses, characterized by massive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The same dose of LNP delivered intranasally led to similar inflammatory responses in the lung and resulted in a high mortality rate …​

Their potent adjuvant activity and reported superiority comparing to other adjuvants in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses could stem from their inflammatory nature. Furthermore, the preclinical LNPs are similar to the ones used for human vaccines, which could also explain the observed side effects in humans using this platform.”​

 

[SophieT]

There actually is no arguement 'for' taking the vaccine and many many reasons NOT to take it.

 

[PennEd]

The horrendous beat goes on......

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1373424480324886531

 

[Scribe]

Lipid Nanoparticles Are Highly Inflammatory
mRNA fragility and instability is the reason why Pfizer and Moderna use a lipid nanoparticle delivery system, which brings a whole separate set of problems. Scientist and researcher Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., believes the nanoparticle allows the mRNA to escape the normal degradation by enzymes that normally remove mRNA, thereby allowing it to persist in your tissues for a long time, continuing to produce spike proteins all the while.

As previously suspected, research30 posted March 4, 2021, on the preprint server bioRxiv now warns that the lipid nanoparticle component of these mRNA vaccines is in fact “highly inflammatory” and may be responsible for many of the side effects being reported. According to the authors:

“Vaccines based on mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising new platform used by two leading vaccines … Clinical trials and ongoing vaccinations present with very high protection levels and varying degrees of side effects. However, the nature of the reported side effects remains poorly defined.​

Here we present evidence that LNPs used in many preclinical studies are highly inflammatory in mice.​

Intradermal injection of these LNPs led to rapid and robust inflammatory responses, characterized by massive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The same dose of LNP delivered intranasally led to similar inflammatory responses in the lung and resulted in a high mortality rate …​

Their potent adjuvant activity and reported superiority comparing to other adjuvants in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses could stem from their inflammatory nature. Furthermore, the preclinical LNPs are similar to the ones used for human vaccines, which could also explain the observed side effects in humans using this platform.”​

Just do a google search on Judy Mikovits, Ph.D and check out all the fact checking links that say this is total falsehood misinformation and that this woman is a total fraud.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...sial-virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/08/plandemic-judy-mikovits-coronavirus/

Judy Anne Mikovits (born 1957 or 1958) is an American former research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, such as that murine endogenous retroviruses are linked to chronic fatigue syndrome. As an outgrowth of these claims, she has engaged in anti-vaccination activism, promoted conspiracy theories, and been accused of scientific misconduct. She has made false claims about vaccines, COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), among others.

 

[PennEd]

Benjamin Goodman: 32-year-old New York stagehand dead 24 hours after Johnson & Johnson viral vector shot
March 21, 20212 min read
NEW YORK — The Food and Drug Administration authorized the Janssen Pharmaceuticals/Johnson & Johnson viral vector shot for emergency use on February 27. It has now claimed the life of a promising young professional.
Mr. Benjamin Goodman went to a Walgreens pop-up COVID-19 “vaccine” clinic in Chelsea, New York on Saturday, March 13. He received the experimental Johnson & Johnson viral vector shot, according to his stepmother Pamela Goodman. Benjamin texted his father, Jeff Goodman, and told him he received the shot. The family was not happy to hear the news. Soon thereafter, Benjamin had a severe headache and started feeling ill. He fell asleep, hoping the symptoms would pass after some rest.
Mr. Goodman woke up at 1 a.m. with a high fever and chills. His fiancée, Lindsay Janisse, was awakened to Mr. Goodman having seizures at 4 a.m.. Ms. Janisse called 911 as Mr. Goodman went into cardiac arrest. Paramedics tried, unsuccessfully, to revive him on the scene. Mr. Goodman was rushed to a nearby Mount Sinai Hospital. But he was pronounced dead at 6:05 a.m. Sunday morning, March 14.
His mother did not mince words as to what happened to her son.

Mr. Goodman was a member of Local One International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees. He worked behind-the-scenes on several NBC and CBS shows. Mr. Goodman was recently accepted into the Michigan State University MBA program, and planned to enroll this fall. He and Lindsay planned to marry on June 25, 2022. A GoFundMe page is collecting donations for funeral and other costs.

 

[SophieT]

Just do a google search on Judy Mikovits, Ph.D and check out all the fact checking links that say this is total falsehood misinformation and that this woman is a total fraud.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...sial-virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/08/plandemic-judy-mikovits-coronavirus/

Judy Anne Mikovits (born 1957 or 1958) is an American former research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, such as that murine endogenous retroviruses are linked to chronic fatigue syndrome. As an outgrowth of these claims, she has engaged in anti-vaccination activism, promoted conspiracy theories, and been accused of scientific misconduct. She has made false claims about vaccines, COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), among others.

I realize you need constant affirmation for your stance on the non-vaccine, but just do a google search on the lawsuits against the companies who have magically produced the potion of your dreams

I've already had a really bad reaction to a vaccine produced by Gates research biz so tell me all about it. Doctors hummed and hawed over it without offering any resolution because there is really none. Very very thankful to God that I am over it cause it went on for 3 years and blood test after blood test showed no other disease. In other words, anything the doctors could think of, was not my problem.

Of course you will prob say it was not the vacc. However even the doctors (only saw 4) did not deny the possibility, without confirming of course.

And what is worse, is that there is constant denial about the side effects of any vaccine. Death is still the worst one of course.

I can't take the new non-vacc because I would most likely go into anaphylactic shock, (but even so, I will not be poked ) And that is a medical diagnosis, not my own.

 

[SophieT]

Johnson & Johnson Found Partly Liable for Opioid Crisis
In 2019, Johnson & Johnson was found partially liable for the “human and financial costs” of the opioid epidemic in the U.S. and was ordered to pay $572 million to the state of Oklahoma. While the company denied any wrongdoing, “data revealed during the trial proved a culture of downplaying the risks of opioids to customers and physicians,” Cassiobury Court reported, adding:1

“Sales representatives were trained to tell doctors that the risk of addiction was 2.6% or less if the drugs were prescribed by a doctor and, most shockingly, doctors were specifically targeted as ‘key customers’ if they had a history of prescribing a high amount of opioids.”​

In “Capitalism Gone Wrong: How Big Pharma Created America’s Opioid Carnage,” published in The Guardian July 24, 2019, Chris McGreal, author of “American Overdose, the Opioid Tragedy in Three Acts,” wrote:2

“Oklahoma’s attorney general accused the company of a ‘cunning, cynical and deceitful scheme’ to ramp up narcotic painkiller sales as one of a web of firms that created the biggest drug epidemic in American history as profits surged. The companies worked in step to change medical culture and practice by influencing doctors, researchers, federal regulators and politicians.”​

Curiously, as noted by Brand, Johnson & Johnson’s stock price rose by 5% immediately following that verdict. What this means, he suggests, is that we’ve created systems that encourage malpractice. Profit motives override all other concerns, including lethal effects.

Importantly, Johnson & Johnson made false claims about the safety of its opioid, going so far as to manipulate scientific papers to support its assertion that the risk of addiction was less than 2.6%.3 As Brand points out, when companies engage in unethical behavior, especially the falsification and manipulation of science, they create distrust and cynicism.

This should be obvious, and it’s nobody’s fault but their own. We can point to these very specific examples and say, “Look here. They manipulated and falsified science to make money. When they were caught, all they had to do was pay a manageable fine, which they recouped through a rise in stock price.”

If it happened once (and believe me, it’s happened more than once), it can happen again. And if it can happen at all, why couldn’t this unethical behavior occur when creating what is expected to be a phenomenally profitable pandemic vaccine? We’re told we must not question the safety or effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, yet the histories of the makers are such that not questioning everything they do would be naïve in the extreme.

Johnson & Johnson has also been involved in a long list of product safety and contamination issues, marketing and safety violations, government contract violations and foreign corrupt practices resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in fines. You can find their rap sheet on the Corporate Research Project’s website.4

 

[SophieT]

Pfizer’s Long History of Unethical Behavior
Another COVID-19 vaccine maker, Pfizer, has been sued in multiple venues over unethical behavior,5 including unethical drug testing and illegal marketing practices.

In 2014, it was ordered to pay $75 million to settle charges relating to its testing of a new broad spectrum antibiotic on critically ill Nigerian children. As reported by the Independent6 at the time, Pfizer sent a team of doctors into Nigeria in the midst of a meningitis epidemic.

For two weeks, the team set up “within meters” of a medical station run by Doctors Without Borders and began dispensing the experimental drug, Trovan. Of the 200 children picked, half got the experimental drug and the other half the already licensed antibiotic Rocephin. Eleven of the children treated by the Pfizer team died, and many others suffered side effects such as brain damage and organ failure.

Pfizer denied wrongdoing. According to the company, only five of the children given Trovan died, compared to six who received Rocephin, so their drug was not to blame. The problem was they apparently never told the parents that their children were being given an experimental drug.

What’s more, while Pfizer produced a permission letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, the letter turned out to have been backdated. The ethics committee itself wasn’t set up until a year after the trial had already taken place.

In his 2010 paper,7 “Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR,” Robert G. Evans, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor at Vancouver School of Economics, described Pfizer as “a ‘habitual offender,’ persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.” Between 2002 and 2010 alone, Pfizer and its subsidiaries were fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards.

Such sums did nothing to deter bad behavior. In 2011, Pfizer agreed to pay $14.5 million to settle federal charges of illegal marketing,8 and in 2014 they settled federal charges relating to improper marketing of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million.9

The Corporate Research Project also details Pfizer’s history of bribery, environmental violations, labor and worker safety violations and more.10 Pfizer has also been bullying countries to put up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its vaccine.

Pfizer’s Vaccine Plant Has History of Recalls
A March 10, 2021, article11 by KHN also highlights persistent, long-standing problems at Pfizer’s vaccine plant in Kansas, which is slated to start producing COVID-19 vaccines:

“The McPherson, Kansas, facility, which FDA inspectors wrote is the nation’s largest manufacturer of sterile injectable controlled substances, has a long, troubled history. Nearly a decade’s worth of FDA inspection reports, recalls and reprimands reviewed by KHN show the facility as a repeat offender.​

FDA investigators have repeatedly noted in reports that the plant has failed to control quality and contamination or fully investigate after production failures.​

The 1970s-era manufacturing site has had persistent mold concerns over the years and been the focus of at least four intense FDA inspections since Pfizer took over its operations in late 2015, when it acquired Hospira.”​

The plant is going to be a fill-and-finish site for the Pfizer vaccine. The question is whether the site has really cleaned up its act, or whether contamination might become an issue.

"The facility’s record of recalls and field alerts include vials of medication that contained glass and cardboard particles and, as one customer complained, a ‘small insect or speck of dust,'" KHN reports.​

“A 2017 FDA warning letter … said the contaminants such as cardboard and glass found in vials posed a ‘severe risk of harm to patients’ and indicated that the facility’s process for manufacturing sterile injectable products was ‘out of control.’”​

 

[SophieT]

AstraZeneca’s Extensive Rap Sheet
Then there’s AstraZeneca, whose director of research for the drug Seroquel, Wayne MacFadden, confessed to entering into multiple sexual affairs for the sole purpose of obtaining information and favors that might benefit the company.12

Aside from that eyebrow-raising scandal, AstraZeneca has been brought into the halls of justice more than once. Below is but a sampling of its criminal history. Even more can be found on the Corporate Research Project’s “AstraZeneca: Corporate Rap Sheet” page:13

• In 2003, AstraZeneca was fined $355 million to settle Medicare fraud charges relating to its marketing of the cancer drug Zoladex.14,15 Among the many charges they pleaded guilty to was that they had encouraged doctors to illegally request Medicare reimbursements. Four years later, in 2007, the company was ordered to pay another $12.9 million in damages for its overcharging Medicare and private insurance for Zoladex16
• In 2005, the European Commission fined AstraZeneca 60 million euros for misusing the patent system to delay market entry of competing generics17,18
• In 2010, AstraZeneca was fined $520 million for off-label drug marketing19
• Also in 2010, the company agreed to pay $198 million to settle more than 25,000 lawsuits filed by patients harmed by three of its psychiatric drugs20
• In 2016, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission fined the company $4.3 million for improperly influencing and rewarding prescribers to use their products, in other words, bribery21

AstraZeneca’s Vaccine Is For-Profit After All
Now, AstraZeneca has made a big deal about its vow not to profit from its COVID-19 vaccine. Adrian Hill, director of Oxford’s Jenner Institute and the co-developer of the AstraZeneca vaccine, has gone on record saying “I personally don’t believe that in a time of pandemic there should be exclusive licenses.”22 As reported by KHN:23

“Oxford University surprised and pleased advocates of overhauling the vaccine business in April by promising to donate the rights to its promising coronavirus vaccine to any drugmaker. The idea was to provide medicines preventing or treating COVID-19 at a low cost or free of charge, the British university said …​

‘We actually thought they were going to do that,’ James Love, director of Knowledge Ecology International, a nonprofit that works to expand access to medical technology, said of Oxford’s pledge. ‘Why wouldn’t people agree to let everyone have access to the best vaccines possible?’”​

The fantasy didn’t last long. A few weeks later, Oxford University caved to the urgings of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and signed an exclusive contract with AstraZeneca. According to an article in The Nation,24 “Gates himself describes his foundation as intimately involved in the partnership between AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford.”

This vaccine deal gives AstraZeneca “sole rights and no guarantee of low prices,” KHN writes.25 Indeed, the not-for-profit vow expires once the pandemic is over, and AstraZeneca itself appears to have a say when it comes to declaring the end date. It could be as early as July 1, 2021, according to a company memo obtained by the Financial Times.26

As explained by investigative journalist Whitney Webb in a recent Corbett Report interview,27 the actual patents and royalties for the AstraZeneca vaccine are held by a private company called Vaccitech, which has been quite open about the future profit potential with its shareholders, noting that the COVID-19 vaccine will most likely become an annual vaccine that is updated each season. Oxford University itself also stands to make millions from the deal. According to KHN:28

“Other companies working on coronavirus vaccines have followed the same line, collecting billions in government grants, hoarding patents, revealing as little as possible about their deals — and planning to charge up to $37 a dose for potentially hundreds of millions of shots.”​

All of this tells you that the same greed that drove these drug companies into criminal acts before is still at play today, and they have repeatedly proven that profit potential wins over harm potential every time.

 

[Aidan1]

AstraZeneca’s Extensive Rap Sheet
Then there’s AstraZeneca, whose director of research for the drug Seroquel, Wayne MacFadden, confessed to entering into multiple sexual affairs for the sole purpose of obtaining information and favors that might benefit the company.12

Aside from that eyebrow-raising scandal, AstraZeneca has been brought into the halls of justice more than once. Below is but a sampling of its criminal history. Even more can be found on the Corporate Research Project’s “AstraZeneca: Corporate Rap Sheet” page:13

• In 2003, AstraZeneca was fined $355 million to settle Medicare fraud charges relating to its marketing of the cancer drug Zoladex.14,15 Among the many charges they pleaded guilty to was that they had encouraged doctors to illegally request Medicare reimbursements. Four years later, in 2007, the company was ordered to pay another $12.9 million in damages for its overcharging Medicare and private insurance for Zoladex16
• In 2005, the European Commission fined AstraZeneca 60 million euros for misusing the patent system to delay market entry of competing generics17,18
• In 2010, AstraZeneca was fined $520 million for off-label drug marketing19
• Also in 2010, the company agreed to pay $198 million to settle more than 25,000 lawsuits filed by patients harmed by three of its psychiatric drugs20
• In 2016, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission fined the company $4.3 million for improperly influencing and rewarding prescribers to use their products, in other words, bribery21

AstraZeneca’s Vaccine Is For-Profit After All
Now, AstraZeneca has made a big deal about its vow not to profit from its COVID-19 vaccine. Adrian Hill, director of Oxford’s Jenner Institute and the co-developer of the AstraZeneca vaccine, has gone on record saying “I personally don’t believe that in a time of pandemic there should be exclusive licenses.”22 As reported by KHN:23

“Oxford University surprised and pleased advocates of overhauling the vaccine business in April by promising to donate the rights to its promising coronavirus vaccine to any drugmaker. The idea was to provide medicines preventing or treating COVID-19 at a low cost or free of charge, the British university said …​

‘We actually thought they were going to do that,’ James Love, director of Knowledge Ecology International, a nonprofit that works to expand access to medical technology, said of Oxford’s pledge. ‘Why wouldn’t people agree to let everyone have access to the best vaccines possible?’”​

The fantasy didn’t last long. A few weeks later, Oxford University caved to the urgings of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and signed an exclusive contract with AstraZeneca. According to an article in The Nation,24 “Gates himself describes his foundation as intimately involved in the partnership between AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford.”

This vaccine deal gives AstraZeneca “sole rights and no guarantee of low prices,” KHN writes.25 Indeed, the not-for-profit vow expires once the pandemic is over, and AstraZeneca itself appears to have a say when it comes to declaring the end date. It could be as early as July 1, 2021, according to a company memo obtained by the Financial Times.26

As explained by investigative journalist Whitney Webb in a recent Corbett Report interview,27 the actual patents and royalties for the AstraZeneca vaccine are held by a private company called Vaccitech, which has been quite open about the future profit potential with its shareholders, noting that the COVID-19 vaccine will most likely become an annual vaccine that is updated each season. Oxford University itself also stands to make millions from the deal. According to KHN:28

“Other companies working on coronavirus vaccines have followed the same line, collecting billions in government grants, hoarding patents, revealing as little as possible about their deals — and planning to charge up to $37 a dose for potentially hundreds of millions of shots.”​

All of this tells you that the same greed that drove these drug companies into criminal acts before is still at play today, and they have repeatedly proven that profit potential wins over harm potential every time.

Who is not working because for provit? And can you expect from an ungodly world to act godly? But this makes the vaccine not to a Mark of the beast.

 

[Aidan1]

I realize you need constant affirmation for your stance on the non-vaccine, but just do a google search on the lawsuits against the companies who have magically produced the potion of your dreams

I've already had a really bad reaction to a vaccine produced by Gates research biz so tell me all about it. Doctors hummed and hawed over it without offering any resolution because there is really none. Very very thankful to God that I am over it cause it went on for 3 years and blood test after blood test showed no other disease. In other words, anything the doctors could think of, was not my problem.

Of course you will prob say it was not the vacc. However even the doctors (only saw 4) did not deny the possibility, without confirming of course.

And what is worse, is that there is constant denial about the side effects of any vaccine. Death is still the worst one of course.

I can't take the new non-vacc because I would most likely go into anaphylactic shock, (but even so, I will not be poked ) And that is a medical diagnosis, not my own.

The thing is, that almost All drugs have sideeffects and there are a minority of people whos body react in a bad way. This is with All Kind of vaccine the same. Its finally a use/ risk question.
In case of Covid the majority will not get an health Problem. But many will get( also younger people). And this is to avoid.
Otherwise we should look, like 100 years ago. Who survive without Problem is lucky, the others then its the way of life.

 

[PennEd]

Dr Mengele is alive and well in Germany:

Germany: Whistleblower says seven of 31 nursing home residents died immediately after forced Pfizer mRNA shots
March 21, 20213 min readadmin

BERLIN –A frightening video of a lawyer interviewing an anonymous whistleblower tells stories of horror at a Berlin nursing home for dementia patients.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is one of the most important voices for truth about COVID-19 and so-called vaccines in the world. He is an attorney admitted to the Bar of Germany and the State Bar of California. His organization helps business owners in Germany recover damages resulting from COVID-19 lockdowns and other measures. Dr. Fuellmich is also one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee. The committee, after nine months of investigation, has already concluded that COVID-19 and experimental shots are “probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.”
Dr. Fuellmich and associate attorney Viviane Fischer conducted an interview with a Berlin nursing home caregiver on February 8. The whistleblower’s voice is distorted and his face hidden to protect his identity. The 40-minute video is conducted in German, with English subtitles. The whistleblower talks about how seven residents died almost immediately after the first Pfizer mRNA shot in January. Several more got sick. Despite the deaths and adverse effects, the surviving residents were given the second shot a few weeks later. One more resident died and 11 more became severely ill.
Disturbing details and footage
Everyone must watch the full video. But the 3:46 mark is where the disturbing images commence. The whistleblower said outside teams of four people, including German soldiers, administered the shots. He described the horror and fear on the residents’ faces because of the military presence. You can also clearly see their anxiety in the footage. Further, all of them have dementia. They cannot consent to getting experiment mRNA shots.

Many residents were old enough to remember World War II. The 6:59 mark shows how residents were fearful of doctors they did not recognize. One resident was an opera singer and in good physical health before the shots. He had convulsions within 30 minutes after the first shot. Medics rushed him to a nearby hospital. But doctors refused to take into consideration that he just received the Pfizer shot. Instead they determined his symptoms were caused by COVID-19. The resident is now dying despite jogging and being physically active before the shots. Another 11 residents are now in grave condition after the second shot, according to the whistleblower.
The lawyers filed a complaint with local law enforcement and prosecutors. There is no further update on the matter.

 

[gb9]

The thing is, that almost All drugs have sideeffects and there are a minority of people whos body react in a bad way. This is with All Kind of vaccine the same. Its finally a use/ risk question.
In case of Covid the majority will not get an health Problem. But many will get( also younger people). And this is to avoid.
Otherwise we should look, like 100 years ago. Who survive without Problem is lucky, the others then its the way of life.

most will not get covid. and, according to their overblown numbers, covid has a 98% survival rate.

and, in a country of 330 million people, their are 7 million cases. so, a 97.6 % chance that you will NOT encounter someone with covid.

so, not vax for me. not for something with a 98% survial rate.

 

[SophieT]

Who is not working because for provit? And can you expect from an ungodly world to act godly? But this makes the vaccine not to a Mark of the beast.

You had to work pretty hard to overlook the fact that these companies LIE, CHANGE RESULTS AND DENY for their profit

Since I said nothing about marks or beasts, I guess you like to add to what people say to justify your conclusions

smh

 

[SophieT]

The thing is, that almost All drugs have sideeffects and there are a minority of people whos body react in a bad way. This is with All Kind of vaccine the same. Its finally a use/ risk question.
In case of Covid the majority will not get an health Problem. But many will get( also younger people). And this is to avoid.
Otherwise we should look, like 100 years ago. Who survive without Problem is lucky, the others then its the way of life.

Talk yourself into whatever helps you sleep at night. Ignore the facts. I posted FACTS and you simply dismiss the facts because you choose to take the un-vaccine

That is YOUR choice, but dismissing truth is a problem. You have nothing of substance, nor any facts to counter what I posted

 

[Aidan1]

Talk yourself into whatever helps you sleep at night. Ignore the facts. I posted FACTS and you simply dismiss the facts because you choose to take the un-vaccine

That is YOUR choice, but dismissing truth is a problem. You have nothing of substance, nor any facts to counter what I posted

Beg a pardon. I postet facts. The fact, that every drug has a sideeffect which is not wantet. Shure it is also a question of the dosis.
I defend not the concerns which making their dollars with. I only said, that from ungodly people I cant expect godly behavings.
I got already 2 Shots Pfizer because i work in hospital.

 

[Billyd]

Beg a pardon. I postet facts. The fact, that every drug has a sideeffect which is not wantet. Shure it is also a question of the dosis.
I defend not the concerns which making their dollars with. I only said, that from ungodly people I cant expect godly behavings.
I got already 2 Shots Pfizer because i work in hospital.

Are you sure you haven't grown horns and a tail?lol

I got 2 moderna shots. No significant side effects. No one that has received a vaccine in my county has reported side effects and there have been no covid19 positives among them. As the eligibility age goes down, we are seeing a sharp decline in the age groups.