I haven't read any of the posts here but the first one, simply because I don't have the time to read 116 pages worth of comments.
As terribly opposed as I am to the vaccine (I'll
NEVER take it), it is most definitely NOT "the mark of the beast".
For starters, "the mark of the beast" is just that..."the mark of THE BEAST". In other words, in Bible prophecy, a "beast" is representative of a "king" (Dan. 7:17) and his "kingdom" (Dan. 7:23), and we're given many descriptors which help us to identify exactly who "THE BEAST" is that "the mark" must be associated with. In regard to this vaccine, as evil as it is, it is NOT related to "THE BEAST" that we've long been forewarned of. That's problem number one.
Problem number two is that there is also "another beast" or another king/kingdom which will enforce "the mark of THE BEAST" or the "mark of THE FIRST BEAST" which came before it, chronologically speaking.
We read:
Revelation chapter 13
[
11]
And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
[
12]
And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship
the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
[
13] And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
[
14] And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
[
15] And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
[
16]
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
[
17]
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
[
18] Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
Again, there are two separate "beasts" or kingdoms.
"The mark of THE BEAST" is directly associated with "the first beast" (vs. 12), but it is actually enforced by "another beast".
If we look at all of the different descriptors that we're given in relation to these two separate "beasts", then we can easily identify who they actually are.
I recently made a rather long post in relation to the identity of the "another beast" (vs. 11) who will ultimately force "the mark of the beast" upon mankind.
If anyone is interested in reading it, then you can do so here:
https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/is-god-giving-america-up.197885/page-2#post-4508933