Jesus and Paul -two different gospels?
- Thread starter phil36
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
This ' good news ' is not the same as the good news we preach today.
luke 10
25¶And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26¶He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27¶And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28¶And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
luke 10
25¶And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26¶He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27¶And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28¶And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
L
Hi, throughfaith.
Seeing how I've read the Bible a multitude of times over the last 32 years, including literally reading some of Paul's epistles 100 times or more, I can assure you that it wasn't a hasty response.
When it comes to Paul's gospel, it was not only the same as Jesus', but also the same gospel that God preached to Abraham (Gal. 3:10), and the same gospel that Moses preached to the children of Israel (Deut. 30:11-14, Rom. 10:6-10).
Seeing how I've read the Bible a multitude of times over the last 32 years, including literally reading some of Paul's epistles 100 times or more, I can assure you that it wasn't a hasty response.
When it comes to Paul's gospel, it was not only the same as Jesus', but also the same gospel that God preached to Abraham (Gal. 3:10), and the same gospel that Moses preached to the children of Israel (Deut. 30:11-14, Rom. 10:6-10).
-
2
-
1
- Show all
This is what they believe quite shocking really and unbiblical.
We understand that Christ designated Paul to be our Apostle today. It is in “Paul’s writings alone that we find the doctrine, position, walk, and destiny of the church” which is his body.
For those with ears to hear, we confidently teach mid-Acts Pauline dispensational right division of a King James Bible.
We understand that Christ designated Paul to be our Apostle today. It is in “Paul’s writings alone that we find the doctrine, position, walk, and destiny of the church” which is his body.
For those with ears to hear, we confidently teach mid-Acts Pauline dispensational right division of a King James Bible.
Do you find what Paul said in Romans 16:25 to be quite shocking too?
Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,
How arrogant of Paul to call the gospel "my gospel", he totally disregarded Peter and the others.
Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,
How arrogant of Paul to call the gospel "my gospel", he totally disregarded Peter and the others.
-
1
- Show all
No I just find what the Hyper dispensationalists and the like say is shocking and unbiblical, as follows below:-
We understand that Christ designated Paul to be our Apostle today. It is in “Paul’s writings alone that we find the doctrine, position, walk, and destiny of the church” which is his body.
For those with ears to hear, we confidently teach mid-Acts Pauline dispensational right division of a King James Bible.
-
1
- Show all
L
Ummm....no.
Far from disregarding Peter and the others, this is what Paul actually did:
Galatians chapter 2
[1] Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.
[2] And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
[3] But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:
[4] And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:
[5] To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
[6] But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
[7] But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
[8] (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles)
[9] And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
Paul actually communicated the gospel that he was preaching to James, Peter/Cephas, and John lest by any means he had been running in vain, so you might want to retract your erroneous statement.
Far from disregarding Peter and the others, this is what Paul actually did:
Galatians chapter 2
[1] Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.
[2] And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
[3] But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:
[4] And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:
[5] To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
[6] But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
[7] But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
[8] (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles)
[9] And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
Paul actually communicated the gospel that he was preaching to James, Peter/Cephas, and John lest by any means he had been running in vain, so you might want to retract your erroneous statement.
-
1
- Show all