Did man land on the moon?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Did man land on the moon?

  • Total voters
    72
kinda said:
If you look at A, you will see that the gas pump casts a shadow in the opposite direction! There is only one light source on the moon, i.e. the Sun, and hence all shadows must be in the same direction. You can see that the shadows cast by all other objects are in the other direction. Some conclusive evidence that these pictures are doctored pictures.

gasstation2.jpg

https://homes.luddy.indiana.edu/kapadia/moon.html

Warning website has questionable humor content, enter at your own risk.
Click to expand...

The shiny foil on the space suit is reflecting the sunlight causing the shadow from the pump. No doctoring there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kinda
Billyd said:
The shiny foil on the space suit is reflecting the sunlight causing the shadow from the pump. No doctoring there.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah! lol Any conspiracy theorist, should know basic shiny foil characteristics. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billyd
kinda said:
Great site that shows both sides of the story.

http://moontruth.org/
Click to expand...
From the home page of the site:

Perpetuating the Perfect Hoax

NASA knows that some day, the Van Allen Belt problem will be solved and men will land on the Moon.

NASA has already declared the Apollo sites to be No Fly Zones, preventing close inspection forever.

The LMT Descent Module looks just like the one claimed to be used for the Apollo manned landings

The USA fooled Russia into spending billions to counter the "Star Wars" space shield in the 1980's.

-

Aaaand - the Perfect Hoax has been perpetuated on anyone who believes there is nothing wrong with the above statement.

Can you see the glaring error?
 
GaryA said:
From the home page of the site:

Perpetuating the Perfect Hoax

NASA knows that some day, the Van Allen Belt problem will be solved and men will land on the Moon.

NASA has already declared the Apollo sites to be No Fly Zones, preventing close inspection forever.

The LMT Descent Module looks just like the one claimed to be used for the Apollo manned landings

The USA fooled Russia into spending billions to counter the "Star Wars" space shield in the 1980's.

-

Aaaand - the Perfect Hoax has been perpetuated on anyone who believes there is nothing wrong with the above statement.

Can you see the glaring error?
Click to expand...


I'm not sure the Van Allen Belt issue will be solved anytime soon. Maybe in 100 years?!?!

I think China's moon rover exploration looks fake as well. I probably won't buy the moon landing stories, until they have passenger flights for newly weds. To many questionable stories.


The moon looks like earth, rocks and sand. Where are all those craters? Did they disappear? No stars?


Another obstacle they have to overcome is the environment of the moon. 250F in the sun and -250F in the shade on the moon. Can you imagine how quickly those space suits would have to adjust? Also, what about the radiation from the sun? The moon looks like it has been beaten up by asteroids, what about an asteroid shower while your on the moon?

A better place to explore would be the sea. First conquer the ocean depths, before trying to fly in the heavens.
 
This is pretty much the story of the moon landing in my opinion.

1614538927094.jpeg

C + rock = crock

Crock: something considered to be complete nonsense.
 
I think Fukushima could help play a roll in helping the space program. If they can create a robot to explore the Fukushima disaster in the reactor core, then they could possibly create a robot to land on the moon.


https://www.wired.com/story/fukushima-robot-cleanup/

Human beings couldn’t go into the heart of Fukushima’s reactors to find the missing fuel, though—at least not without absorbing a lethal dose of radiation. The job would have to be done by robots. But no robot had ever carried out such a mission before. Many had already tried and failed.


https://www.cnet.com/news/inside-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-power-station-nuclear-reactor-meltdown/
 
GaryA said:
From the home page of the site:

Perpetuating the Perfect Hoax

NASA knows that some day, the Van Allen Belt problem will be solved and men will land on the Moon.

NASA has already declared the Apollo sites to be No Fly Zones, preventing close inspection forever.

The LMT Descent Module looks just like the one claimed to be used for the Apollo manned landings

The USA fooled Russia into spending billions to counter the "Star Wars" space shield in the 1980's.

-

Aaaand - the Perfect Hoax has been perpetuated on anyone who believes there is nothing wrong with the above statement.

Can you see the glaring error?
Click to expand...
If we assume paragraph one to be stating the truth - then, we never went to the moon.

What Apollo sites ??? - if we never went to the moon...

What LMT Descent Module??? - if we never went to the moon...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moses_Young
GaryA said:
NASA knows that some day, the Van Allen Belt problem will be solved and men will land on the Moon.

NASA has already declared the Apollo sites to be No Fly Zones, preventing close inspection forever.
Click to expand...
No close inspection forever of sites that do not exist because we were never there.
 
GaryA said:
No close inspection forever of sites that do not exist because we were never there.
Click to expand...


This was brought up in some videos. We have the Hubble Telescope and some amazing telescopes on earth, it wouldn't be to difficult to aim these scopes at the moon, and see the flags on the moon, or something.

It further brings up questions, that will never really be answered.

On a side note, my neighbour awhile back, let me view the moon from his telescope, and it was amazing. You had to constantly move the telescope, because the moon was always moving.

Back to the topic, so according to the official story (at least what I was watching) the Lunar landing had to re-dock with the Columbia craft, while it was going 6,000 mph. This is another thing, that I don't think it's possible, but who am I to know what's right or wrong?
 
kinda said:
We have the Hubble Telescope and some amazing telescopes on earth, it wouldn't be to difficult to aim these scopes at the moon, and see the flags on the moon, or something.
Click to expand...
The Hubble Telescope is not really quite what you have been led to believe. However, your point is well made. You would think that a telescope [technology] capable of delivering such fantastic images of things that are supposedly multi-lightyears away (the images are not real, BTW) would be able to deliver the most amazing images of all of what is supposedly on the moon.

kinda said:
It further brings up questions, that will never really be answered.
Click to expand...
No doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kinda
GaryA said:
The Hubble Telescope is not really quite what you have been led to believe. However, your point is well made. You would think that a telescope [technology] capable of delivering such fantastic images of things that are supposedly multi-lightyears away (the images are not real, BTW) would be able to deliver the most amazing images of all of what is supposedly on the moon.


No doubt.
Click to expand...

Lots of questions that will never be answered, but science is fascinating, when you are allowed to think on your own. Science was way to boring in school.

37932ed6857efe46512762e84417be49.jpg


Hubble Telescope image of the moon.

NGC-2275-galaxy-hubble-1.jpg


So, we can get images of far away galaxies, but no close ups of the moon landing spots?!?! This would put skeptics in check, or at least clear up some questions.
 
The International Space Station is traveling 17,000 miles per hour and many ships have docked, so maybe speed isn't really a factor.


839196-3x2-940x627.jpg
 
kinda said:
The International Space Station is traveling 17,000 miles per hour and many ships have docked, so maybe speed isn't really a factor.
Click to expand...
Since there actually is no ISS "in orbit", then speed is not an issue. :D

Nothing but imagination runs that whole thing...
 
kinda said:
The International Space Station is traveling 17,000 miles per hour and many ships have docked, so maybe speed isn't really a factor.


839196-3x2-940x627.jpg
Click to expand...

Think relative speed. Also check out the photos taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Also do a deep dive into space ambient radiation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back