i learned a lot about covenant theology in the last few years and i'm not sure what you're saying is true. in general they believe in dozens of different covenants over the ages with the covenant of grace being the final one, which, if you read the scripture you see many covenants being mentioned besides the obvious one like that with Abraham or Israel at Sinai. the covenant of salt. the covenant with David. the covenant with Hagar. they also add 'implied' ones not spoken of in the Bible, like a perceived covenant with Adam that he would have eternal life as long as he never ate from the tree of surely die.
they don't see the Adamic or saline covenants as being tantamount to the covenant of Christ's blood, but precursors. so it's not much different than your hyperdispensationalism, in that they don't particularly regard the message from God to man as being a completely unified one.
we should keep in mind that there are more than two boxes to fit theologies in. you're not automatically 'covenant' theologian just because you're not 'dispensational' just like you're not necessarily 'Pelagian' just because your not 'Calvinist'
they don't see the Adamic or saline covenants as being tantamount to the covenant of Christ's blood, but precursors. so it's not much different than your hyperdispensationalism, in that they don't particularly regard the message from God to man as being a completely unified one.
we should keep in mind that there are more than two boxes to fit theologies in. you're not automatically 'covenant' theologian just because you're not 'dispensational' just like you're not necessarily 'Pelagian' just because your not 'Calvinist'
Covenant of works until the fall of Adam
Covenant of grace, after Genesis 3 all the way to now.
Covenant of redemption, between all 3 members of the Godhead.