A study is showing a verse with context.
So u want me to copy and paste whole chapters... LoL... Blease... U can just go and study it yourself if u like
A study is showing a verse with context.
Dodge..
Does being cast into the eternal lake of fire one of the judgements that is possible because of our works or lack there off?
Lets see if you dodge this one?
Call it what u like. Im simply admitting that I'm not infallible... Are you?
How much must you do to be saved?I'm not a Mormon. Im just reminding y'all that the bible clearly says that we will be judged on what we have done...
It was always the belief for 1,500 years before this notion of easy salvation came along
I'm sure glad our repenting doesn't save us.My repenting was farly simple but I do not believe we all have the same experience in repenting for our faith is individual yet the same for all.
Ignoring Paul is like Israel ignoring Moses .Both have been appointed and chosen by God .
If you are going to preach that a person is going to be judged by God on the day of judgement on their works you better be sure not to leave babes in Christ under the impression that they have just been told that their eternal salvation is dependent on their Works..
If you walk away from a babe in Christ leaving them convinced that performing works gets them saved then you have just placed a stumbling stone in front of them and seen to it that they no longer trust in the Atonement of the LORD Jesus Christ for their salvation..
You will be held responsible for how you have handled the Word of God..
How much must you do to be saved?
Clearly that's not what i meant. But posting a list of verses and then going " see " ,is not good . Thats called 'proof texting 'So u want me to copy and paste whole chapters... LoL... Blease... U can just go and study it yourself if u like
The four Gospels are transitional books ,as is Acts . Some miss this and instead read Paul's letters TO THE CHURCH as if what goes before is the ' greater teaching ' . The " I'm of Jesus " Crowd .Are you attempting to bait me? I said nothing against Paul in my post, rather I posted in reply to yours on the subject you posted, only emphasizing we should learn from the Teacher.
Did I allude to ignoring Paul because I suggested learning from the Master? Then I suppose I did ignore him, however I seem to learn and read ddfrom Paul daily as I do first fromthe Master.
Read and learn what Paul teaches on saying "I belong to Paul.... etc."
You seem to be in the wrong forum with that remark.The four Gospels are transitional books ,as is Acts . Some miss this and instead read Paul's letters TO THE CHURCH as if what goes before is the ' greater teaching ' . The " I'm of Jesus " Crowd .
Well ,you say that ,but when you talk to a Mormon you will notice which books they emphasis the most . They also do not rightly divide . They focus on the four gospels at the expense of Paul's letters. All cults do this.You seem to be in the wrong forum with that remark.
Clearly that's not what i meant. But posting a list of verses and then going " see " ,is not good . Thats called 'proof texting '
Well ,you say that ,but when you talk to a Mormon you will notice which books they emphasis the most . They also do not rightly divide . They focus on the four gospels at the expense of Paul's letters. All cults do this.
Well ,you say that ,but when you talk to a Mormon you will notice which books they emphasis the most . They also do not rightly divide
I agree with you on that with ' christianity ' and ' churches ' . The more we understand and rely on the bible and keep Jesus as our example we will never be disappointed or lose focus .Sounds like a very cheap way to dismiss verses that contradict your belief.
All u had to do was pick one and present an alternate explanation for it.
If you read what I wrote I never said: "see, blah blah blah". I said "Why, blah, blah, blah?"...
Huge difference as one is making an assertion while the other is asking a question...
I think someone said I was preaching but since when is asking a question considered preaching...
Im simply asking how people can dismiss so many contradicting verses and be so certain of themselves despite having the feeble mind of a human with very limited capacity and understanding...
U know our minds are 95% on cruise control. Operating from impulses just like every other animal.
So while you guys are so certain of yourselves and easily cast aside such verses, I cannot when I see reasonable doubt...
How about the idea of predestination? Jesus says that God chose us before we were even conceived, didn't he?
How can we be predestined yet have to rely on faith or works?
I honestly think the whole topic has been blown out of proportion and its become very tribal.
Catholics vs Protestants, us vs them. It seems to have very little to do with salvation and more about trying to discredit the other.
I mean, u don't go around arguing against Muslims or Hindus, do u? They have much less in common then why not attack them?
The whole thing has done nothing but divide us... U think God divides us? U know who the author of division is, right?
Then why fight amongst yourselves for? Thats exactly what Satan wants and he's done it very well chopping us all up into 40,000 denominations... I find it very disheartening... 2 years ago I thought there were only 4 or 5 and that they were all friends... It really hurts learning that the evil one is here as well, he is everywhere
The more I learn about Christianity the sicker i seem to get... I wholeheartedly believe in God but I have no idea where I belong, which church I should attend, they all seem as bad as each other and all this petty arguing over little details is nauseating.
We're all baptized, we all love Christ we all want to do good... So whats the big deal...
There is none for me apart from all this fighting... Im over it mate...
Anyway, no offence, Godspeed and God bless
I don't know what ' hyper dispos hold to as it varies depending on whos explaining it ? But if the bible says in Galations that its an anathema to preach another Gospel other than the one delivered by Paul then we need to find out which Gospel he delivered them . 1 cor 15 . 1-4 is not luke 9.6isn't the hyper-dispensationalism you described doing exactly the same thing you're saying is wrong?
like, if you say "Paul's is the only gospel with which we have to do" haven't you divided scripture against itself, wrongly?
They camp out in the book of Matthew and the book of James to push a works orientated Gospel. Many denominations do the same .they sure don't like it when you quote Jeremiah to them.
smh
1 cor 15 . 1-4 is not luke 9.6
