I'm not sure whether she is pastoring the clothing, or the rock.Just getting the washing done alright? 1st century style
![]()
I'm not sure whether she is pastoring the clothing, or the rock.Just getting the washing done alright? 1st century style
![]()
One of the only versions that says they "took him home" in Acts 18:26 is the NIV. Meanwhile, other versions like the ESV, KJV, NASB, and most others suggest Priscilla and Aquilla "took him [Apollo's] aside" after he was done preaching (meaning they were still in the synagogue contextually) and expounded upon Christ to him. You're cherry picking the version that fits your narrative.
Even if they were in a home setting then it wouldn't make a difference. There are not different rules for being within an assembly than there are for being outside of an assembly because in One Body in Christ we are already assembled.
Acts 2:17 absolutely talks about females 'speaking what God has revealed.' This is the very definition of the word prophesy. This means that there will be women speaking to people (men, women, and children) what is in the Bible. What did you think it meant?
Galatians 3:28 "...there is neither male not female..." meaning gender is irrelevant. If it's irrelevant to God then it should be irrelevant to us.
Yes some things are a matter of conscience. Some things that are sins for you may not necessarily be sins for me.
Romans 14:22-23
22Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth. 23And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.
Perhaps she is basing her teaching on the rock. boom boom!I'm not sure whether she is pastoring the clothing, or the rock.![]()
Sorry but you are wrong. I have not cherry picked as I generally use the Greek Version.
They were in the synagogue. That is not the church. So it would make a difference if they were in a home. So, sorry you are wrong.
We are not talking about prophesy which is different to teaching so sorry but you are wrong.
Of course gender is irrelevant when it comes to salvation but we are not talkikng about salvation so sorry but you are wrong.
We are not talking about sin so sorry but you are wrong.
Perhaps you need to go back to Genesis and review why Eve was made for Adam.
When Eve was made for Adam, the term used to describe her role was ezer kenegdo.
Re: Hebrew ezer kenegdo. In Genesis 2:18, the word "helpmeet" does not occur. The Hebrew expression ezer kenegdo appears, meaning "one who is the same as the other and who surrounds, protects, aids, helps, supports." There is no indication of inferiority or of a secondary position in an hierarchical separation of the male and female "spheres" of responsibility, authority, or social position.
The word ezer is used twice in the Old Testament to refer to the female and 14 times to refer to God.
For example, in the Psalms when David says, "The Lord is my Helper," he uses the word ezer.
Click
and click again.
Are you kidding me? Nobody does.Sorry, but no thanks. I'll just stick with what the Bible says.
It is not my intention to cause an argument or division among the faithful with that question just discussion in a Christian and civil manner.
I have always simply posted the Word of God as it is written. I post this question in order to properly attempt to teach the Word of God....PEROID!
1 Timothy 3:1-2.........
"This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach".
According to the written Word of God, a Pastor can only be a "Male/Man".
Now, before anyone argues that point or disagree with me, remember that the "One" who said..."In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" also was the "One" who said......
"if a "MAN" desire the office of a bishop".
The old Major did not have anything whatsoever to do with what Jesus Christ placed into the Word of God. The old Major just reads it and accepts it as it is written so your disagreements will be with Christ and not me!!!!
Now the question must be WHY would God do that?
1 Timothy 2:13-14 .....
"For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression."
It’s important to understand that Paul does not prohibit women from teaching in all contexts (Titus 2:3; Acts 18:25-26), only from teaching the Bible to men in the church.
Notice that Paul prohibits women from doing two distinct things.
1.
Women may not teach the Bible to men in the church.
2.
Women may not exercise authority over men in the church.
Teaching and exercising authority in the church are the two primary responsibilities of elders, pastors, or bishops. Thus, women are not to hold the office of pastor, but neither are they to perform these particular functions of a pastor over men in the church.
Again, for the inquisitive minds the question is still...WHY is that the case.
I will give you what I think is the reason behinds God's direction.
1.
The creation order is the first reason Paul gives for prohibiting women from teaching or exercising authority in the church.
Paul doesn’t ground his command in cultural considerations or a particular problem with the women in the Ephesian church. Rather, he grounds his command in creation. He says that the reason women are not to teach or exercise authority over men in the church is that....
“Adam was formed first, then Eve”. Paul means that God established Adam as the head and authority of his wife, Eve. God designed men to lead.
2.
The nature of women is the second reason Paul gives for prohibiting them from teaching or exercising authority in the church.
Paul says, “Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor” (1 Tim 2:14). Paul is saying something about the natural constitution of men and women, that men as a class are naturally more fitted to teach and have authority in the church, but women are not.
Dr. Wayne Grudem says, “This is by far the most common viewpoint in the history of the interpretation of this passage” (Evangelical Feminism & Biblical Truth 70).
The curse is removed? I think you need to take the verses you posted and place them each within their proper context.a makes dominion over a female is part of the curse
“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”
Genesis 3:16 KJV
but the curse is removed
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
Galatians 3:28 KJV
and at the same time Paul wrote this
“In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But with good works.
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.”
1 Timothy 2:9-15
it seems there is a conflict in Paul’s thinking either one way or the other . On one hand he is saying there’s no difference in Christ between a male and female which takes us back to before the curse
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion...
Genesis 1:27-28 KJV
At this point it seems they are equals both made in his image both blessed and given dominion Adam being made first is part of Paul’s argument Eve was born of adams flesh but then later Paul explains that as woman was born of man in the beginning so man is now born from women’s flesh as she came from adams flesh So there is a unity and delendance on one another a
Man can’t exist without a woman and woman can’t exist without a man she came from him and then Cain came from her
he also at times makes the point “ I am saying this thing , not the lord but I say it “ he does this a couple times not here though he says “ I do not permit “ and then goves Timothy his reasoning
This is a good question I think I would listen to a woman if she was preaching a good message that was edifying , because I think the curse is gone in Christ and flesh doesn’t matter
but I could never tell
Anyone that is right , because of what Paul is explaining there . Good subject I think I’ll follow the posts and see what others think
good post for discussion I hope it stays peaceful
Are you kidding me? Nobody does.
The curse is removed? I think you need to take the verses you posted and place them each within their proper context.
Start with the curse. We all still physically face death, do we not? We all still suffer, do we not? Is there no more sin?
The “go to”— the one so may like to post about “there is no male, female, Jew, bond, free, Greek.” I can assure you that the secular world loves to hear those words. They take them literally and have just passed a Federal law which says, that gender is whatever we wish it to be.
There is no obstacle to salvation- to having peace with God and receiving the peace of God. We all have access, no matter who we are. BUT, to use that verse to obliterate all distinctions is nonsense.
There are briars in my backyard-big ones, and there is sin in the world. Untill Jesus makes His final judgements upon the world, the curse is indeed ever present- and yet God has also provided the antidote-the solution, in the person of Jesus- The Christ.
What many people overlook is that God specifically cursed the serpent and the ground, but He did not "curse" the woman or the man. He did, however, tell them what the consequences of their actions would be. It baffles me that people don't think through the context of those statements and instead assume that they mean God gave men authority over women. They say nothing of the sort.“Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:”
Galatians 3:13 KJV
The curse began here
“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it:
cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.” Genesis 3:16-20 KJV
What many people overlook is that God specifically cursed the serpent and the ground, but He did not "curse" the woman or the man. He did, however, tell them what the consequences of their actions would be. It baffles me that people don't think through the context of those statements and instead assume that they mean God gave men authority over women. They say nothing of the sort.
Probably about a hundred years ago. They have undermined the sovereignty of Gods word for a very long time.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
I fear that your seminary time is making you very ecumenical. We are told to come out from among them and be separate unto the Lord not embrace them and join in their errors. Touch not the unclean thing.I went to a Pentecostal Church from when God saved me, for 15 years. I also took courses on their theological distinctives, and history.
Roger, you do have all truth, I'm sorry to tell you. So before you throw stones at other Protestant groups, I suggest you be much more careful. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones!
I fear that your seminary time is making you very ecumenical. We are told to come out from among them and be separate unto the Lord not embrace them and join in their errors. Touch not the unclean thing.
Let's promote peace and unity in the purity and holiness of Christ. We need sanctification through the teaching of God's word.
Avoid entanglement in the denominations for in their desire to be big they have forsaken the Spirit and the Truth. Love them but do not embrace their errors.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
You bring up an interesting point. But Paul does not indicate anything like that in his doctrinal declarations in this matter. The underlying premise is that women should not have authority over man. Paul elaborates upon this in no uncertain terms.......1 Tim 2:12 et.al.Traditions are interesting. We know from the first few Centuries (Church Father's era) only a few people of most populations could actually read. Generally, the only people who owned Bibles were the ones who could read them. And that led to even worse traditions.
I said that to say this, maybe the majority of women could not read in Paul's day. The Disciples show their knowledge of the Tanakh so Yiddish men probably were the educated ones (Paul is a great example of being educated in the Torah). Maybe part of Paul's statement here is based upon who can read God's Word vs who could not (back then).
Today, everyone can basically read enough to survive. Much different than 1,600 - 5,000 years ago.
I've heard that argument many times and it has never proven true.Don't patronize me! God is the one leading me on this new path. If Christians don't find commonalities and emphasize them, we are not doing God's will.
I do agree we are always to be wary of apostates and outright heresy. But evangelicalism is not supposed to stand alone! We are to work with everyone who is a child of God, not just those who fit into our little cult.
So beware, Roger that being so narrow minded and insular likely means you are in a cult!