THIRD TEMPLE NEWS

[VCO]

It is my understanding that the new Sanhedrin have note concluded the proper location....to date.
They do feel they have the Red Heifer now.

They have had two for a couple of YEARS now, and a newborn calf has been declared a viable RED HEIFER. That is not the problem. The problem is it must take place on top of the Mt. of Olives, as the Priests have to enter the TEMPLE Sanctified by the ashes mixed in spring water. How do you cross all those GRAVES, without defiling the Priests, as they believe it is defiling to cross a graveyard, and to the North is a settlement Muslims, and to cross there would being equally Defiled.


That is almost all GRAVES of people who wanted to be buried there, surrounding most of the Mt. of Olives.

There is barely enough room on that lawn up top the Mt. of Olives to set up a TABERNACLE, for the Red Heifer Sacrifice.



You see from that top of Mt. of Olives is where the Tabernacle is supposed to be, so the Red Heifer, they think washing in the Gihon Spring water mixed with it, will sanctify the Priests. Now how do you get the Priests back to the Temple, without crossing a graveyard or Muslim Land, which they think is defiling to them ? ? ? If you do not know that North and East and South of the Mt. of Olives, belongs to JORDAN.

That is why the STALL on building the THIRD TEMPLE, because of this ongoing debate. Now I do not know, but I SUSPECT, the Sanhedrin will build a helicopter of all parts from ISRAEL, declare it Kosher for the Priests to travel in without defilement, and fly them back to the TEMPLE.

 

[shittim]

Maybe this?

 

[VCO]

Maybe this?

That is off SUBJECT, but Interesting.

And a catastrophic malfunction in the JET Packs;

AND YOU DROP LIKE A ROCK!

 

[shittim]

That WAS the topic, getting the priest from point A to point B without defiling themselves by walking on the ground, looks like it is from touching, moving, overshadowed etc. and not by by passing over without contact.
Don't be so rigid, that is how the Scribes Pharisees missed the mark when Jesus was among them.
best wishes

 

[VCO]

That WAS the topic, getting the priest from point A to point B without defiling themselves by walking on the ground, looks like it is from touching, moving, overshadowed etc. and not by by passing over without contact.
Don't be so rigid, that is how the Scribes Pharisees missed the mark when Jesus was among them.
best wishes

LOL

 

[Phoneman-777]

THIRD TEMPLE - Has to be built on the site of Solomon's TEMPLE

Imagine a person sits down and writes a song about raping women, murdering pre-schoolers, torturing elderly people, offering children in Satanic sacrifice, etc. After he finishes, he writes the title at the top of the page, "A Psalm of God". Sounds like a pretty outrageous title for such a song, right?

Equally outrageous is the idea that God would inspire Paul to entitle a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem -- in which the sacrifices offered therein would be a national, collective rejection of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and an official Jewish finger in the face of God -- as "the Temple of God"...yet that is exactly the sentiment of many Christians today who are following the errors of Dispensationalism.

The "Temple of God' is not some brick and mortal structure that may or may not be rebuilt - it is what the New Testament over and over says it is: the Church. The Church is "a building fitly framed together that groweth into a holy temple (Greek: "NAOS") of the Lord." And "NAOS" is the exact same word Paul uses when he wrote, "...sitteth in the temple of God showing himself that he is God."

 

[Scribe]

Imagine a person sits down and writes a song about raping women, murdering pre-schoolers, torturing elderly people, offering children in Satanic sacrifice, etc. After he finishes, he writes the title at the top of the page, "A Psalm of God". Sounds like a pretty outrageous title for such a song, right?

Equally outrageous is the idea that God would inspire Paul to entitle a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem -- in which the sacrifices offered therein would be a national, collective rejection of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and an official Jewish finger in the face of God -- as "the Temple of God"...yet that is exactly the sentiment of many Christians today who are following the errors of Dispensationalism.

The "Temple of God' is not some brick and mortal structure that may or may not be rebuilt - it is what the New Testament over and over says it is: the Church. The Church is "a building fitly framed together that groweth into a holy temple (Greek: "NAOS") of the Lord." And "NAOS" is the exact same word Paul uses when he wrote, "...sitteth in the temple of God showing himself that he is God."

He was teaching from Daniel so it was what it meant in Daniels time which was the physical temple. There was also a temple still standing when Paul wrote so his readers would have understood it as that temple not a spiritual description of our bodies. If that is what Paul meant he would have given an indication that he was interpreting Daniel in that way.

That prophesy would be fulfilled literally is not an approval of what the Jews will be doing when they build the third temple but simply a foreknowledge of the fact that they will. It is not a strong argument to say that Paul referencing the prophecy of Daniel is equal to Paul saying that God is going to approve or condone the Jews attempts to continue the Temple religion and ignore Christ. They are already doing that. God is not condoning it he is foretelling it.

Your analogy does not make sense to anyone but you and it is a bit graphic and offensive. That is the second time in the last two days someone has decided to use the R word in their effort to make their point. And neither attempt made any sense or applied to the subject at all.

 

[Phoneman-777]

He was teaching from Daniel so it was what it meant in Daniels time which was the physical temple. There was also a temple still standing when Paul wrote so his readers would have understood it as that temple not a spiritual description of our bodies. If that is what Paul meant he would have given an indication that he was interpreting Daniel in that way.

That prophesy would be fulfilled literally is not an approval of what the Jews will be doing when they build the third temple but simply a foreknowledge of the fact that they will. It is not a strong argument to say that Paul referencing the prophecy of Daniel is equal to Paul saying that God is going to approve or condone the Jews attempts to continue the Temple religion and ignore Christ. They are already doing that. God is not condoning it he is foretelling it.

Your analogy does not make sense to anyone but you and it is a bit graphic and offensive. That is the second time in the last two days someone has decided to use the R word in their effort to make their point. And neither attempt made any sense or applied to the subject at all.

Hey brother Scribe, Happy Sabbath! God's favorite number in the Bible is "7". It's the number of "completion" or "perfection". The 7 "temples" in Scripture are:

1. OT Mobile Sanctuary
2. Temple Solomon built
3. Temple Zerubabbel built that was beautified by Herod
4. Jesus' body
5. Our body
6. The church body
7. The Heavenly Sanctuary in which Jesus now ministers as High Priest

No room for some blasphemous, irrelevant Jerusalem temple in God's company.

 

[VCO]

He was teaching from Daniel so it was what it meant in Daniels time which was the physical temple. There was also a temple still standing when Paul wrote so his readers would have understood it as that temple not a spiritual description of our bodies. If that is what Paul meant he would have given an indication that he was interpreting Daniel in that way.

That prophesy would be fulfilled literally is not an approval of what the Jews will be doing when they build the third temple but simply a foreknowledge of the fact that they will. It is not a strong argument to say that Paul referencing the prophecy of Daniel is equal to Paul saying that God is going to approve or condone the Jews attempts to continue the Temple religion and ignore Christ. They are already doing that. God is not condoning it he is foretelling it.

Your analogy does not make sense to anyone but you and it is a bit graphic and offensive. That is the second time in the last two days someone has decided to use the R word in their effort to make their point. And neither attempt made any sense or applied to the subject at all.

No, this is Not a tread that is a Discussion about PROPHESY in the BIBLE. It is NEWS FROM ISRAEL about THEIR PLANS to Build the Third Temple. Many Christians would be interest in that, because we know that around the time that the JEWS build a THIRD TEMPLE is what the Rapture will HAPPEN. The Sanhedrin are planning to build the TEMPLE on the WRONG SITE, up near the Dome of the ROCK. Some JEWISH Archaeologists have made a LOT of discoveries IN RECENT YEARS, that seem to prove the TEMPLE was 400 to 600 feet SOUTH of the modern Jerusalem Southern wall, in the City of David.

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Imagine a person sits down and writes a song about raping women, murdering pre-schoolers, torturing elderly people, offering children in Satanic sacrifice, etc. After he finishes, he writes the title at the top of the page, "A Psalm of God". Sounds like a pretty outrageous title for such a song, right?

Equally outrageous is the idea that God would inspire Paul to entitle a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem -- in which the sacrifices offered therein would be a national, collective rejection of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and an official Jewish finger in the face of God -- as "the Temple of God"...yet that is exactly the sentiment of many Christians today who are following the errors of Dispensationalism.

The "Temple of God' is not some brick and mortal structure that may or may not be rebuilt - it is what the New Testament over and over says it is: the Church. The Church is "a building fitly framed together that groweth into a holy temple (Greek: "NAOS") of the Lord." And "NAOS" is the exact same word Paul uses when he wrote, "...sitteth in the temple of God showing himself that he is God."

Interesting yu should ask

david was a murderer and an adulterer, and as king you could proclaim he was. Rapist, because no woman would reject him out of fear.

and how many psalms did he write?

the temple never took away sin, it was always a symbol, it will be a symbol again when Christ himself returns, Israel repents and he set it his throne in what he himself called, his fathers house,

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Hey brother Scribe, Happy Sabbath! God's favorite number in the Bible is "7". It's the number of "completion" or "perfection". The 7 "temples" in Scripture are:

1. OT Mobile Sanctuary
2. Temple Solomon built
3. Temple Zerubabbel built that was beautified by Herod
4. Jesus' body
5. Our body
6. The church body
7. The Heavenly Sanctuary in which Jesus now ministers as High Priest

No room for some blasphemous, irrelevant Jerusalem temple in God's company.

Wow, you really have “Tude”. FYI, this is a news thread not a prophecy thread, please try to pay attention,

secondly,

god said their will be a new temple. That is ALL that matters, I will not question what God said, I will do what many in the time of Jesus did not do, hence rejecting their messiah and take him at his word

 

[Phoneman-777]

No, this is Not a tread that is a Discussion about PROPHESY in the BIBLE. It is NEWS FROM ISRAEL about THEIR PLANS to Build the Third Temple. Many Christians would be interest in that, because we know that around the time that the JEWS build a THIRD TEMPLE is what the Rapture will HAPPEN. The Sanhedrin are planning to build the TEMPLE on the WRONG SITE, up near the Dome of the ROCK. Some JEWISH Archaeologists have made a LOT of discoveries IN RECENT YEARS, that seem to prove the TEMPLE was 400 to 600 feet SOUTH of the modern Jerusalem Southern wall, in the City of David.

How do we know this exactly?

 

[Phoneman-777]

Interesting yu should ask

david was a murderer and an adulterer, and as king you could proclaim he was. Rapist, because no woman would reject him out of fear.

and how many psalms did he write?

the temple never took away sin, it was always a symbol, it will be a symbol again when Christ himself returns, Israel repents and he set it his throne in what he himself called, his fathers house,

Apples and oranges, my friend I think we both know that David didn't glorify his sinful escapades in song and title them as "holy songs for God"...and he certainly wasn't writing Godly songs while in a state of full on rebellion to God, the state of which the nation of Israel is in today.

God would not inspire Paul to call a blasphemous, heretical, tragically conceived, Jewish colossal monument to theological error "the Temple of God". Paul was referring to the Church over which the Antichrist now sits and is responsible for seducing millions with the nonsense of Jesuit Futurism.

 

[Scribe]

Hey brother Scribe, Happy Sabbath! God's favorite number in the Bible is "7". It's the number of "completion" or "perfection". The 7 "temples" in Scripture are:

1. OT Mobile Sanctuary
2. Temple Solomon built
3. Temple Zerubabbel built that was beautified by Herod
4. Jesus' body
5. Our body
6. The church body
7. The Heavenly Sanctuary in which Jesus now ministers as High Priest

No room for some blasphemous, irrelevant Jerusalem temple in God's company.

So what will you do if the Jews do rebuild one?

 

[Phoneman-777]

Wow, you really have “Tude”. FYI, this is a news thread not a prophecy thread, please try to pay attention,

secondly,

god said their will be a new temple. That is ALL that matters, I will not question what God said, I will do what many in the time of Jesus did not do, hence rejecting their messiah and take him at his word

The voice in your head reads my posts with "tude". I assure you, I'm only trying to gently encourage you Jewish Temple guys to step out of your echo chamber and consider that for hundreds of years, the Protestant Reformers were well aware of this nonsense you guys now promote as "Biblical theology", understood that it is Jesuit in origin, and yet soundly rejected it based on the Scriptures; a fact that most Jewish Temple guys today don't know about.

Does not this warrant investigation, seeing that thousands like Luther, Calvin, Tyndale, Zwingli, Spurgeon, Isaac Newton, even former President Lincoln would all be grabbing you violently by the collar and asking you if you if you've all gone crazy?

 

[Scribe]

No, this is Not a tread that is a Discussion about PROPHESY in the BIBLE. It is NEWS FROM ISRAEL about THEIR PLANS to Build the Third Temple. Many Christians would be interest in that, because we know that around the time that the JEWS build a THIRD TEMPLE is what the Rapture will HAPPEN. The Sanhedrin are planning to build the TEMPLE on the WRONG SITE, up near the Dome of the ROCK. Some JEWISH Archaeologists have made a LOT of discoveries IN RECENT YEARS, that seem to prove the TEMPLE was 400 to 600 feet SOUTH of the modern Jerusalem Southern wall, in the City of David.

Did you just say "No" to me? Do you have dogs?
LOL

It is in the Bible Discussion forum so like it or not people are going to discuss what the bible says about a rebuilding of the temple. And it is impossible to separate the discussion of news concerning the rebuilding of the temple in Israel and what the Bible says about that in prophecy.

Maybe you should have started it in "Christian News" forum, not that it would make any difference. People are going to give their views about what the bible says about a third temple no matter where you start such a thread. Why would you even think they wouldn't?

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Apples and oranges, my friend I think we both know that David didn't glorify his sinful escapades in song and title them as "holy songs for God"...and he certainly wasn't writing Godly songs while in a state of full on rebellion to God, the state of which the nation of Israel is in today.

your writes he took ownership not only of these sins but how sinful he was., are you able to do this?

the state of Israel is right where God said it would be, I am surprised you can not see this. They will be in this state until the time of the gentile has been completed,

God would not inspire Paul to call a blasphemous, heretical, tragically conceived, Jewish colossal monument to theological error "the Temple of God". Paul was referring to the Church over which the Antichrist now sits and is responsible for seducing millions with the nonsense of Jesuit Futurism.

yawn..

paul told us the truth

they are loved because of the promises, but HATED because of the gospel (because being blinded in part they have rejected the gospel)

paul was not referring to the church my friend, as you are with sin, you are mistaken

 

[eternally-gratefull]

The voice in your head reads my posts with "tude". I assure you, I'm only trying to gently encourage you Jewish Temple guys to step out of your echo chamber and consider that for hundreds of years, the Protestant Reformers were well aware of this nonsense you guys now promote as "Biblical theology", understood that it is Jesuit in origin, and yet soundly rejected it based on the Scriptures; a fact that most Jewish Temple guys today don't know about.

Does not this warrant investigation, seeing that thousands like Luther, Calvin, Tyndale, Zwingli, Spurgeon, Isaac Newton, even former President Lincoln would all be grabbing you violently by the collar and asking you if you if you've all gone crazy?

It’s ok, we expect people like you to have tude,

if I had a faith I could not really and truly prove I would have tude also.it’s a defense mechanism.

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Did you just say "No" to me? Do you have dogs?
LOL

It is in the Bible Discussion forum so like it or not people are going to discuss what the bible says about a rebuilding of the temple. And it is impossible to separate the discussion of news concerning the rebuilding of the temple in Israel and what the Bible says about that in prophecy.

Maybe you should have started it in "Christian News" forum, not that it would make any difference. People are going to give their views about what the bible says about a third temple no matter where you start such a thread. Why would you even think they wouldn't?

I think he just like to keep his thread on topic of the op.

like most people Do.

sadly your right, people are still gonna say what they want

 

[Phoneman-777]

So what will you do if the Jews do rebuild one?

Whatever they build there, it can't be referred to as "the Temple of God" any more than a stopped-up toilet can be called "the Lavar of God" or a golden seven-bong hashish pipe could be called "the candlestick of God".