So you taking over my discussion topic correct?we can substitute the word atonement; it's similar enough for the purpose of discussing the implication of 1 John 2:2
where/how was atonement made by Christ Jesus?
So you taking over my discussion topic correct?we can substitute the word atonement; it's similar enough for the purpose of discussing the implication of 1 John 2:2
where/how was atonement made by Christ Jesus?
So you taking over my discussion topic correct?
Let's discuss post 435um, yes i am speaking directly to the thread topic, like a good little forum member.
so -- we could go lots of places to answer, 'where/how was atonement made by Christ Jesus' with the same net result -- let's arbitrarily go here:
For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness (Romans 3:22-25) that's NKJV; NIV & a few others have 'sacrifice of atonement' instead of propitiation, handily justifying my using the word in a substitutionary ((get it?)) way. the Greek is literally 'mercy seat' interestingly enough, which Weymouth, YLT & Darby faithfully put.
so here's where we are -- 1 John 2:2 tells us that Christ is the mercy-seat/propitiation/atoning sacrifice for not only those who put their faith in Him ((re: 1 John 5:13)) but also for the whole world, which is spoken of in no uncertain terms as being those outside the faith.
Romans 3:25 tells us that this mercy-seat/propitiation/atoning sacrifice is by His blood.
so we have two places that can have taken place -- at the cross, or at the heavenly altar where He presented His blood shed at the cross. if we examine the figure presented by the law, both the sacrifice & the sprinkling of blood take place in the temple - so it's hardly material which which of these we settle on for where that atonement took place, at least for the purposes of 1 John 2:2 and the thread topic.
→ Christ died not only for His sheep but for those who are not His sheep. that's what scripture says.
i would like to ask how you get out of this conclusion?
and i would like to ask your opinion on the implications of this conclusion..?
the matter of how it is that this atonement is effective for the believer but ineffective for the unbeliever ((re: John 8:24)) is a separate matter, IMHO
18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
19But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God. 35
Thats fluff talk .Nothing taken out of the context of scripture truth. All scripture is profitable for doctrine and much more. Isaiah is scripture, it's uniform with NT scripture on Salvation issues
More evasion tactics.equivalent to Romans 3:25 insomuch as it touches on 1 John 2:2
redemption is via propitiation/mercy-seat/atoning-sacrifice through faith by the shed/sprinkled blood of Christ.
1 John 2:2 says this blood was shed not only for the believer ((re: 1 John 5:13)) but also the unbeliever ((vis a vis 'the whole world'))
If that's what you think of scripture, that is your problemThats fluff talk .
And you can not read properlyYou lack understanding, I said unbeiief isn't the unpardonable sin.
Let’s see if he answered you or sidesteps the question again like he did mewe can substitute the word atonement; it's similar enough for the purpose of discussing the implication of 1 John 2:2
where/how was atonement made by Christ Jesus?
Just like I said.side step.So you taking over my discussion topic correct?
what a joke.If that's what you think of scripture, that is your problem
Context and calvinism never go together. never , not once .If that's what you think of scripture, that is your problem
So you scoff the scriptures calling them calvinism. That gives you the right to ignore them when they go against your false beliefs. I get it.Context and calvinism never go together. never , not once .
9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood,Christs death accomplished/effected both Justification and Reconciliation for them He died for, His Elect Rom 5:9-11
9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. 10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. 11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement/reconciliation.44
Its not a problem for me . I'm not bound to confessions, traditions Augustines philosophy and men of old with beards .So you scoff the scriptures calling them calvinism. That gives you the right to ignore them when they go against your false beliefs. I get it.
You are wrong as usual. All are not reconciled while being enemies. The promise to the reconciled while being enemies is they shall be saved by His life. Are you a universalist?9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood,
THIS HAPPENED WHEN WE BELIEVED .
we shall be saved from wrath through him.
SAVED ,AFTER BELIEVING .
10 For if, when we were enemies,
THATS EVERYONE , HEAD FOR HEAD
we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son,
READ 2COR 5.19 HE RECONCILED THE WORLD ..
much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
RESURRECTION
11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now!!!
AFTER BELIEVING READ EPH 1.12-13
received the atonement/reconciliation.
Once again, this is speaking of the end result for us as a group of peopleChrists death accomplished/effected both Justification and Reconciliation for them He died for, His Elect Rom 5:9-11
9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. 10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. 11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement/reconciliation.44
Again, I just have to laughSo you scoff the scriptures calling them calvinism. That gives you the right to ignore them when they go against your false beliefs. I get it.
We were reconciled when we came to faithYou are wrong as usual. All are not reconciled while being enemies. The promise to the reconciled while being enemies is they shall be saved by His life. Are you a universalist?