You were not saved 2000 years ago . Thats when he died .It did not?
then how was I saved apart from the death of Christ?
You were not saved 2000 years ago . Thats when he died .It did not?
then how was I saved apart from the death of Christ?
We cannot be saved without his death. But his death did not save you .It did not?
then how was I saved apart from the death of Christ?
Without the cross, I could not be saved.You were not saved 2000 years ago . Thats when he died .
Actually, yeah it did, not by itself agreed, but to say it did not removes it from the equationWe cannot be saved without his death. But his death did not save you .
There is no ill will felt from them because they do not believe there is a heaven or hell. or even a spiritual God.I do, your God sends people to hell when he could have had the power to save them but chose not to even give them a chance
You agreed with my post, and I am agreeing with this post. We can agree on some things.Without the cross, I could not be saved.
so to say the cross did nothing save anyone is just crazy. No one is saved without the cross. Everyone who is saved is because of the cross
Romans 1 says differently, thATS why they can not use the excuse they did not know on judgment day, because they know GOD HAS SHOWN IT TO THEMThere is no ill will felt from them because they do not believe there is a heaven or hell. or even a spiritual God.
What kind of a God would he be to let people suffer everlasting torment, when he has the power to take them to live in heaven?
Your equation is where we disagree.Actually, yeah it did, not by itself agreed, but to say it did not removes it from the equation
I have no I’ll will with any of my calvinist brother or sisters, they are my family, we just disagree in The processYou agreed with my post, and I am agreeing with this post. We can agree on some things.
Are you interested in the op discussion?So you were saved 2000 years ago were you? interesting.
i think it is the application that we didagreeYour equation is where we disagree.
Seems to me he is trying to discuss the op with you.Are you interested in the op discussion?
when Jesus died you were not saved . That is my reasoning.Actually, yeah it did, not by itself agreed, but to say it did not removes it from the equation
One of the illogical inconsistencies non-believers present is a desire to go to heavenThere is no ill will felt from them because they do not believe there is a heaven or hell. or even a spiritual God.
We are saved by his life not his death . If he did not rise then we would be all lost .Without the cross, I could not be saved.
so to say the cross did nothing save anyone is just crazy. No one is saved without the cross. Everyone who is saved is because of the cross
Then say it, say the cross alone did not save you or something to that affectwhen Jesus died you were not saved . That is my reasoning.
Not even sure how they can think this, what about all the unbelievers Who want to go to heaven. But follow religion instead of the gospel.One of the illogical inconsistencies non-believers present is a desire to go to heaven
They think God a big meanie because He will not allow them
entrance even though they refuse to acknowledge His existence![]()
if he did not die, we would all be lost. So it is his death (the lamb of God) his ressurection and ultimately the offer of the gift and how we react to the offer,We are saved by his life not his death . If he did not rise then we would be all lost .