The childish nature of your questions. You wish to play word games taking advantage of the English translations of the Greek.
I was pointing out your inconsistent reasoning. If that seems childish to you, maybe you are not mature enough in your reasoning to see the problem. You are the one playing games with words.
Tongues are languages. Interpretation of those languages in the modern era is a learned gift.
Do you think it is the charism/gift in scripture or not? If it is, then how can you say it has ceased?
Apostolic tongues and interpretation were given by the Holy Spirit in a unique fashion. Such unique gifts have ended. Ecstatic utterances were never apart of biblical tongues not the modern concept of praying in tongues.
I'm not sure why you would call tongues 'apostolic' since scripture is clear that there were non-apostles who spoke in tongues, e.g. I Corinthians 12:28. Tongues are and were not 'ecstatic utterances' unless the person speaking them was in an ecstatic state, and since the native language could be spoken either in an ecstatic or nonestatic state, calling tongues 'ecstatic utterances' does not accomplish much. How emotional does one have to be to be 'ecstatic'? Is the excitement of a country Baptist preacher who says 'anduh' instead of 'and' really loudly 'ecstacy' or does one have to have a visionary experience or be in a trance? Use of terms like 'ecstatic utterances' are not helpful since they do not have much to do with the discussion of the Biblical gift.
Prophecy as in giving new or unique revelation has ended. Prophecy as in teaching forth the delivered word of God continues.
It's a game of fizbin to you. Do you think prophecy in the scripture refers to preaching or giving revelations? I think the problem is that you do not know what 'prophesy' means in scripture.
Peter gives us a good understanding of the term when he says, "but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." In that context he was speaking of prophecies given in past ages, but the New Testament uses the same word for 'prophet', and 'prophecy' to refer to Old Testament manifestations to refer to New Testament manifestations. Whether prophesying is about the secrets of an individual's heart in the present (e.g. I Corinthians 14:25) or the future (Acts 21:22), it involves the moving of the Spirit, and prophesying is revelatory in nature (I Corinthians 14:30.) Your focusing on the content of the prophecy. It's all the same thing--prophesying-- whether it is about past, present, or future. Old Testament prophets gave some prophecies that were not specifically about the future and some that were. The element genuine prophecies have in common is that the prophets is speaking a message from God given by supernatural means.
If prophesying is still done as 'speaking the word of God' now, then it is still revelatory in nature, with the Spirit revealing to the one prophesying what message to speak.
You antics may be tolerated in the house church but in the greater body of Christ not so much.
I'm not sure if you demonstrate the same rude smugness about being wrong in your own church that you do online, but I suspect some group somewhere tolerates you.