Who will Win
- Thread starter JJay
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
E
You forgot this part ..... seems you are willing to draw allegiance with some of those worthless souls on occasion when it suits your purpose... her words are liked ...interesting.
"An embryo has no rights. Rights do not pertain to a potential life, only to an actual being.
Abortion is a moral right."
https://courses.aynrand.org/works/of-living-death/
E
How fine to quote Mr. D. H. Lawrence, a man whose book was banned and supported eugenics.
If I had my way, I would build a lethal chamber as big as the Crystal Palace, with a military band playing softly, and a Cinematograph working brightly; then I’d go out in the back streets and main streets and bring them in, all the sick, the halt, and the maimed; I would lead them gently, and they would smile me a weary thanks; and the band would softly bubble out the ‘Hallelujah Chorus’.
Lady Chatterley's Lover
Liberty was for the superior in his view, the others could be disposed.....interesting almost reads like Auschwitz
If I had my way, I would build a lethal chamber as big as the Crystal Palace, with a military band playing softly, and a Cinematograph working brightly; then I’d go out in the back streets and main streets and bring them in, all the sick, the halt, and the maimed; I would lead them gently, and they would smile me a weary thanks; and the band would softly bubble out the ‘Hallelujah Chorus’.
Lady Chatterley's Lover
Liberty was for the superior in his view, the others could be disposed.....interesting almost reads like Auschwitz
-
1
- Show all
The questions before the SCOTUS are quite simple really:
1) Can these rogue states create and/or break any election laws they choose (resulting in massive
election fraud) using any excuse available (the mere inconvenience of COVID)?
2) should the other law abiding States suffer as victims to wanton or irreverant law-breaking?
There are tons contract laws on the books and precident to draw upon.
So what will they do? Let the malefactors continue on their merry way and steal an election?
1) Can these rogue states create and/or break any election laws they choose (resulting in massive
election fraud) using any excuse available (the mere inconvenience of COVID)?
2) should the other law abiding States suffer as victims to wanton or irreverant law-breaking?
There are tons contract laws on the books and precident to draw upon.
So what will they do? Let the malefactors continue on their merry way and steal an election?
-
3
- Show all
IOWA — Governor Kim Reynolds is denying Attorney General Tom Miller’s request to file a brief opposing a lawsuit that seeks to invalidate the general election results in four states...where President Trump and the Republican Party accuse widespread voter fraud occurred. Instead, the Governor says she would have rather Iowa join the lawsuit in support of President Trump and argue to invalidate the votes of millions of Americans that have already lawfully been certified.
https://who13.com/news/governor-rey...o8E-7hb6zwyT4ti-wQqt4tn2RWxVEbSVmnaVdkWHepL50
https://who13.com/news/governor-rey...o8E-7hb6zwyT4ti-wQqt4tn2RWxVEbSVmnaVdkWHepL50
No better time in history than now, to address the question?
Having a majority of (5) solid constitutional Justices, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett to answer the questions
Absolutely the voting times and rules were changed without State Legislature involvement or approval, directly affecting the outcome of the election.
Examples:
1. Extended Reception Time For Ballots, Beyond Nov 3rd 8pm?
2. Curing Votes, Correcting Ballot Names, Addresses, Birth Dates?
3. Signature Verifications?
4. Drop Boxes, Chain Of Custody?
The items above, directly relate to the constitutional law below, Times, Places, Manner?
The Texas Filing Is Solid, All The States In Question, Circumvented The Legislative Process
US Constitution Article 1. Section. 4.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
Having a majority of (5) solid constitutional Justices, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett to answer the questions
Absolutely the voting times and rules were changed without State Legislature involvement or approval, directly affecting the outcome of the election.
Examples:
1. Extended Reception Time For Ballots, Beyond Nov 3rd 8pm?
2. Curing Votes, Correcting Ballot Names, Addresses, Birth Dates?
3. Signature Verifications?
4. Drop Boxes, Chain Of Custody?
The items above, directly relate to the constitutional law below, Times, Places, Manner?
The Texas Filing Is Solid, All The States In Question, Circumvented The Legislative Process
US Constitution Article 1. Section. 4.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
what's your view on state's rights, cv5?
should California be allowed to throw out Texas, Florida, Ohio & North Carolina's election results on some basis that the legislative bodies & courts of Texas, Florida, Ohio & North Carolina have already looked at and dismissed?
is that what the SCOTUS is for? to let one state determine how 26 other states hold their elections, despite what those states themselves have already decided through due process?
should California be allowed to throw out Texas, Florida, Ohio & North Carolina's election results on some basis that the legislative bodies & courts of Texas, Florida, Ohio & North Carolina have already looked at and dismissed?
is that what the SCOTUS is for? to let one state determine how 26 other states hold their elections, despite what those states themselves have already decided through due process?
-
1
- Show all
Your claims are biased and (False)
Due Process Is In The US Supreme Court Presently, Its Not Defined By Your Liberal Bias In False Claims.
The States In Question Violated The US Constitution, That Has A Direct Effect On All States, Concerning The Elected President
Absolutely the voting times and rules were changed without State Legislature involvement or approval, directly affecting the outcome of the election.
Examples:
1. Extended Reception Time For Ballots, Beyond Nov 3rd 8pm?
2. Curing Votes In Correcting Ballots, Names, Addresses, Birth Dates, Signatures?
3. Signature Verification Changes?
4. Voting Drop Boxes, And Chain Of Custody?
The items above, directly relate to the constitutional law below, Times, Places, Manner?
The Texas Filing Is Solid, All The States In Question, Circumvented The Legislative Process In Changing The Election Laws.
US Constitution Article 1. Section. 4.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
Due Process Is In The US Supreme Court Presently, Its Not Defined By Your Liberal Bias In False Claims.
The States In Question Violated The US Constitution, That Has A Direct Effect On All States, Concerning The Elected President
Absolutely the voting times and rules were changed without State Legislature involvement or approval, directly affecting the outcome of the election.
Examples:
1. Extended Reception Time For Ballots, Beyond Nov 3rd 8pm?
2. Curing Votes In Correcting Ballots, Names, Addresses, Birth Dates, Signatures?
3. Signature Verification Changes?
4. Voting Drop Boxes, And Chain Of Custody?
The items above, directly relate to the constitutional law below, Times, Places, Manner?
The Texas Filing Is Solid, All The States In Question, Circumvented The Legislative Process In Changing The Election Laws.
US Constitution Article 1. Section. 4.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroo...ion-reform-bill-including-new-mail-in-voting/
PA's legislature changed their own election laws in 2019 ↑
nobody wanted to sue them until Trump lost. that's why the PA courts threw out the suits about it. that's why the SCOTUS upheld the PA court decisions, refusing to even hear the matter.
PA's legislature changed their own election laws in 2019 ↑
nobody wanted to sue them until Trump lost. that's why the PA courts threw out the suits about it. that's why the SCOTUS upheld the PA court decisions, refusing to even hear the matter.
-
1
- Show all
maybe Texas ought to sue itself, since its own governor unilaterally extended the mail-in voting window back in October.
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/07/texas-early-voting-october-13/
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/07/texas-early-voting-october-13/
-
1
- Show all
maybe Texas ought to sue Florida?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/21/florida-voting-changes-felony-convictions-drop-boxes
but this is clearly not about being fair or even-handed. it's about a loser trying to sue his way into stealing what he lost.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/21/florida-voting-changes-felony-convictions-drop-boxes
but this is clearly not about being fair or even-handed. it's about a loser trying to sue his way into stealing what he lost.
-
1
-
1
-
1
- Show all
why isn't Texas trying to overthrow all the other states - because almost every state in the union ((including Texas)) made changes to their electoral processes in order to make voting more accessible in the middle of a pandemic - instead of *only* a couple that didn't vote R?
why is Texas only trying to overthrow these 4 states rights?
why is Texas only trying to overthrow these 4 states rights?
-
1
- Show all
Pennsylvania had many changes not mentioned in the bill, ballot curing,
Judge Alito Asked Pennsylvania to set aside ballots received after Nov 3rd 8pm, the changing of times was not in the legislation passed in Pennsylvania
Just two mentions of constitutional violations,not passed by the State Legislators
Judge Alito Asked Pennsylvania to set aside ballots received after Nov 3rd 8pm, the changing of times was not in the legislation passed in Pennsylvania
Just two mentions of constitutional violations,not passed by the State Legislators
-
3
-
1
- Show all
To break constitutional law isnt a States right, it's breaking the law
Texas is challenging the four States because of criminal election fraud, violations of constitutional laws are just one aspect, you act as if your unaware of this fraud?
Your fully aware and remain silent, knowing well, the gross criminal fraud that took place in Pennsylvania
Texas is challenging the four States because of criminal election fraud, violations of constitutional laws are just one aspect, you act as if your unaware of this fraud?
Your fully aware and remain silent, knowing well, the gross criminal fraud that took place in Pennsylvania
-
7
- Show all
- Status