Um... that's what the NASB says.I'm not turning a blind eye to context. ...
Besides that, the KJV says that of those who rose from the dead, some of them were raised to eternal life and some were raised to eternal contempt.
Um... that's what the NASB says.I'm not turning a blind eye to context. ...
Besides that, the KJV says that of those who rose from the dead, some of them were raised to eternal life and some were raised to eternal contempt.
It cannot be seen by those who ignore context and repeatedly insertUm... that's what the NASB says.
Prove it.People who only read the KJV are guilty of EXACTLY the same thing.
Dan 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.You have proven it already.![]()
This race.The race was already won.
Many.Dan 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
Who awakes in that verse?
Dan 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.Many.
In the KJV, "many of them that sleep in the dust".Dan 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
Who awakes in that verse?
The point is that many who slept in the dust is the subject of verse 2.In the KJV, "many of them that sleep in the dust".
In the NASB, "many of those who sleep in the dust".
Your point?
Spit it out, man. What is your point? I can read the text just as well as you can, but I can't read your mind.The point is that many who slept in the dust is the subject of verse 2.
The rest of the verse pertains to the subject..... [Subject]many who were raised[/Subject] some or the subject were raised to everlasting life and some to everlasting contempt.Spit it out, man. What is your point? I can read the text just as well as you can, but I can't read your mind.
And there is no other way to do it.We are left with a mountain of physical evidence in the form of manuscripts. Yes, they are copies, but the copies can be compared to determine which is the most likely original wording. That's the science of textual criticism.
Aaaaaaaannnnd?The rest of the verse pertains to the subject..... [Subject]many who were raised[/Subject] some or the subject were raised to everlasting life and some to everlasting contempt.
Some of the subject was raised to eternal life and some of the subject was raised to eternal condemnation. What more can I say, how much more clearer can it be made?Aaaaaaaannnnd?