Could you provide me a link to said post, please?I posted the verses in that post, both the KJV and the NASB, they preach two different resurrections.
Could you provide me a link to said post, please?I posted the verses in that post, both the KJV and the NASB, they preach two different resurrections.
We need to get more out of the bible than just the message of salvation. There's tons of other things that we need to know as Christians.What does that mean?
All bible version are not equal and this is a prime example.Could you provide me a link to said post, please?
We know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.We need to get more out of the bible than just the message of salvation. There's tons of other things that we need to know as Christians.
We need to get more out of the bible than just the message of salvation. There's tons of other things that we need to know as Christians.
They both say many will awake, some to one fate and others to the other fate.All bible version are not equal and this is a prime example.
Daniel 12:2
King James Version
2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
Daniel 12:2
New American Standard Bible
2 And many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting [a]contempt.
In the KJV many that sleep in the ground shall awake. Of those that awake, some of them will be raised to eternal life and some to everlasting contempt.
In the NASB many that sleep in the ground shall awake. And those that awake will be raised to everlasting life but the others who didn't awake, they will be will be raised at ANOTHER TIME to everlasting contempt.
Two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT messages. Which one is right?
The context of that verse is knowledge of the law, not knowledge of God and the kingdom.We know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.
You couldn't have read that post because I clearly pointed out the differences between the two.They both say many will awake, some to one fate and others to the other fate.
If your quibble is that it is awkwardly worded, that is the very same problem many have with the KJV![]()
About food sacrificed to idols?The context of that verse is knowledge of the law, not knowledge of God and the kingdom.
No, your explanation was lacking, due to pointing at something that does not exist.You couldn't have read that post because I clearly pointed out the differences between the two.
It was a jab at the Jews who are puffed up over their knowledge of the law. Like that makes them better than others.About food sacrificed to idols?
Ok do me a favor, in your words tell me what my argument was.No, your explanation was lacking, due to pointing at something that does not exist.
Now about food sacrificed to idols: We know that “We all possess knowledge.” But knowledge puffs up while love builds up.It was a jab at the Jews who are puffed up over their knowledge of the law. Like that makes them better than others.
You are saying the two versions say different things, making one clearly wrong.Ok do me a favor, in your words tell me what my argument was.
In the KJV many that sleep in the ground shall awake. Of those that awake, some of them will be raised to eternal life and some to everlasting contempt.You are saying the two versions say different things, making one clearly wrong.
But they both say many will awake, some to one fate and others to another fate.
As do the other translations mentioned in that post.It's not the standard for measurement, it meets the standard for being God's word.
You also argue that the KJV is the only reliable Scripture translation while admitting at the same time that we do not have originals to authenticate reliability. That is what I have been trying to show you. So it is merely your preference, based on your opinion. That is not a bad thing. It just nullifies any claim to the KJV being somehow superior when there is no way to authenticate adherence to originals.Ok do me a favor, in your words tell me what my argument was.
The NASB says, And many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting contempt. I do not see it saying what you claim it does. PS~ the dead are referred to as dead, even in resurrection.In the KJV many that sleep in the ground shall awake. Of those that awake, some of them will be raised to eternal life and some to everlasting contempt.
In the NASB many that sleep in the ground shall awake. And those that awake will be raised to everlasting life but the others who didn't awake, they will be will be raised at ANOTHER TIME to everlasting contempt.
The NASB has ALL of those who awake being raised to everlasting life.
The KJV has SOME of those awake being raised to everlasting life and SOME of them to everlasting contempt.
That isn't even close to saying the same thing.
The NASB says, And many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting contempt. I do not see it saying what you claim it does.
And many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, theseThe KJV says that some of them that ROSE were raised to eternal life and some of them that ROSE were raised to everlasting contempt.
The NASB says that ALL OF THEM THAT ROSE were raised to eternal life and the rest that DID NOT RISE were left in everlasting contempt.
I really don't understand why you can't see this. These two bibles are preaching two COMLETELY different resurrections.