Who will Win
- Thread starter JJay
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Tucker Carlson Delivers a Monologue So Damning That President Trump Shares It, Includes Explosive Hunter Biden News
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2020/1...amning-that-president-trump-shares-it-n290942
As Carlson quips, now you know exactly why we the mainstream media and social media immediately sought to quash the Hunter Biden story with such force. The Chinese have compromised so many people at the top, including in our media structure, that the story simply couldn’t be allowed to live despite it being true.
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2020/1...amning-that-president-trump-shares-it-n290942
As Carlson quips, now you know exactly why we the mainstream media and social media immediately sought to quash the Hunter Biden story with such force. The Chinese have compromised so many people at the top, including in our media structure, that the story simply couldn’t be allowed to live despite it being true.
-
1
- Show all
NOW WITH AUDIO: Georgia Election Official Ralph Jones, Sr. Announced on Nov. 3rd Afternoon that Counting would Stop at 11 PM — Then Led Team to Count Stashed ‘Suitcase” Ballots
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/now-audio-georgia-election-official-ralph-jones-sr-announced-nov-3
rd-afternoon-counting-stop-11-pm-led-team-count-stashed-suitcase-ballots
Stalin would be proud......
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/now-audio-georgia-election-official-ralph-jones-sr-announced-nov-3
rd-afternoon-counting-stop-11-pm-led-team-count-stashed-suitcase-ballots
Stalin would be proud......
-
1
- Show all
BREAKING: FDA announces 2 deaths of Pfizer vaccine trial participants from "serious adverse events"
In an FDA Briefing Document released on December 8th titled, "Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting December 10, 2020," clinical trial results from the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reveal two study participants died from what were classified as "Serious Adverse Events." On page 41 of the document two vaccine recipients classified as ">55 years of age" died: "[O]ne experienced a cardiac arrest 62 days after vaccination #2 and died 3 days later, and the other died from arteriosclerosis 3 days after vaccination #1."
In an FDA Briefing Document released on December 8th titled, "Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting December 10, 2020," clinical trial results from the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reveal two study participants died from what were classified as "Serious Adverse Events." On page 41 of the document two vaccine recipients classified as ">55 years of age" died: "[O]ne experienced a cardiac arrest 62 days after vaccination #2 and died 3 days later, and the other died from arteriosclerosis 3 days after vaccination #1."
-
1
- Show all
This applies to studying the word of God. We aren't talking about the word of God, we are talking about people who explicitly state what they value and what they don't value. It reminds me of the quote, "When people show you who they are, believe them."
You can go to a previous post I made in response to cv5 where I said I believe he believes what he is saying/reading and that he isn't trying to be deceitful, but he is an example of what many true conservatives and libertarians want no part of. I can disagree with a person's beliefs without needing to condemning their soul to hell or vilify them.
I think people act one way online to someone they disagree with in a way they WOULDN'T act had they been having a disagreement or discussion in person. It's as if discussing online grants people a pass to show disdain and contempt to anyone who disagrees with them. All I strive to do is use people's words against them when they try to make a point I disagree with. They will say one standard for one person, but an entirely new and separate standard for someone else. Making the counterpoint of a double-standard is fruitful communication without needing to personally attack someone.
Another tactic people do is twist the bible and use it to show how someone is wrong in a discussion that isn't even related. Kind of like how you did when you said "leaning on our own understanding". We can all use that line when someone disagrees with us, it doesn't make us holier than thou. Instead, we pervert the inspired word of God as a tool... an instrument to use to get the "one-up" on someone.
You can go to a previous post I made in response to cv5 where I said I believe he believes what he is saying/reading and that he isn't trying to be deceitful, but he is an example of what many true conservatives and libertarians want no part of. I can disagree with a person's beliefs without needing to condemning their soul to hell or vilify them.
I think people act one way online to someone they disagree with in a way they WOULDN'T act had they been having a disagreement or discussion in person. It's as if discussing online grants people a pass to show disdain and contempt to anyone who disagrees with them. All I strive to do is use people's words against them when they try to make a point I disagree with. They will say one standard for one person, but an entirely new and separate standard for someone else. Making the counterpoint of a double-standard is fruitful communication without needing to personally attack someone.
Another tactic people do is twist the bible and use it to show how someone is wrong in a discussion that isn't even related. Kind of like how you did when you said "leaning on our own understanding". We can all use that line when someone disagrees with us, it doesn't make us holier than thou. Instead, we pervert the inspired word of God as a tool... an instrument to use to get the "one-up" on someone.
As per usual. 
Since you are so into pegging people into stereotypes I consider myself a partial preterist you know like that Calvinists/Reformed Church.
Somehow they managed to get that right.
"This generation"
Since you are so into pegging people into stereotypes I consider myself a partial preterist you know like that Calvinists/Reformed Church.
Somehow they managed to get that right.
"This generation"
-
1
- Show all
G
if it becomes personal when someone disagrees with or just flat out doesn't understand your field of study/work ( and 11th this truly IS NOT just about you and your field of work/study: it's to whoever and whatever study/fields) then there is a much deeper underlying issue,
and NO, it's not something science is going to have an answer, study, or fix for. It's rooted much deeper than that and can only be fixed/healed/resolved through the atoning blood of Jesus.
and NO, it's not something science is going to have an answer, study, or fix for. It's rooted much deeper than that and can only be fixed/healed/resolved through the atoning blood of Jesus.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
- Status