So, in that new paragraph, if I have stated “I believe all swans are white” instead, you would have also accused me of bearing false witness and putting words into your mouth?
Is it that hard for you to offer an apology for that wrong accusation?
You said: "
Yep, then naturally, we will disagree there. " and then your so-called irrelevant statement to our discussion followed.
If you said: "
Yep, then naturally, we will disagree there. I believe all swans are white” you would have inferred, and put the words in their mouth, that your counterparty with whom you disagree, are in fact making the statement, which they did not, that they communicated this untruth: "
All swans are not white" as you can only disagree to the opposite of your own statement.
We were talking about the Body of Christ, the restored Kingdom of Israel, into which believing Gentiles are grafted into, under Christ Yeshua, the root of Hebrews 11.
Then you made the statement: "Yep, then naturally, we will disagree there. I believe the Body of Christ has a separate destiny from
the nation Israel after the Tribulation. " To your statement of "I believe the Body of Christ has a separate destiny from
the nation Israel after the Tribulation.", I AGREE FULLY, as
the nation of Israel is NOT
the restored Kingdom-in-coming of Israel, into which believing Gentiles are grafted into, under Christ Yeshua, the Body of Christ. You see how you accustomed wrong words to me, by apparently disagreeing and then stating a true statement to which I cannot disagree? If there are two parties to a discussion, one cannot disagree with the other, if the other agrees with the one - on some arbitrary statement that was never under discussion. By stating a believe that was never discussed (
the nation Israel not being the Body of Christ - to whom I also believe), and with that stating that this statement is not corresponding to your counterparties believes ("we will disagree there"), you are inferring that your counterparty believes that "the Body of Christ has
the same destiny from
the nation Israel after the Tribulation.". This contrary to the fact that your counterparty also believes that "the Body of Christ has
a separate destiny from
the nation Israel after the Tribulation.", and that the Body of Christ has
the same destiny as the same entity as
the restored Kingdom-in-coming of Israel, into which believing Gentiles are grafted into, under Christ Yeshua.
I have nowhere stated that:
the nation Israel = the restored Kingdom-in-coming of Israel, into which believing Gentiles are grafted into, under Christ Yeshua, the Body of Christ
That would have been a gross misrepresentation on my part, yet you hung it around my neck, and after I called you out on it, you keep harassing me for denying your misrepresentation of myself.
This is the truth of
Hebrews 11 to which I agree to is:
the nation Israel <> the restored Kingdom-in-coming of Israel, into which believing Gentiles are grafted into, under Christ Yeshua, the Body of Christ
the Body of Christ = the restored Kingdom-in-coming of Israel, into which believing Gentiles are grafted into, under Christ Yeshua
