Lordship salvation vs. "easy believism"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
I'm sorry but, what you claim to believe? Claim?
I'd like to see you show us that Acts was not church doctrine.

I'm looking to get back into the faith of my youth and it is news to me that Acts has nothing to do with the beliefs of the church.
I think he means ' doctrines ' as Acts is descriptive and ' transitional ' .
 

Infinite_Ark

Active member
Sep 19, 2020
165
71
28
Romans 11. I wonder how many here have read that entire chapter? I thought I had until Guojing referenced it and then I looked again and read the entire chapter.
Romans 11:32 For God has consigned all people to disobedience so that he may show mercy to them all.

What?
That answers my earlier question in another thread. Why didn't God show mercy and forgive Adam and Eve their first mistake? He did not do that because God intended to consign all people to disobedience so that he may show mercy to them all. :oops:
Sound familiar? Exodus 7:3 But I will harden[f] Pharaoh’s heart, and although I will multiply[g] my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt, 4 Pharaoh will not listen to you.[h] I will reach into[i] Egypt and bring out my regiments,[j] my people the Israelites, from the land of Egypt with great acts of judgment. 5 Then[k] the Egyptians will know that I am the Lord when I extend my hand[l] over Egypt and bring the Israelites out from among them.”

Why didn't God soften Pharaoh's heart that he then renounce the pantheon of false deities he and all of Egypt worshiped? Imagine the lives of innocent Egyptians that would have been saved from the ensuing plagues. Newborns would not have been slaughtered by God's angel of death. Countless people would not have starved due to the locusts, the red Nile river from whence they got their food.


God has consigned all people to disobedience so that he may show mercy to them all.

Let that message sink in. It hit me like a ton of bricks.

I was so wrong.
I'm not in a relationship. I'm in a megalomaniacs malignant narcissistic cult! A God who consigned all people to be disobedient and suffer the consequences God assigned, damnation, was in the beginning. Which is why the tree that would guarantee our fall was planted in the middle of the garden of Eden. Because Omniscience knew Eve and Adam would eat of it because God let Satan, whom he conferred with after casting him out of Heaven and even let into Heaven from time to time, all in scripture I don't care to search out for you, to enter Eden and tempt a woman who did not know what good and evil was.
Therefore she wasn't able to actually knowingly choose, free will, to disobey God's order not to eat. She was innocently led, persuaded, by the wisest of God's angels to eat of the fruit God intended to consigned all people to disobedience so that he may show mercy to them all later on when he arrives on earth as Jesus to begin to show them that mercy.
So much for God being Omni-Benevolent, huh?
REALLY?

I'm in the wrong faith. :cry:

This is devastating! o_O

Goodbye.
Bye? :( I just got to this part.
Now I am a little worried. This part. God has consigned all people to disobedience so that he may show mercy to them all.
I found the book at a bible site and read that chapter.
How does that make sense?
God made us disobedient. That's the same as sin? Sinners?
That he may show mercy on sinners? Is that what is being said there?

The point Paul was raising in Romans 11:32 is quite beautiful when you understand it properly, in context of the 2 verses before that

30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:

31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.

We were saved thru Israel's unbelief now.

In the future, the nation Israel will be saved because we are saved thru the past nation Israel unbelief.
That's really doubling my confusion now. Those other two verses you're talking about and that verse 32 are beautiful? We in times past have not believed God but we obtained mercy through Israels unbelief? But isn't that verse 32 telling us the unbelief was something God consigned all people to? Isn't disobedience unbelief?
Now we've obtained mercy because God made all people not believe?
I really don't get this.

Other people are saved because Israel doesn't believe in Jesus? I thought Jesus came to save the whole world and those who believe in him. I didn't know there was a group that were saved because others didn't believe. We take their place ?
Did Jesus say this too? Maybe the Romans chapter is an opinion.Is this found elsewhere in the bible?

Help?
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
inductive reasoning again.
I have zero reason to think that you know what inductive reasoning is, since you just used it incorrectly. To say that my answer employs inductive reasoning means you think people can be holy and blameless before God without being converted. That would be full blown Pelagianism.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
I have zero reason to think that you know what inductive reasoning is, since you just used it incorrectly. To say that my answer employs inductive reasoning means you think people can be holy and blameless before God without being converted. That would be full blown Pelagianism.
Well to be chosen to be saved outside of the death ,burial and resurrection especially in light of the verse you never respond to . Eph 2.11'12 , is full blown not christianity.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
(n)
That's exactly what your doing . Your saying because it says that ' to be holy and blameless ' this can only mean ' we were chosen in him to be converted later .
How can you be holy and blameless without being converted FIRST?
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
I have zero reason to think that you know what inductive reasoning is, since you just used it incorrectly. To say that my answer employs inductive reasoning means you think people can be holy and blameless before God without being converted. That would be full blown Pelagianism.
Your moving the goal posts here . We are talking about how we are saved and its this way as mention in eph 1
13¶In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
Well to be chosen to be saved outside of the death ,burial and resurrection especially in light of the verse you never respond to . Eph 2.11'12 , is full blown not christianity.
By what authority do you claim Foreknowledge of all things, including the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ is not Christian.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
Your moving the goal posts here . We are talking about how we are saved and its this way as mention in eph 1
13¶In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
So how is one chosen to be holy and blameless before they are chosen to be converted, when you cannot be holy and blameless without being converted FIRST?
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
(n)


How can you be holy and blameless without being converted FIRST?
you can't. The same way you can't be ' in him ' either .
Nor who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
To recieve all that was chosen in him ,you have to be in him which only happens here
13¶In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Then we recieve all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
Well to be chosen to be saved outside of the death ,burial and resurrection especially in light of the verse you never respond to . Eph 2.11'12 , is full blown not christianity.
Btw, I responded to Eph 2:11-12 NUMEROUS TIMES. God purposes in eternity and works out and actuates His purposes in time

He purposed to send Christ in eternity. He sent Christ in time, for example.

Foreknowledge and predestination.

Easy.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
By what authority do you claim Foreknowledge of all things, including the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ is not Christian.
This is your stumbling block . ' in the mind of God ' theory.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
Btw, I responded to Eph 2:11-12 NUMEROUS TIMES. God purposes in eternity and works out and actuates His purposes in time

He purposed to send Christ in eternity. He sent Christ in time, for example.

Foreknowledge and predestination.

Easy.
He purposed that all those ( Whosoever ) would get in christ would be blessed with all spiritual blessings ( in Christ Jesus )
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
So how is one chosen to be holy and blameless before they are chosen to be converted, when you cannot be holy and blameless without being converted FIRST?
We realise what was Chosen for all those who would get in Him Would be blessed with . When we read what Paul says in Eph 1 Including being predestined to be glorified. Simple
In light of eph 2.11 -12 this makes perfect sense and is reassuring for those that were not God's elect ( Israel ) . They can know that God purposed for anyone that would get in him would be blessed ect . Paul reveals these mysteries.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
you can't. The same way you can't be ' in him ' either .
Nor who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
To recieve all that was chosen in him ,you have to be in him which only happens here
13¶In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Then we recieve all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
We’ve already gone over the fact that the phrase “ in Him” in Ephesians 1:4 is not talking about our position before the foundation of the world. That was settled, what? Two or three weeks ago?

Let me say this again and hope you comprehend this time.

1. Since Ephesians 1:4 is talking about something that happened before time, it is clear that the phrase “ in Christ” is not talking about our position at that point.

2. Because we didn’t exist yet nor were we saved

3. But Paul uses the phrase “ in Christ” in other ways. For example, Ephesians 3:11

4. Therefore, to say that Ephesians 1:4 never happened because we were not in Christ before the foundation of the world is a fallacious argument.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
He purposed that all those ( Whosoever ) would get in christ would be blessed with all spiritual blessings ( in Christ Jesus )
So He chose a plan, not people. So no foreknowledge, no predestination of us. He foreknew, predestined, called, justified, and glorified a plan?
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
We’ve already gone over the fact that the phrase “ in Him” in Ephesians 1:4 is not talking about our position before the foundation of the world. That was settled, what? Two or three weeks ago?

Let me say this again and hope you comprehend this time.

1. Since Ephesians 1:4 is talking about something that happened before time, it is clear that the phrase “ in Christ” is not talking about our position at that point.

2. Because we didn’t exist yet nor were we saved

3. But Paul uses the phrase “ in Christ” in other ways. For example, Ephesians 3:11

4. Therefore, to say that Ephesians 1:4 never happened because we were not in Christ before the foundation of the world is a fallacious argument.
It did happen. The purpose for all those who would be in him would be predestined to glorification. This being ' in him ' is one of the mysteries revealed to Paul.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
We realise what was Chosen for all those who would get in Him Would be blessed with . When we read what Paul says in Eph 1 Including being predestined to be glorified. Simple
In light of eph 2.11 -12 this makes perfect sense and is reassuring for those that were not God's elect ( Israel ) . They can know that God purposed for anyone that would get in him would be blessed ect . Paul reveals these mysteries.
does Ephesians 1:4 say that God chose a what or does it say He chose a who?