Elect according to the foreknowledge of God. 1 Peter 1:2

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
EleventhHour said:
You can Scofield and Darby while you are at it.
Click to expand...

I have not read much of either. And they’re not even close to being before Augustine, which is who through faith mentioned.

You’re not following the flow of the discussion. He talked about views of the early church before Augustine.

Which isn’t even relevant, because there were all kinds of things in the ECF that you wouldn’t accept, probably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eternally-gratefull
OIC1965 said:
I did not say I choose Calvinism. I said I would choose augustine over Pelagius. I am not on board fully with either one, but Pelagius is the more dangerous view.
Click to expand...
I meant usually thats how folks become a Calvinist, because of the boogeyman palagius. every one who is not a Calvinist is a palagian to a calvinist . Of course both are false. Prior to this debate we didn't have regeneration preceding faith or a gnostic election before people existed. Ariminians have carried this on in also with Jacob Arm being a student of Beza . He still did not fully leave the calvinist hive . Nor have people today. They walk right into it as I did , unwittingly.
 
throughfaith said:
Thats the problem for your theolgy not mine . You've got the being saved before being in Christ philosophy.
Click to expand...
Nope
you just falsely accused me because you have your blinders on
You just proved my point
 
throughfaith said:
I meant usually thats how folks become a Calvinist, because of the boogeyman palagius. every one who is not a Calvinist is a palagian to a calvinist . Of course both are false. Prior to this debate we didn't have regeneration preceding faith or a gnostic election before people existed. Ariminians have carried this on in also with Jacob Arm being a student of Beza . He still did not fully leave the calvinist hive . Nor have people today. They walk right into it as I did , unwittingly.
Click to expand...

Most Christians have no idea who Pelagius, and most do not even adequately understand what Calvinism teaches. Not that I am either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eternally-gratefull
throughfaith said:
So the jews being amazed that the Holy spirit is given to gentiles, in chapter 11 , doesn't matter ??
Click to expand...
You said the gentiles were not in until paul
I proved you wrong
and your trying to make it appear like we are talking about something else
 
  • Like
Reactions: OIC1965
throughfaith said:
Acts 11
15And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.
16THEN !!!! REMEBERED !!!! I !!! the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
17Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?
18¶When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.
Click to expand...
Yep thank you. You proved the gentiles were even before paul

Love it when others prove my point for me
 
  • Like
Reactions: OIC1965
throughfaith said:
Thats the problem for your theolgy not mine . You've got the being saved before being in Christ philosophy.
Click to expand...

That’s ludicrous. I don’t know any theological system that holds that. You need to actually hear what a person says before you critique. That’s a common problem with some here. They respond without trying to understand the other
 
Truth7t7 said:
Dual Covenant theology is also a false doctrine and teaching of man.

There is (One) covenant between God and man, the shed blood upon the cross of Calvary.

The future remnant Jew will be brought into this covenant as all believers, there is no difference between a Jew or Gentile, God is no respector of person.

Once again, dispensationalisms (Dual Covenant Theology) is a false doctrine and teaching.

Dispensationalism falsely teaches the two covenants below.

Covenant: Israel/Jew

Covenant: Church/Saved
Click to expand...
For salvation yes only one covenant
for isreal? No they were given a covenant apart from salvation which gentiles are not a part of and it is still valid. Even though no one will ever be saved eternally because if it
the church did not replace Israel in that covenant
 
  • Like
Reactions: OIC1965
throughfaith said:
Enough . This is an area I'm very familiar with . I believe every Christian would fair well to at least look into the history of Augustine / Calvin / beza / Arminius/ pink / edwards / wesley / Whitfield ect also . They would see what I'm seeing when people use the scriptures the way they do .
Click to expand...
Or better yet. Study the word and stop following men
 
OIC1965 said:
I have not read much of either. And they’re not even close to being before Augustine, which is who through faith mentioned.

You’re not following the flow of the discussion. He talked about views of the early church before Augustine.

Which isn’t even relevant, because there were all kinds of things in the ECF that you wouldn’t accept, probably.
Click to expand...

I am absolutely not following the flow of the discussion that is absolutely true.

I am not fan of the early church fathers, you are absolutely correct there too... sad how quickly the gift of salvation freely given to those who believe in Jesus for it was destroyed by religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OIC1965
OIC1965 said:
That’s ludicrous. I don’t know any theological system that holds that. You need to actually hear what a person says before you critique. That’s a common problem with some here. They respond without trying to understand the other
Click to expand...
He can’t here or see

Sadly he thinks he has it all figured out
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back