I am extremely keen to know as to how you can conclude anything other than that from those verses.
To me, he was describing how some of them were like, before they are saved
I am extremely keen to know as to how you can conclude anything other than that from those verses.
Than God say no and Peter went to see that gentile
I think it means "not inherit". Sinners do not inherit the power to believe
So obviously, they did not understand Matt 28 as telling them to go to all nations immediately right?
I have already mentioned to you about the order, Israel must repent as a nation first, before the gentiles could be reached
Yes that is true, and now they arent like that anymore, they repented.To me, he was describing how some of them were like, before they are saved
So you change the verse.
The verse say not inherit the kingdom of God
You change into
Not inherit the power to believe
The kingdom of God resides within the temporal earthen bodies of death. We are the temple . As a fortress it keeps the enemy out. We inherit the faith of Christ that works in us as armor to defend those who believe .
Yes that is true, and now they arent like that anymore, they repented.
The point is, THEY SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM. What does that mean?
So you believe Israel as nation repent before Peter went to Cornelius?
My brother, till now Israel as a nation not repent yet
If your order correct. No body preach to you and me now. Wait till Israel as a nation repent
That was why Peter was very reluctant to go to Cornelius.
But after the nation rejected their Messiah, the door is open for all gentiles to accept God independent of Jews. I have already told you about Romans 11 in another post. You may read that if you are keen to understand the change.
Of course it is the very same good news of the promised saviour.What good news did Abraham put his faith in, was it about Jesus too?
Loose is an incorrect terminology.So you believe, according to what Paul is saying there, if one don't repent of his sins, one can lose his salvation?
That would make his point in Romans 5:11-19 silly right? Was it really Christ obedience on the cross, or ours, that made us righteous?
Of course it is the very same good news of the promised saviour.
From the very start and Gods promise to Adam about the seed of the woman it has always been righteousness through faith in Gods provision and hope in the promise of our saviour Jesus.
And Peter was wrong wasn't it?
Well, Peter was not told the mysteries God revealed to Paul in Romans 11, so how can he be wrong, given the information he actually had?
If you think London is us capital city and is not, you are wrong
If Peter think god don't want him preach to gentile and God want
He was wrong
Abraham believe God...But which scripture state that Abraham put his faith on Jesus finished work at the cross?
Abraham believe God...
What do you think he believed God for... The seed, that being Christ.
You see the promise was not to his Seeds but to his seed singular that being Christ.
The faith is in the promise.
The term "finished work" i believe is a man made doctrinal term, not biblical.
But the sacrificial son and God providing his own is nothing less then that promise fulfilled.
Abraham knew it full well, having been brought to the edge of giving his own promised son and expecting his resurrection from the dead. Isaac was not the Christ but a bearer of and image of that promise.
If you read Scripture literally in Genesis 15
2 And Abram said, Lord God, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?
3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir.
4 And, behold, the word of the Lord came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir.
5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.
6 And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
Anything about Jesus Christ there, without you anticipating revelation from the apostle Paul?
I do believe that all the ones listed will do the job.Your doctrine is already set so I don't see anything that will change your mind about this.
But so far, those whom I have met that believes one can lose salvation, will not believe that mere envying or getting drunk occasionally will cause one to lose his. Like Jackson, it seems murder is the only sin they focus on, in Paul's passage above.
If you want to use that passage to back your doctrine that one can lose salvation, then please go all the way and believe that there are many more sins, other than murder, that will do that job.