Why is it that some alleged Christians think they're in a political forum or a college debating team? I'm not questioning God, I'm questioning biblical scripture and its seemingly contradictory text. I do it in search for answers, not opposing debates. Christ said, "Ask and ye shall receive, seek and ye shall find." I'm seeking understanding not argument. I hope to find answers, not anger and accusation.
The nearest thing I've noticed so far in answer to this thread is a discussion between "kill" and "murder." If there's an interpretation issue here, then there should be old world interpretations supporting such? Even that doesn't answer the question of why God didn't simply use his own justified powers to eliminate the Philistines and thereby protect his people from a seemingly contradiction of his commandments?
Friend, you have only peaked your head into the rabbit hole, turn back, turn back and stick your head in the sand, like everybody is.
wait for the lord, wait for the lord. With that said, remember you
are in a forum for debates.
I will begin this lamentation with an aspirin and an invocation- Romans 1 18.
The wrath of god is being revealed against the godless. What you are suggesting is this- Righteousness is doing what God says not to do, when God tells you to do it. Genesis 15 6.
Abraham believed the lord, crediting him with righteousness. The problem comes when someone provokes your enemy to do what God tells you not to do- to you, when God tells him to do it... Then, if you did not understand why, if you could not justify your enemy, the hope is, you will blame God.
Down we go, its getting dark. People are jailed for breaking laws not found in the commandments or within your God given logic system, where do not kill REALLY lives. People will prosecute you for doing things they do themselves, not always to help you, but to glorify themselves, and others will stand by and hold their clothes while they do it. If you feel out of the loop, people will tell you to do things or imply they know things you don't, just to watch you make a fool of yourself or much much worse.
Now, we are in utter darkness, their is no light to find the exit, we are hungry, we become enraged, we have cursed God and here in a hole in the ground we find dispair, darkness and gloom. Here, we have been betrayed, here we will be destroyed. The contradiction is born of a blasphemy, a deception- We have attributed to the holy spirit vengeance and violence and, exchanging the truth for a lie served a created thing, rather than the creator. Apparently, this dark place and the heavens also are close enough to this physical realm for the dead to influence men and their societies, 1 Kings 22 22, 1 Samuel 16 14 and they have an intelligence suitable which i have called cunning, to attempt to bring about an end of men before the earth could no longer endure.
To accept what i am suggesting is to swallow yet another biblical contradiction; that all the testament is God inspired but not all God be praised. It is cannon to accept christs sacrifice on the cross as divine inspiration and neglect to address the reason it all had to come to pass- sin. Life in and of and through Christ was God plan,/ Christs' death life and sacrifice; divisiveness of someone else.-
Go forth, fill the earth and subdue it.
Before Abraham was, I am. I have come so they may have life.... //For this is your hour, when darkness reigns, Why then is it written the son of man much suffer at the hands of men?
It is a concern of mine that the prophets and the anointed of the lord jehovah were doing the work of the lord and not the work of God. -
The only one who has been to heaven is the one who came down from heaven, Ye are the children of the devil and you seek to do his work. - My question is, then, how can you reconcile the actions of the spirit of the lord with the actions and intentions of christ and accept the same spiritual workings at the heart of both the lord of the israelites and father of christ? esp. in the context of the law, whereby one says, to fulfill the law, an adulterous woman must be stoned to death, the other saying, i DID fulfill the law.
Jehovah is credited with giving the law to men. In the new testament a posit is made that men cannot achieve this. If you think Paul was the mans man and as pious as a wooden yamaka then know despite being flawless in his execution of the law, christ still found fault in him. Indeed, does it speak to your heart to watch men beat someone to death, according to law? Do you think a man who kills a man is the devils pawn and deserves to be killed? Or do you think a man does not wish to kill a man, but is tempted to do so wrongly. Who then tempted pauls men to kill Stephen?
If you you thought christ was the embodiment of law, in as much as we are all men, made in Gods image all facing the same common problems, then your behavior and the law you abide by will be quite different. In fact if you try to enforce those laws, you will die in your sins. The bible is full of goadings, not contradictions, some of divinity some of righteousness, some are traps and pits and snares . If jehovah was god and christ is gods son, and judeaism is the worship of jehovah, why dont they use the new testament? Now, i will go one step futher and say, ALL this information and the bible is spurious and esoteric. If you arent using it to understand life and humanity and suffering, but to understand god, all the paths therein end in death. Maybe the one who is responsible for putting christ on the cross is the same one who wrote the end of the world and the death of all humans but couple hundred thousand.
Now consider this nightmare, which you see everyday; take as an example the epiphany of christ to paul. Did christ cut him to pieces using the laws of the israelites or did he not unscramble his brain by restoring his morality/logic/fellowship principles so that he could be a walking example of what christ is? For any who serve the testament as paul did produce the fruit he did and deny the christ law in hisself leaving a trail of suffering and bloodshed. Paul was a victim. Paul was oppressed. Christ restored him. So if you had
lived in you sin and
served the god of the living then you would have been put to death, in a sense, but not destroyed. Call Paul a child of the devil if you like, then understand what it was about paul christ destroyed, then walk outside and look around and ask yourself, which of these are the children of the devil who were not created by God? The war is for the souls of men, but for any one of these he will search, and if oppression in manifest in behavior and is observable then those who do not make peace, are not pure in heart, those who betray, those who destroy, are called devil children so they might be, i dunno, ostracized, imprisoned, beaten, killed by men at the behest of someone who sows oppression but if noone can serve two masters, then the destroyer cannot create life. Lots of words here, as surely as sin is present, but shall we do about this?