The BASIC Difference between Arminians and Calvinists

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
Much the same can be said for the Arminian position. So both sides have truths from Scripture: but if the truth from Scripture is then made a doctrinal statement used to interpret other Scriptures, you will be wrong every time!
I do not so much take a middle position between the two, but take the truths that the Bible teaches about both God's part and about man's part.
What do you do with those 'truths' you come up with?
I know what some others would do...call them 'the teachings of men'
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
I think He can say who the elect are because He knows the end and what people will do, but at the same time, He is not forcing anyone...
Perhaps He works in such a way that both His Election, Sovereignty and Predestination remain intact despite man's (free)will, responsibility and rebellion, so that both are fully true.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Perhaps He works in such a way that both His Election, Sovereignty and Predestination remain intact despite man's (free)will, responsibility and rebellion, so that both are fully true.
As God he has every right to do this
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
As God he has every right to do this
And I believe it is very much in the realm of biblical reality. At least that's how I navigate most of those uncertain waters.

Example:
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers were gathered together, against the Lord and against his Anointed’— for truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place.
(Act 4:26-28)
 
L

lenna

Guest
Perhaps He works in such a way that both His Election, Sovereignty and Predestination remain intact despite man's (free)will, responsibility and rebellion, so that both are fully true.

one day we will know for sure :)

perhaps for now
 

AndyMaleh

Well-known member
Jun 26, 2020
863
532
93
44
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
LOL, I'm sure Armenians appreciate that, but not sure if Arminians do.
Jesus Christ would be happy either way, and that's all what matters. Thanks be to God.

Jesus Christ would not be happy with you laughing mockingly at your fellow Christian instead of addressing him with a serious caring demeanor though. It is never right to offend people, and if you do, you oughta apologize right away. That's what pleases God. If it wasn't important to God, I wouldn't be telling you this as I'm not sensitive except to the Lord's will and commandments.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
LOL...

She has answered your questions numerous times. So have I and many others for that matter, yet you choose to see what you want to see. Maybe open your eyes and quit twisting everything others say to you.

I actually stopped responding to you for that main reason. No matter how many scriptures are quoted to you...you continue with the same twisted replies...Continue to say the same thing we saved ourselves over powered God...etc. No matter how many times you were told no one believed that nonsense you continued to use the same lame response and try to put words in others mouth.

So here's a tip for you....Maybe open your eyes and read all the scriptures together and it wont be such a surprise...just saying.
You seem to be following the conversation just as well as your buddies.

No scripture was quoted. Just a statement was made. I asked a precise question about that statement.

No answer was forthcoming.

I even tried to elaborate what exactly I was asking. Still nothing.


Maybe instead of jumping on some imaginary bandwagon you could just answer the original question?
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
They are regenerated before they believe supposedly?
You seem to be following the conversation just as well as your buddies.

No scripture was quoted. Just a statement was made. I asked a precise question about that statement.

No answer was forthcoming.

I even tried to elaborate what exactly I was asking. Still nothing.
Maybe instead of jumping on some imaginary bandwagon you could just answer the original question?
I actually asked this question first... and you replied with more questions. So why would I even offer a real answer when you were baiting me.
Instead of going one some question hunt you could have just answered my initial post which was not even a reply to you, if you had wanted.

And @1ofthem is correct in her response, so far you have not really been able to defend your dogma, it is the same ole standard replies.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
Jesus Christ would be happy either way, and that's all what matters. Thanks be to God.

Jesus Christ would not be happy with you laughing mockingly at your fellow Christian instead of addressing him with a serious caring demeanor though. It is never right to offend people, and if you do, you oughta apologize right away. That's what pleases God. If it wasn't important to God, I wouldn't be telling you this as I'm not sensitive except to the Lord's will and commandments.
"Jesus Christ would be happy either way, and that's all what matters. Thanks be to God."...Let's leave it at that.

Your bit about me mocking is a fabrication of your imagination. What I said was in fun...nothing more, nothing less.
God knows the spirit in how it was intended, you don't. If you are sensitive to his Commandments, then if memory serves me right, how about this...'Thou shalt not bear false witness against your neighbor'. (I hope I am being serious enough).
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You seem to be following the conversation just as well as your buddies.

No scripture was quoted. Just a statement was made. I asked a precise question about that statement.

No answer was forthcoming.

I even tried to elaborate what exactly I was asking. Still nothing.


Maybe instead of jumping on some imaginary bandwagon you could just answer the original question?
Remember this whole business started when someone came in and misrepresented what you believe even after a few people told him he was wrong and ole miss 11 jumped on his bandwagon, which is where her origional question came from. (Something to the affect is your assurance based on your regeneration) when anyone who listens to you knows that your assurance comes fromChrist,
His promises that he will never leave nor forsake you,
His promise of eternal life,
His promise of the seal of the spirit
His promise of Completing the work that he begun
His promise that you will never hunger, thirst, die, you will live forever and be raised on the last day
His promise that as long as he lives you will live also
His promise that you are his child, and as his child you you have an Abba Father, not a spirit of fear
His promise that (I can go on and on and on of the things God promised which gues is the HOPe of which we base out faith in, and our assurance in, it it not in self, because if we relied and placed our assurance in self we KNoW we would fail

they also can not comprehend that when it comes to the gospel the only real difference between you and us is when we had the faith that justifies. and Where it came from, and when we are regenerated.
granted, you have some extreme calvinists that are deep in lordship salvation and ard are Dangerous, In their imposed legalism on Christians, but you Have non calvinists which do this also (again I was under one once, so I know the dangers) but all of the nonsense that you think you must endure to the end thus must live in fear that you never are really saved and all the other nonsense throughfaith tried to slam down your throat as the truth of your gospel has been thoroughly debunked, and she can Not let it go.


Anyway, Considering you had already answered the question numerous times and other stuff, it’s a wonder you answered her at all, but it is understandable you answered her the way you did,, I mean I guess it is ok for her to answer Others that way, I guess it’s not ok for others.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
I actually asked this question first... and you replied with more questions. So why would I even offer a real answer when you were baiting me.
Instead of going one some question hunt you could have just answered my initial post which was not even a reply to you, if you had wanted.

And @1ofthem is correct in her response, so far you have not really been able to defend your dogma, it is the same ole standard replies.
I was baiting you?

Ok.

You guys can't even follow the conversation. How can you possibly know if a "dogma" is being defended or not???
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
I was baiting you?

Ok.

You guys can't even follow the conversation. How can you possibly know if a "dogma" is being defended or not???
My response was not actually to you ...and it was a question.... you could have just answered my question.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
My response was not actually to you ...and it was a question.... you could have just answered my question.
I wanted to understand what you meant by your answer.

Maybe you were right. Highly doubtful... But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
I wanted to understand what you meant by your answer.

Maybe you were right. Highly doubtful... But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Listen maybe you could leave your defensiveness out for a bit... if your dogma is truth why are you defensive.
Well then you should have just asked in a more direct way.
I am not sure what tenets of Calvinism you hold to ... I have read John Calvin and all everything that goes with it .... and a central tenet is that regeneration precedes belief.

So I would think a Calvinite knows they are saved when they have been regenerated?
 

Chester

Senior Member
May 23, 2016
4,314
1,442
113
What do you do with those 'truths' you come up with?
I know what some others would do...call them 'the teachings of men'
What do I do with those truths? Examples . . .

"by grace you are saved through faith" - With this one, I shout hallelujah, I am saved by grace! Praise the Lord!
(Eph 2:8)

"be filled with the Spirit" - (Eph. 5:18) - I endeavor to let the Spirit of god fill me with his presence and then I endeavor to listen to and live by this Spirit (Gal. 5:25)

"put on the whole armor of God . . ." (Eph. 6:11) - I endeavor to enter spiritual warfare protected by the armor of God
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
What do I do with those truths? Examples . . .

"by grace you are saved through faith" - With this one, I shout hallelujah, I am saved by grace! Praise the Lord!
(Eph 2:8)

"be filled with the Spirit" - (Eph. 5:18) - I endeavor to let the Spirit of god fill me with his presence and then I endeavor to listen to and live by this Spirit (Gal. 5:25)

"put on the whole armor of God . . ." (Eph. 6:11) - I endeavor to enter spiritual warfare protected by the armor of God
I was mainly responding to this statement of yours...
"if one takes man's words of a doctrinal position and takes it back to interpret Scripture you will get it wrong every time!"
IOW, whatever your interpretation of a passage, someone else may come along and also call it 'man's words of a doctrinal position'.

For ex, in your 2nd 'truth' above, some will challenge that by saying the Holy Spirit is a Person, not a fluid that fills us, and rather that passage is referring to being filled with His Will...and less of ours. To interpret it as 'being filled with His presence' gets into an unscriptural realm and leads one into a walk of sight/feeling rather than faith.
 

Chester

Senior Member
May 23, 2016
4,314
1,442
113
I was mainly responding to this statement of yours...
"if one takes man's words of a doctrinal position and takes it back to interpret Scripture you will get it wrong every time!"
IOW, whatever your interpretation of a passage, someone else may come along and also call it 'man's words of a doctrinal position'.

For ex, in your 2nd 'truth' above, some will challenge that by saying the Holy Spirit is a Person, not a fluid that fills us, and rather that passage is referring to being filled with His Will...and less of ours. To interpret it as 'being filled with His presence' gets into an unscriptural realm and leads one into a walk of sight/feeling rather than faith.
My point is that however one interprets a passage, that interpretation should not be taken into another passage as the basis for the meaning of that verse.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
My point is that however one interprets a passage, that interpretation should not be taken into another passage as the basis for the meaning of that verse.
Of course, God's Word is the basis of our interpretation. The way it will be 'taken into another passage' is as a litmus test to double check that our interpretation as a whole does not contradict Scripture.
 

Chester

Senior Member
May 23, 2016
4,314
1,442
113
Of course not, God's Word is the basis of our interpretation. The way it will be 'taken into another passage' is as a litmus test to double check that our interpretation as a whole does not contradict Scripture.
I might agree with you here, but I am adamant that the basis of interpretation is what the text says - and not what one perceives the overall doctrine of Scripture to be!
 

Chester

Senior Member
May 23, 2016
4,314
1,442
113
Of course, God's Word is the basis of our interpretation. The way it will be 'taken into another passage' is as a litmus test to double check that our interpretation as a whole does not contradict Scripture.
If you interpret a Scripture correctly based on what the text itself says, it will never contradict other Scripture.