My take on water baptism...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
Of course it's biblical. It's biblical for those who lived before the resurrection of Christ.
ok let me be more more direct there isn't anything that he said from my understanding that isn't biblical for believers today. If it was unbiblical then it would be a sin and work of the flesh so since I was also baptized did I sin or didn't I?
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
wow man, i pity you :(
Thanks, no need for such remarks though. Just discuss how you understand, without judging others.

Progressive revelation is how I interpret scripture. God reveals truth gradually over time. I don't use my current understanding, based on what Paul has revealed to us, and attempt to insert them into Abraham's understanding.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
The command is to begin both preaching the gospel at Jerusalem, and in Samaria, unto wherever they are according to the leading of the Holy Spirit.
So for those of us who claimed we follow the GC, we don't really follow the order that it was stated, unlike the 12.

Do you agree?

Luke 24:44-53
44 Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, 46 and said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, 47 and that repentance for[a] the forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things. 49 And behold, I am sending the promise of my Father upon you. But stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high.”
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
it is about God. Christ is God

there's only one gospel, and it is this: Jah is Salvation
There is only one gospel that saves now, I agree with you (1 Cor 15:1-4)

But it does not follow that God did not announce different good news in the past, to different individuals.
 
Jun 15, 2020
622
79
28
ok let me be more more direct there isn't anything that he said from my understanding that isn't biblical for believers today. If it was unbiblical then it would be a sin and work of the flesh so since I was also baptized did I sin or didn't I?
I don't think getting wet with water is a sin but it is a work of the flesh. It has nothing to do with the fellowship that the Christian has when they walk in Christ.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
No he's saying the same thing I have been saying. Water went out when Christ came in.
If that is what he saying then that is not true, if that was true the apostles wouldn't have done it in acts
There is only one gospel that saves now, I agree with you (1 Cor 15:1-4)

But it does not follow that God did not announce different good news in the past, to different individuals.
That is probably why it is called The good news then
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
That is probably why it is called The good news then
So as I have said, to Abraham that was barren at his current age, being told that he would have descendants as numerous as the stars he can see, is very good news to him.

Would you agree with that?
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
I don't think getting wet with water is a sin but it is a work of the flesh. It has nothing to do with the fellowship that the Christian has when they walk in Christ.
So as I have said, to Abraham that was barren, being told that he would have descendants as numerous as the stars he can see, is very good news to him.

Would you agree with that?
Oh I agree with you, God has given many good news but the good news has the word the in it for a reason
 
Jun 15, 2020
622
79
28
If that is what he saying then that is not true, if that was true the apostles wouldn't have done it in acts
That is probably why it is called The good news then
The Apostles did not water baptize.

Here's some data on Baptism...

The question we must ask, and answer, is why did Jesus command his disciples to stay in Jerusalem? It was to wait for what the Father had promised, i.e., the gift of holy spirit. The disciples had already been baptized in water. If water baptism was all that was important and necessary for salvation, there would have been no need for the disciples to wait in Jerusalem or receive the gift of holy spirit. Sadly, many people reverse what Jesus said here in Acts. They say water baptism is essential for the believer and act as if baptism in holy spirit is not really essential but perhaps “nice to have,” or valuable in many ways. Jesus was teaching quite the opposite. He knew the disciples had already been water baptized. He also knew it would no longer be intrinsically valuable after the Church started on the Day of Pentecost. Thus, he commanded his disciples to stay in Jerusalem and receive baptism in holy spirit “because” John [only] baptized in water, but holy spirit was going to be first poured out in Jerusalem.

“with water.” The Greek is hudōr (#5204 ὕδωρ) in the dative, thus, “with water.” Thus it is clear that the element that people were baptized with was water. However, in the later part of the verse, the specific word “in” (en, #1722 ἐν) is used, emphasizing that the Christian is baptized “in” holy spirit. There is one baptism for the Christian, and it is spirit, not water (cp. Eph. 4:5). John’s baptism was a shadow of what was to come, and even John himself said this (Matt. 3:11; etc.). There is no reason to baptize in water today. Nevertheless, the practice continues, and sadly some even teach that it is necessary for salvation.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Oh I agree with you, God has given many good news but the good news has the word the in it for a reason
Genesis 15:5-6 could not have been clearer

5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.

6 And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.

Nothing is said there about Abraham seeing that Jesus would be one of those descendants and he would be on the cross, and his resurrection would free his descendants from all their sins.

We insert that into Abraham's understanding, because we already understood Galatians 3 and we think "Abraham must have understood it too".
 
S

Scribe

Guest
The Apostles did not water baptize.

Here's some data on Baptism...

The question we must ask, and answer, is why did Jesus command his disciples to stay in Jerusalem? It was to wait for what the Father had promised, i.e., the gift of holy spirit. The disciples had already been baptized in water. If water baptism was all that was important and necessary for salvation, there would have been no need for the disciples to wait in Jerusalem or receive the gift of holy spirit. Sadly, many people reverse what Jesus said here in Acts. They say water baptism is essential for the believer and act as if baptism in holy spirit is not really essential but perhaps “nice to have,” or valuable in many ways. Jesus was teaching quite the opposite. He knew the disciples had already been water baptized. He also knew it would no longer be intrinsically valuable after the Church started on the Day of Pentecost. Thus, he commanded his disciples to stay in Jerusalem and receive baptism in holy spirit “because” John [only] baptized in water, but holy spirit was going to be first poured out in Jerusalem.

“with water.” The Greek is hudōr (#5204 ὕδωρ) in the dative, thus, “with water.” Thus it is clear that the element that people were baptized with was water. However, in the later part of the verse, the specific word “in” (en, #1722 ἐν) is used, emphasizing that the Christian is baptized “in” holy spirit. There is one baptism for the Christian, and it is spirit, not water (cp. Eph. 4:5). John’s baptism was a shadow of what was to come, and even John himself said this (Matt. 3:11; etc.). There is no reason to baptize in water today. Nevertheless, the practice continues, and sadly some even teach that it is necessary for salvation.
I thought you were leaving?
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Since -- in the Bible -- all those who were saved were baptized, it would be fair to say that anyone refusing or objecting to baptism is not saved.

And anyone today who claims that Christian baptism is not a commandment of Christ makes Christ and the apostles liars.

For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days. (Acts 10:46-48)
What if I claim that, because I am not the 12, I won't be sitting on any of the 12 thrones and judging the 12 tribes of Israel?

Am I also making Christ a liar?
 
Aug 1, 2020
33
7
8
I don't understand why people have such an issue with water baptism until Peter came I didn't even know people had such a disdain for it. I mean it's one thing to confront the teaching water baptism saves but Peter just seems to have an actual hatred for it or maybe I am just reading to much into it.
I don't have a disdain for water baptism, and I don't think Peter does either. The think we don't like is people getting water baptized and thinking they are saved. Water does not save anyone. People need to be baptized in holy spirit. The actual baptism is found in Romans 10:9, 10. It's not water, but faith or genuine trust.
 
Aug 1, 2020
33
7
8
Well said!

Those who preach that water baptism doesn't save you but saved people get water baptized confuses the whole issue. The latter implies that if you don't get baptized, it may not be certain that you are saved, which amounts to contradicting the former.

The way you say it has a much clearer implication.
I don't know what a dispensationalist is.

We will never understand the truth of God’s Word if we neglect to rightly divide the subject matter. As far as we are concerned in this Grace administration, what happened to Israel in the Old Testament was written for our learning. If we do not rightly divide to whom it's addressed—the Jew, Gentile, or the Church of God, we will use one truth to contradict another truth, and we will use what is true for one group in contrast to what is also true for another group.

These different administrations are suited to different times because God has spoken everything to its proper time and administration. We will never understand the truth of God’s Word if we read into one administration what God tells us belongs to another administration. If we believe what God said in one administration and carry it into another administration that was on a different principle, we will be taking what is true for one time, and using it to contradict what is also true for another time. When we mix them all together, by jumbling the whole Bible together: Law, Gospel, Grace, Judgment, Glory, Jew, Gentile, and the Church of God, we will be very confused in our understanding of the truth of God’s Word.

What is written directly to the Jews, belongs to and is for the Jews. What is written directly to the Gentiles, belongs to and is for the Gentiles. What is written directly to the Church of God, belongs to and is for the Church of God. What does God mean when He tells us that the visions shown to Isaiah was concerning Judah and Jerusalem? It was not addressed to us or written concerning us, but it was addressed to and concerning Judah and Jerusalem. It would be dishonest for the Church of God to interpret to the Church of God what God said concerns Israel.

The present administration of God is in the time period of the New Testament known as Grace. It deals with the new covenant, and it belongs to the time that is called the administration of the mystery. It's a period in time that was not made known to any one prior to this administration because God kept it a secret since the world began. From this our Grace administration, we learn God’s secret purpose that He had placed in Himself, according to the administration of Grace, which was first revealed to the apostle Paul.

From the eighth chapter of the book of Romans, it's written to those who live in this present Grace administration, “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus” and “that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

From the sixth chapter of the book of Deuteronomy, it was written to those who lived under the Law administration, “it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God, as he hath commanded us.” However, from the third chapter of the book of Romans, it's written to those who live in this present Grace administration, “by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight.” What was written to those who lived under the Law administration is the complete opposite of what is written to us who live under the Grace administration.

We will always be in darkness and confusion regarding the truth of God’s Word if we do not understand the different administrations in the Bible. All hope for our redemption is in Jesus Christ, who was born into this world, died, and in the resurrection he became the head of a new creation. The living resurrected Christ Jesus has become the one great subject that occupies the Word of God that the church belongs to. It's this Christ Jesus that is the key to the divine revelation in the Word of God for this our Grace administration. The contents of the New Testament must be understood in reference to Christ Jesus our Lord because the doctrine and nature of God for this our Grace administration are centered in His Christ.
That is what Dispensationalism is.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
I don't have a disdain for water baptism, and I don't think Peter does either. The think we don't like is people getting water baptized and thinking they are saved. Water does not save anyone. People need to be baptized in holy spirit. The actual baptism is found in Romans 10:9, 10. It's not water, but faith or genuine trust.
And I agree water baptism isn't what saves but the argument between peter and I is whether water baptism is unbiblical and abolished in the testament.

From my point of view water baptism is about giving a testimony of your dedication to Christ it isn't about being saved peter seems to think that this is not so and that it was done away with completely
 
Aug 1, 2020
33
7
8
You have to understand the alternative framework, which is covenant theology.

This is the idea that, after Adam sinned, God dealt with human beings the same throughout time. That means from Abraham to us gentiles, we are all saved thru believing in Jesus's work on the cross.
I agree with your comments, but it really has nothing to do with Dispensation. Old Testament people are/were saved by trusting in the promise of the coming Messiah. Those after the Messiah came, simply trust in his finished work.
 
Aug 1, 2020
33
7
8
And I agree water baptism isn't what saves but the argument between peter and I is whether water baptism is unbiblical and abolished in the testament.

From my point of view water baptism is about giving a testimony of your dedication to Christ it isn't about being saved peter seems to think that this is not so and that it was done away with completely
Well, I think the words of Jesus in Acts 1:5 kind of say it is done with. Water baptism is of a more of a tradition in my thinking. Some of the church today turned it into some kind of requirement, but it is not, while some just say it is symbolic. We are saved by faith alone.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
I agree with your comments, but it really has nothing to do with Dispensation. Old Testament people are/were saved by trusting in the promise of the coming Messiah. Those after the Messiah came, simply trust in his finished work.
For me, I interpret Hebrews 11 as, the OT guys were placed in paradise/Abraham's bosom because they obeyed what God commanded them to do.

God told Noah to build an ark, he built it
God told Abel to offer a better sacrifice, he offered it.

Yes, all of them put their faith in God, no doubt, but they had to DO an action corresponding to that faith. Faith alone apart from works was not an option for them.

Likewise, in the 4 Gospels, and early Acts, Jesus commanded water baptism as a requirement for salvation. If you have faith in Jesus, you also need to be water baptized (Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38).

For us fortunate enough to be born after Paul, here is how we show faith in God, Romans 3:21 and Romans 4:5

But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify.

But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

So we show faith in God by following what he told Paul to tell us. And yes, that also removed the necessity of water baptism for us, in the But now time period that we are in.
 
Aug 1, 2020
33
7
8
Well, this is why I may be leaving this site soon because it appears I can't help the folks here if they think something was accomplished by Jesus dying. Because nothing is achieved by dying. Any stupid fool can die. The power is in the resurrection which is exactly why I teach about an in-depth look at the resurrected Christ Jesus... www.carb-fat.com/stephen.html
I wholeheartedly agree. His death is the sacrifice, his resurrection is God accepting the sacrifice.