Third Day truly has made some really great praise and worship music, haven't they?Oh.
Well, congratulations.
And yes, God has blessed me in ways that confound my intelligence.
Litle makes sense outside of Scripture, though...
^ ^ Another great tune
Third Day truly has made some really great praise and worship music, haven't they?Oh.
Well, congratulations.
What she is really saying is she's still pretty much a Catholic and will never escape that because even in Christ that can't happen.
Wait. Scratch that. She means anyone else she loathes can't escape it, but not her. Different rules for her than for others.
THEY can never escape it, but she has. Lol!!!![]()
Put a sock in itYou should know by now that I do not put any sock in free will... at best, surely it is a misnomer![]()
When you're already in a church inundated with the ideas they seem perfectly "natural" but there's a reason that churches that were still in tune with the original languages of the church never accepted Augustine's take on original sin and his very gnostic view of humanity/creation.I'm not an expert on Augustine. I read his Confessions and I could absolutely tell from those that he was saved.
The ideas he conveyed there didn't seem foreign or "manichean". They seemed like the logical ideas that are born of questioning what is happening during salvation.
And yes, salvation does bring with it some knowledge that only Christ can give. Is this knowledge infallible? Yes. But trying to extrapolate from that can bring fallible things.
Some are granted faith and repentance, some are not. That makes you angry, Romans 9:19-20.The Bible says "mercy" NOY saved so you can save your attribution to me of preaching universalism.
And I made it very clear by stating the invitation is for all ... yet some believe and some do not.
This is the passage used by Calvinists to support their theory of election for damnation (some call it double predestination, but it matters not):If any calvinist can support their views with Scripture stating that some people are created for the sole purpose of hellfire, then I will embrace their views and be a proponent thereof.
Some are granted faith and repentance, some are not. That makes you angry, Romans 9:19-20.
You don't know what you're talking about and rarely ever do which is why I rarely engage you. It's a huge waste of time, all you want to do is mock, ridicule, belittle and give likes to childish posts of blathering rants. Right?
You don't understand scripture at all, or rarely, while perpetually taking it out of context. Why not just stop talking and trying to teach, and spend a lot of time learning, "NOY?"
Now get your next nine hundred posts in. I'll read them and refuse wasting time to correct you for the most part, you cannot receive it. Go for it.![]()
Freudian slip? No. It was providential and you missed it.Put a sock in it
But of course I meant stock
This keyboard's T key has been problematic from the get-go![]()
When you're already in a church inundated with the ideas they seem perfectly "natural" but there's a reason that churches that were still in tune with the original languages of the church never accepted Augustine's take on original sin and his very gnostic view of humanity/creation.
As I stated in the first post you responded to, Calvinism is supported by modern ideas being superimposed over proof texts to such a degree that the historic positions seem to be the strange ones rather than the 5th century invention that was refined in the 16th century.
We would all have been people for damnation, had God not quickened some of us. God did not create anyone for hell. God granted mankind the freedom to choose how he wants to live his life here on earth, and mankind choose damnation.God specifically created some people for damnation? That’s harmonious with Scripture? Please provide the harmoniously supportive Scripture with regards to that.
give likes to childish posts of blathering rants.
People are complaining about getting a thumb down or disagree? AGAIN? That is what is childish, in fact it is petulant and childish.
The even funnier thing? @lenna hasn't been here long, and has given out "disagrees" (those horrendous "Red X's") 3 to 1. Actually MORE than 3 to 1! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And she's complaining?![]()
Hmmm, you're contradicting your own Primitive Baptist "gospel." The quickening you refer to comes when persons are granted faith in the Gospel, and are then subsequently given eternal life, Ephesians 2; John 1:12-13. In your false gospel they are only given temporary deliverance if they believe, not eternal life as per 1 Timothy 1:16.We would all have been people for damnation, had God not quickened some of us. God did not create anyone for hell. God granted mankind the freedom to choose how he wants to live his life here on earth, and mankind choose damnation.
Very much so. Both in how Calvinism is presented/preserved through inundation to the doctrine and secret language and in its views of creation.Gnosticism is also very prevalent in Calvinism.
This is the passage used by Calvinists to support their theory of election for damnation (some call it double predestination, but it matters not):
ROMANS 9: GOD ALREADY KNOWS WHO WILL REPENT AND WHO WILL NOT
15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. [Note: Romans 11: 32 says that God will have mercy on all, which means that none are excluded from His grace]
16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy. [Note: This means that salvation is not by human effort, but purely by the grace and mercy of God]
17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. [Note: the divine judgment of Pharaoh and the Egyptians became known throughout the ancient world]
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. [Note: God hardens hearts only after sinners repeatedly harden their hearts]
19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? [Note: God's foreknowledge
sees in advance those who will repent (honour) and those who will not (dishonour)]
22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
Paul uses this evil Pharaoh who opposed God and Moses as an example of a sinner who hardened his heart over and over again until God hardened his heart and he could not repent.
The narrative shows us that this evil man could have chosen to repent at any time while those plagues came upon Egypt (or even before), since God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek 18:23; 33:11). But every time Pharaoh had the opportunity, he refused to repent, and hardened his heart even more. God endured his lack of repentance with longsuffering (v 22) but eventually he became a "vessel unto dishonour" and "a vessel of wrath fitted to destruction" (eternal Hell).
But Calvinists turn this on its head and claim that just as God had already predestined Pharaoh for Hell, He predestines some sinners for Hell. Indeed the Westminster Confession of Faith says that God does this by an eternal decree, which means that there is no hope for some people,
The above is riddled with so much ignorance and unsubstantiated nonsense it is hilarious that anyone would believe it! Lol!!!Very much so. Both in how Calvinism is presented/preserved through inundation to the doctrine and secret language and in its views of creation.
Though the latter gnosticism is something that has been present and even predominant in the church since Augustine and Calvin just ran with the baton.
It's pretty much why I say the T is the doctrine that Calvinism stands or falls on. And it's the one they least often have to defend because both the Catholic and protestant church are so heavily reliant on Augustine.
secret language
Very much so. Both in how Calvinism is presented/preserved through inundation to the doctrine and secret language and in its views of creation.
Though the latter gnosticism is something that has been present and even predominant in the church since Augustine and Calvin just ran with the baton.
It's pretty much why I say the T is the doctrine that Calvinism stands or falls on. And it's the one they least often have to defend because both the Catholic and protestant church are so heavily reliant on Augustine.
I was thinking more along the lines of theological language such as the "hidden will" and other doctrine that are reserved for later initiates. Though that certainly works too.Oh I know about the secret language ....
"all" does not mean "all" and "world" means "elect" and I am sure there are others.
u wot m8?Its not secret if one rightly divides the parables.. . using the prescription (2 Corinthian 4:18) Only if they, "the Gnostics" ignore .
2 Corinthians 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.
Parables reveal the secrets . Without parables Christ spoke not . Gnosticism simply makes the parable without effect so that men can follow after the temporal seen. Therefore literalizing the unseen gospel understanding. As if the kingdom of God came by observation . Walking by sight after the temporal .God is not served by the corrupted hands of of those dead in their trespasses and sin .
Luke 17:20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them (Gnostics) and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
It as a labor of His love does come by faith the unseen eternal . As sons of God it does not appear to what we will be as the chaste virgin bride the church .
Nope. Just the one in Romans 11:32 where you tried to show I was being deceptive in the use of scripture.