How often should I sacrifice a beast to appease God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
If you wanted to apply an allegorical meaning to the Asses and Lambs I suppose you would calling it an allegory. You really need to google "what is a parable in biblical literature" You are messing up the terminology and not making sense.


No need to google it. The Bible defines the words and phrases . Without parables the poetic tongue of God, Christ spoke not.
 
You acknowledge he was a sacrifice and you acknowledge he was human.

He was the perfect Lamb of God.. A perfect sacrafice and He came into this world in the body of a human.. He was way superior to a normal human like us.. He was and is God manifest in the flesh..
 
As long as you insist on calling Exodus 13:13 a parable, I just can't have a conversation with you. And 2 Cor 4:18 is not a prescription, "prescription" is not even a term used in hermeneutics that I am aware of. (sigh) ... I just can't. :confused:

Garee calls everything in scripture parable. He doesn't really use the word the same way the rest of us do - what he essentially means is that it all represents higher spiritual truth. That these things are types signifying something else. He is very keen on the spiritual sense & meaning of types/shadows/signs being the true reality.
 
So what were Christ's last words?

((nitpicks))

"were" is an incorrect way of speaking about Christ. He lives forever, He is the Word of God, and He isn't done speaking. He isn't past tense; He is the I AM - eternally present.

;)
 
No need to google it. The Bible defines the words and phrases . Without parables the poetic tongue of God, Christ spoke not.

John 16:29 His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb.
:) Mic drop!
 
You acknowledge he was a sacrifice and you acknowledge he was human.
Does the phrase, "human sacrifice" evoke a particular image in your mind? It does in mine, and the image has nothing in common with Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.
 
Does the phrase, "human sacrifice" evoke a particular image in your mind? It does in mine, and the image has nothing in common with Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.

Agree she is using it in a pejorative manner to evoke a response.
 
Not necessarily. Either way Jesus was sacrificed by humans.
Actually, He wasn't. The Romans who killed Him were not doing so as an offering to a god. They were executing a (perceived) criminal. The Jews who handed Him over to be killed considered Him worthy of death for claiming that He is God.

Neither understood God's plan in the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mii and SoulWeaver
Actually, He wasn't. The Romans who killed Him were not doing so as an offering to a god. They were executing a (perceived) criminal. The Jews who handed Him over to be killed considered Him worthy of death for claiming that He is God.

Neither understood God's plan in the process.
And? Still a human sacrifice. Unless Jesus didn't give his life to serve some spiritual purpose?
 
You just admitted a human (Jesus) sacrificed a human (Jesus).

If a mother sacrifices herself in WW2 letting herself be captured so the kids can escape the Nazis, is her sacrifice also human sacrifice? You're being really asinine about this.