A tree is known by its fruit.
You will know a “ true follower “ by their fruit
A tree is known by its fruit.
You’re a follower of calvin’s followers. And believe me, it shows in your bad fruit.You will know a “ true follower “ by their fruit.
I don’t even dignify calvinism or its heretical followers with capitalization.
You’re a follower of calvin’s followers. And believe me, it shows in your bad fruit.
I undo autocorrect with the same enthusiasm that calvinists undo Scripture.well auto correct would beg to differ![]()
Jesus refers to such people as being afraid of the light. And we all know why.
Boring and openly dishonest. But then again, it’s just more of your bad fruit.You can tell a “true follower “ by their fruit.
I don’t follow anyone only the Lord.
Again an assumption....zzzzzz......drinking comes to mind...either spirit or beer.
But you haven’t left it there have you.
Just another antagonising post....that you post to those that don’t agree with you.
You are right, this commentary clearly refutes the idea of "Limited atonement"Here's another good example from Calvin's commentaries. He is himself affirming that God refutes his theology:
John 12:47: And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
CALVIN'S COMMENTARY: SALVATION IS FOR ALL
47. If any man hear my words. After having spoken concerning his grace, and exhorted his disciples to steady faith, he now begins to strike the rebellious, though even here he mitigates the severity due to the wickedness of those who deliberately -- as it were -- reject God; for he delays to pronounce judgment on them, because, on the contrary, he has come for the salvation of all.
In the first place, we ought to understand that he does not speak here of all unbelievers without distinction, but of those who, knowingly and willingly, reject the doctrine of the Gospel which has been exhibited to them. Why then does Christ not choose to condemn them? It is because he lays aside for a time the office of a judge, and offers salvation to all without reserve, and stretches out his arms to embrace all, that all may be the more encouraged to repent.
And yet there is a circumstance of no small moment, by which he points out the aggravation of the crime, if they reject an invitation so kind and gracious, for it is as if he had said, "Lo, I am here to invite all, and, forgetting the character of a judge, I have this as my single object, to persuade all, and to rescue from destruction those who are already twice ruined." No man, therefore, is condemned on account of having despised the Gospel, except he who, disdaining the lovely message of salvation, has chosen of his own accord to draw down destruction on himself.
I undo autocorrect with the same enthusiasm that calvinists undo Scripture.![]()
Read John 3 prayerfully. If you have difficulty understanding then I will explain it.I find this post really interesting.....can you explain it please?
Boring and openly dishonest. But then again, it’s just more of your bad fruit.
Who’s they?You know what they say, if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the Calvinist kitchen![]()
Read John 3 prayerfully. If you have difficulty understanding then I will explain it.
I like to be honest that is all, and you yourself admitted it.
How many times did I reach out to you to give guidance as well as others and typically you responded to that guidance as though it was done in malice.
In my honesty I could not deny that you have indeed given your testimony.
You really should have just said "thank you" ... but you see, you put yourself in a very antagonist place over and over again.
No disrespect..you would be the last person I would ask to explain it to me......nothing to do with my fruit..just being honest.
If I didn’t understand it..I would ask preacher.or Nov 25..in a private pm...