BLM (Black Lives Matter) is a type of Baal worship.
- Thread starter JohnPost1
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think it's important to note that your initial reply to me was to a post where I specifically said "since we're talking about the phrase now and not the movement..."
The important distinction was made at the outset. Was the very first thing written in my post.
I've been speaking on the phrase (and mindset behind it) and not on the movement as soon as issue was taken with the phrase.
Now if I may answer your points.
----
Let's imagine two groups:
- Community A
- Community B
Let's say for both groups there was a 50/50 even split between "upstanding citizens" and "degenerate criminals" living in both communities.
Let's say crime is inversely proportional to the effort of group C, the police force, "protecting & serving" both communities. So the more group C "protects and serves", the less crime there is in either community. Group C keeps the criminal element at bay.
Finally, let's assume that the "upstanding citizens" from both groups want nothing more than to live their lives in peace. They mind their own business and leave policing of crime to group C, expecting to be safe day in and day out.
Problem: crime increases in group B's community.
The "upstanding citizens" in Group B complain that group C isn't "protecting and serving" their community as well as it is for group A and are instead treating EVERYONE in group B the same...like "criminals". And this becomes apparent with immerging instances of group C mistreating "upstanding citizens" of group B.
Meanwhile "upstanding citizens" from group A look at group B as a whole and complain, "what's their issue?? why isn't group B focused on the things killing their people more (like their high crime rate) than on their issues with group C"?
....but group C is the difference-maker to solve for things like the high crime rate in group B's community.
----
The high black-on-black crime statistic is literally the proof, the testimony, the 2nd witness that confirms there's a problem with the police force "protecting & serving" the black community to the measure it does for other communities.
One of the issues I've noticed is that the black community gets treated like they're a single organism or entity more so than other ethnicities...by EVERY other ethnicity (including black people). They're seen as "black first" and then whatever else they are second. So whatever happens with one subset (like the criminal element) reflects on ALL of them equally like a stain. They're not seen as individuals first. They're seen as blacks (and whatever assumptions that identifier holds, until proven otherwise).
So "upstanding citizens" are incorrectly grouped together with "degenerate criminals", and it becomes the citizens responsibility to police crime even though:
- a crime is a crime and should be handled properly by the police
- And a criminal is a criminal.
- And an upstanding citizen is an upstanding citizen and shouldnt be treated like a criminal by the police (until proven otherwise).
...all regardless of skin color or ethnic background.
However, with this specific community, they're "black first" to where a crime becomes a "black-on-black" crime; an issue where it's said "they" are killing "themselves"...and yet I've never heard phrases like this said for asian-on-asian crime or white-on-white crime, which we know happens.
For a crime of murder, with other ethnicities and communities "a murderer killed a victim". But for the black community "a black killed a black...again", becoming a burden for upstanding citizens to bear simply because they're the same skin color. People are conditioned to treat blacks as all the same - as a rule - until an exception is otherwise proven.
If race/ethnicity didn't matter and if we treated all lives equally, would this still be the case? I think not.
This is exactly why, as a comparison, initially brought up how well Jewish people are treated even though their religion can literally be proven to have a foundation in Ba'al worship, and even though they're guilty of literal human rights violations and crimes against international law.
My reply was made here.
I assume the people I speak with here have a measure of intelligence to discern nuance...until otherwise proven.
The important distinction was made at the outset. Was the very first thing written in my post.
I've been speaking on the phrase (and mindset behind it) and not on the movement as soon as issue was taken with the phrase.
Now if I may answer your points.
----
Let's imagine two groups:
- Community A
- Community B
Let's say for both groups there was a 50/50 even split between "upstanding citizens" and "degenerate criminals" living in both communities.
Let's say crime is inversely proportional to the effort of group C, the police force, "protecting & serving" both communities. So the more group C "protects and serves", the less crime there is in either community. Group C keeps the criminal element at bay.
Finally, let's assume that the "upstanding citizens" from both groups want nothing more than to live their lives in peace. They mind their own business and leave policing of crime to group C, expecting to be safe day in and day out.
Problem: crime increases in group B's community.
The "upstanding citizens" in Group B complain that group C isn't "protecting and serving" their community as well as it is for group A and are instead treating EVERYONE in group B the same...like "criminals". And this becomes apparent with immerging instances of group C mistreating "upstanding citizens" of group B.
Meanwhile "upstanding citizens" from group A look at group B as a whole and complain, "what's their issue?? why isn't group B focused on the things killing their people more (like their high crime rate) than on their issues with group C"?
....but group C is the difference-maker to solve for things like the high crime rate in group B's community.
----
The high black-on-black crime statistic is literally the proof, the testimony, the 2nd witness that confirms there's a problem with the police force "protecting & serving" the black community to the measure it does for other communities.
One of the issues I've noticed is that the black community gets treated like they're a single organism or entity more so than other ethnicities...by EVERY other ethnicity (including black people). They're seen as "black first" and then whatever else they are second. So whatever happens with one subset (like the criminal element) reflects on ALL of them equally like a stain. They're not seen as individuals first. They're seen as blacks (and whatever assumptions that identifier holds, until proven otherwise).
So "upstanding citizens" are incorrectly grouped together with "degenerate criminals", and it becomes the citizens responsibility to police crime even though:
- a crime is a crime and should be handled properly by the police
- And a criminal is a criminal.
- And an upstanding citizen is an upstanding citizen and shouldnt be treated like a criminal by the police (until proven otherwise).
...all regardless of skin color or ethnic background.
However, with this specific community, they're "black first" to where a crime becomes a "black-on-black" crime; an issue where it's said "they" are killing "themselves"...and yet I've never heard phrases like this said for asian-on-asian crime or white-on-white crime, which we know happens.
For a crime of murder, with other ethnicities and communities "a murderer killed a victim". But for the black community "a black killed a black...again", becoming a burden for upstanding citizens to bear simply because they're the same skin color. People are conditioned to treat blacks as all the same - as a rule - until an exception is otherwise proven.
If race/ethnicity didn't matter and if we treated all lives equally, would this still be the case? I think not.
This is exactly why, as a comparison, initially brought up how well Jewish people are treated even though their religion can literally be proven to have a foundation in Ba'al worship, and even though they're guilty of literal human rights violations and crimes against international law.
My reply was made here.
I assume the people I speak with here have a measure of intelligence to discern nuance...until otherwise proven.
-
1
- Show all
The civil war was just, and it's outcomes are without comprehension.
To think of slavery's evils is beyond human imagination, and it has applied to every race upon the face of the earth.
African kings and tribal leaders owned, traded, and sold black slaves
The Jews were slaves on many occasions in the bible., Egypt & Babylon.
The Europeans had slaves of various races other than black.
Asian slavery tooooo
Slavery, all races and nations
To think of slavery's evils is beyond human imagination, and it has applied to every race upon the face of the earth.
African kings and tribal leaders owned, traded, and sold black slaves
The Jews were slaves on many occasions in the bible., Egypt & Babylon.
The Europeans had slaves of various races other than black.
Asian slavery tooooo
Slavery, all races and nations
-
1
- Show all
To do all of this it makes sense that they would make all this happen, I even suspect the virus was a kind of cover up. I mean everything went down hill with the start of that virus I wasn't exposed and I have a weaker immune system than normal people maybe God protected me but I also think this virus was blown out the water on purpose to ease people into that state of panick and fear, my own older sister won't let her daughter anywhere near anyone because of how paranoid she has become over this virus and once people are in that kind of mindset then make a chaotic racial issue and people are already struggling to keep their anxiety and fear in check but then that happens and it is no surprise people are acting like five year olds
You are absolutely right blm is not about black people it is to do exactly what it has done and it was easy to do as well, they are setting things up and I would not be surprised if this year is a major stepping stone to the tribulation
You are absolutely right blm is not about black people it is to do exactly what it has done and it was easy to do as well, they are setting things up and I would not be surprised if this year is a major stepping stone to the tribulation
-
1
- Show all
People in this country have been fed propaganda since at least the fifties and maybe earlier than that. People are conditioned to believe Dan Rather and trust government officials because they have the American people’s best interest at heart.
Couple that with at least 12 years of indoctrination in public schools and then you have sheeple. Sheeple are incapable of critical thinking.
Couple that with at least 12 years of indoctrination in public schools and then you have sheeple. Sheeple are incapable of critical thinking.
-
2
-
1
-
1
- Show all
The Commie (Willam Spady) Outcome Based Education was seen in the late 80's, the platform in dumbing down society, and is still in use today, under many different names.
Replacing desired outcomes of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic with conditioned Attitudes, Values, and Behavior.
It appears you are on board, as you use one of the many OBE buzzwords, (Critical Thinking)
Replacing desired outcomes of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic with conditioned Attitudes, Values, and Behavior.
It appears you are on board, as you use one of the many OBE buzzwords, (Critical Thinking)
-
1
- Show all
The Commie (Willam Spady) Outcome Based Education was seen in the late 80's, the platform in dumbing down society, and is still in use today, under many different names.
Replacing desired outcomes of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic with conditioned Attitudes, Values, and Behavior.
It appears you are on board, as you use one of the many OBE buzzwords, (Critical Thinking)
Replacing desired outcomes of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic with conditioned Attitudes, Values, and Behavior.
It appears you are on board, as you use one of the many OBE buzzwords, (Critical Thinking)
And television became a powerful tool for brainwashing. Situational ethics and moral tweaking to produce a product of sheeple.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
It's not just in those cities and states nor just in government, it's in all levels of government in every state and in every party. It's in churches, it's in colleges, media and it's in business. Look at any companies logo and you will find a swastika or a 666 or a circumpunct or 33 in every major corporation. I work for General Electric and our logo is a hidden swastika that most people will never recognize. They advertise their allegiance, the are all Luciferan's.
It doens't matter whether or not Americans want to live in a place of chaos and fear, they're gonna bring it. The chaos and fear is only here temporarily to break and divide this nation and then iron fisted order will be installed. When the elite are done with BLM and LBGTQ etc, you'll see just how much black lives don't matter to the elite... they are using them and their movements to divide and conuquer.
It doens't matter whether or not Americans want to live in a place of chaos and fear, they're gonna bring it. The chaos and fear is only here temporarily to break and divide this nation and then iron fisted order will be installed. When the elite are done with BLM and LBGTQ etc, you'll see just how much black lives don't matter to the elite... they are using them and their movements to divide and conuquer.
Not if you read the history of how the South was ravaged and ravished.
There could have easily been a genuinely just settlement where slave-owners were MORE THAN FAIRLY compensated for the loss of their slaves (without bloodshed) and the emancipated slaves were MORE THAN FAIRLY compensated for their losses. The amount of money that was spent on the war and its aftermath was probably a great deal more that just compensation for all parties concerned (without the loss of goodwill).
There were almost 2 million acres of *Unassigned Lands* in Oklahoma at that time. All former slaves could have been given generous parcels of land within that region, with sufficient cash to make a go of it. This was in Indian Territory so all blacks could have actually had their own independent state within that region. And all racial tensions could have been eliminated at that time (since this would in effect have been reparations, and written into law as reparations). Thus the matter of reparations could not have been brought up at this time.
And the Indians who were already there in Indian Territory should not have been cheated out of their lands either. In fact the federal government should have ensured that no outsiders would encroach of these lands without dire consequences. They could have ringed this area with forts and patrols to maintain peace in this region.
There could have easily been a genuinely just settlement where slave-owners were MORE THAN FAIRLY compensated for the loss of their slaves (without bloodshed) and the emancipated slaves were MORE THAN FAIRLY compensated for their losses. The amount of money that was spent on the war and its aftermath was probably a great deal more that just compensation for all parties concerned (without the loss of goodwill).
There were almost 2 million acres of *Unassigned Lands* in Oklahoma at that time. All former slaves could have been given generous parcels of land within that region, with sufficient cash to make a go of it. This was in Indian Territory so all blacks could have actually had their own independent state within that region. And all racial tensions could have been eliminated at that time (since this would in effect have been reparations, and written into law as reparations). Thus the matter of reparations could not have been brought up at this time.
And the Indians who were already there in Indian Territory should not have been cheated out of their lands either. In fact the federal government should have ensured that no outsiders would encroach of these lands without dire consequences. They could have ringed this area with forts and patrols to maintain peace in this region.
-
1
- Show all
I don't follow the dreams of your Dana Coverston, don't get on his plane and go to the jungle and drink the coolaid.
1978
November 18
Mass suicide at Jonestown
David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images
On November 18, 1978, Peoples Temple founder Jim Jones leads hundreds of his followers in a mass murder-suicide at their agricultural commune in a remote part of the South American nation of Guyana. Many of Jones’ followers willingly ingested a poison-laced punch while others were forced to do so at gunpoint. The final death toll at Jonestown that day was 909; a third of those who perished were children
1978
November 18
Mass suicide at Jonestown
David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images
On November 18, 1978, Peoples Temple founder Jim Jones leads hundreds of his followers in a mass murder-suicide at their agricultural commune in a remote part of the South American nation of Guyana. Many of Jones’ followers willingly ingested a poison-laced punch while others were forced to do so at gunpoint. The final death toll at Jonestown that day was 909; a third of those who perished were children
K
I reallly wish people would stop using Christs name along side Communism. Nothing you just described is anything like Communism.
Christ didn't come to be a world leader, a politican, He had a mission. He came to seek and save the lost. But that does not mean Christians can't or shouldn't be politicians or involved in politics.
Which rich people hated Him? There was one rich young man who couldn't give up his riches. He didn't hate Jesus, he just loved his riches too much.
Have you ever visited anyone in prison? Because I can assure they are full of murderers,rapists, and pedophiles.
You can pray for solutions but at some point you have to look at the truth and make some changes. 70% of black fathers are not in the home. A few black pastors are brave enough to preach on that. A few preach against abortion. At some point you need to take a look inward and see if you aren't part of the problem.
I haven't seen anyone here say that. So I don't know why it's being brought up.
Christ didn't come to be a world leader, a politican, He had a mission. He came to seek and save the lost. But that does not mean Christians can't or shouldn't be politicians or involved in politics.
Which rich people hated Him? There was one rich young man who couldn't give up his riches. He didn't hate Jesus, he just loved his riches too much.
Have you ever visited anyone in prison? Because I can assure they are full of murderers,rapists, and pedophiles.
You can pray for solutions but at some point you have to look at the truth and make some changes. 70% of black fathers are not in the home. A few black pastors are brave enough to preach on that. A few preach against abortion. At some point you need to take a look inward and see if you aren't part of the problem.
I haven't seen anyone here say that. So I don't know why it's being brought up.
-
2
- Show all
Which is why animus toward Civil War statuary makes no sense. Were it not for the war slavery would still likely exist. Which is why animus by the black community toward anything Civil War, makes even less sense. Compound that with the fact blacks vote today for the party that enslaved their ancestors in the yesteryear and beyond, even today, and the whole subject is without reason.
-
1
- Show all
E
The other option proposed by Jefferson was compensating the slave holders financially ... money to do this would have been raised by selling off land.
Given slaves was more or less free labor, now sure if a settlement could have been reached, certainly the Civil War as an economic war in the end and not about freeing the slaves.
Given slaves was more or less free labor, now sure if a settlement could have been reached, certainly the Civil War as an economic war in the end and not about freeing the slaves.
-
1
- Show all