Jesus is the image of the invisible God, the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of His nature, Who is Himself God and has made Him known. Jesus also said, "If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you do know Him and have seen Him." Do you see something wrong with imagining what Jesus may have looked like - or looks like now? We are not to worship such images, to be sureTrying to get rid of all the images of Jesus circulating in the world would likely be a useless endeavor, though.
Keeping God/Jesus in the consciousness of the public through respectful portrayals cannot be a completely bad thingWhat frightens me is when an actor has the audacity to portray the Father or the Son on TV or in a movie.
More than one actually and he plays it great I love himreally? am not scared of actors who protray Jesus.
didnt Morgan Freeman portray God in a movie?
You understand my heartbeat. Honestly, I didn't expect anyone to understand.I hope I can catch your heartbeat - I can tell you have been set free and love your Jesus - but it is difficult to know how to reach others of your race.
It is unfortunate and very, very sad that a lot of what this Bishop says is true: white Europeans and Americans have exploited, killed, and enslaved the blacks of Africa. I nor anyone else should deny or minimize that in any way.
But I think the key is to make a difference between white culture and Christianity: they are two very different things. Sadly over the years (and even up to today) sometimes some of American and European Christendom has followed and amplified the ways and bigotry of white, privileged culture.
But it is not so with true Christianity. There are whites who have sacrificed and given their lives to get the message of the gospel of Jesus Christ to Africa. The church in Africa now is alive and real: probably more so than the church in America!
If this bishop waits till "the crimes of the white man" are rectified, this will not happen. The gospel and the crimes of the white culture are two separate things. The crimes of the white culture are the result of sin coming into the world. The gospel of Jesus was given to rectify the sin problem.
The church in American must be real, must love, must share the message of the cross with all around them. And so must each individual who is part of God's kingdom. Only a life of love lived for God's glory is going to reach the heart of a man like this "bishop".
Marching and protesting and burning and looting to try to rectify the sin problem will only make it worse. The answer is the gospel of Jesus Christ.
I do not think the major issue is Jesus being portrayed as a white man: the issue is if the church is not loving and being real for God's kingdom. Let this bishop find a Christian who really loves and loves from the heart and the color that Jesus is portrayed as will become irrelevant.
Me too, a couple of the classic movies never showed Jesus except from the back which I thought was pretty classy .. I have no pictures of Jesus or any crosses in my house .. I do think crosses look good on a necklessWhat frightens me is when an actor has the audacity to portray the Father or the Son on TV or in a movie.
Honestly I don't care about the image of Jesus, I just care about those that are blinded by Jesus being portrayed as a white man.Jesus is the image of the invisible God, the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of His nature, Who is Himself God and has made Him known. Jesus also said, "If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you do know Him and have seen Him." Do you see something wrong with imagining what Jesus may have looked like - or looks like now? We are not to worship such images, to be sureTrying to get rid of all the images of Jesus circulating in the world would likely be an unsuccessful endeavor, though.
Yes there are white people who sacrificed a lot for the gospel and also did great things, touching the lives of many people. I don't believe in "all white people are racist", or "all black people are thugs"I hope I can catch your heartbeat - I can tell you have been set free and love your Jesus - but it is difficult to know how to reach others of your race.
It is unfortunate and very, very sad that a lot of what this Bishop says is true: white Europeans and Americans have exploited, killed, and enslaved the blacks of Africa. I nor anyone else should deny or minimize that in any way.
But I think the key is to make a difference between white culture and Christianity: they are two very different things. Sadly over the years (and even up to today) sometimes some of American and European Christendom has followed and amplified the ways and bigotry of white, privileged culture.
But it is not so with true Christianity. There are whites who have sacrificed and given their lives to get the message of the gospel of Jesus Christ to Africa. The church in Africa now is alive and real: probably more so than the church in America!
If this bishop waits till "the crimes of the white man" are rectified, this will not happen. The gospel and the crimes of the white culture are two separate things. The crimes of the white culture are the result of sin coming into the world. The gospel of Jesus was given to rectify the sin problem.
The church in American must be real, must love, must share the message of the cross with all around them. And so must each individual who is part of God's kingdom. Only a life of love lived for God's glory is going to reach the heart of a man like this "bishop".
Marching and protesting and burning and looting to try to rectify the sin problem will only make it worse. The answer is the gospel of Jesus Christ.
I do not think the major issue is Jesus being portrayed as a white man: the issue is if the church is not loving and being real for God's kingdom. Let this bishop find a Christian who really loves and loves from the heart and the color that Jesus is portrayed as will become irrelevant.
That's interesting. You know the truth and still rejected the pictures, how much more of an unbeliever or a bitter person.Ha, we had a Mormon at work ''good guy and worker'' handing out blonde haired blue eyed Jesus pictures .. I just chuckled and said ''really, this is what Jesus looks like'' then handed it back to him ..
Also Blonde hari with blue eyes is one of the well known traits of Germans , this of course does not mean everyone who has this is German but Jews in general tend to have darker hair with eye colors that tend to be darker as wellThat's interesting. You know the truth and still rejected the pictures, how much more of an unbeliever or a bitter person.
I would also do the same if I were in your shoes.
Am glad it was not a Christian who did that.
Honestly I don't care about the image of Jesus, I just care about those that are blinded by Jesus being portrayed as a white man.
Your answer had an element of truth but your way of explaining it became a stumbling block for me. I understood you after having read @Chester post.
I agree completely, I think this world is to conernec with appearance in general, I find it ridiculous how looks has such power in this world it makes me grateful I was born not good looking in this world. As far as skin color appearances and anything else about Jesus like I said before who cares? if he was aisan then so be it, if he was mecican who cares if he was black or white who cares as long as people love him for him I don't mind if people see him that way it isn't my place to judgeI would start by listening. When we are too quick to speak we sometimes miss the real issue. Having Jesus represented as white/European was a power play to grant supremacy to the Europeans during conquests. I get the problem. I think instead of arguing we need to reframe things in terms of who he was and to agree that the artists of the time painted and sculpted Jesus to look like themselves. It pandered to their audience. If we are grounded in the truth of Christ and have an honest relationship with him, then we are in a position to share our beliefs if asked. Otherwise listening and empathizing goes a long way.
Your ideas are just as wrong as the bishop who you are criticising. Do we really need another controversial race thread at this time?It's something that can be changed and we can always take it back if it doesn't bring any change.
We experiment on many things and try to see if they will solve a problem. What's stopping us from experimenting on these one ?