I think he is too extreme. It reminds me of a saying in the Talmud which I can loosely paraphrase from memory, something along the lines that one man locks his wife in the house and another allows his wife to roam free, and either option is okay. I may not agree with all of his ideas, but if he wants to protect his daughers by home schooling them, not allowing them to date, and then not sending them to college, I am not going to say that is wrong or sinful.
I don't let my kids, male or female, date before they are old enough to get married. If the are a year or so from a marrying age, that's fine with me. My oldest is a boy, and he just finished high school. I don't want my kids driving off into the night in a car with a member of the opposite sex where anything can happen. I think our dating culture is totally messed up. Dating is done for entertainment, and a lot of people, even Christians, date or have 'boyfriends' or 'girlfriends' for emotional fulfillment without really doing it necessarily to get a husband or wife. This is especially true of young people who date. What is the purpose of going through half a dozen boyfriends or girlfriends from middle school up when marriage isn't even in view? It's a waste of time and a way of hurting yourself emotionally and it opens kids up to temptation.
As far as women needing to be married and dependent, Paul encouraged both men and women to be celibate in I Corinthians 7. The latter part of the chapter may be referring to father's making the ulitmate choice on that, so that's pretty patriarchal. I believe the Biblical norm is somewhat patriarchal. I think fathers should give their daughters away in marriage. The Bible does not give church elders the authority to marry off other people's children without their consent. There is no Biblical evidence for NT elders or bishops or OT elders or priests having authority to decree and declare marriages into existence. Fathers gave their daughters in marriage. Esther's parents died, and a male guardian was involved in her marrying the king. Widows could marry whoever they will, but only in the Lord.
But as far as every woman having to be married, that is not Biblical. Maybe the dad in I Corinthians 7 who let a daughter who chose celibacy to remain celibate would keep her in his household for life if necessary. There are no convents in scripture.
The Proverbs 31 trooper woman bought a field and raised crops. She made articles of clothing and sold them, benefitting her family. We need to take that into consideration either. These are skills we need to teach women. Women do need to be concerned with the home and raising children, even now. Men have a proper role in the home. That does not mean it is forbidden for either to work 'outside the home.' In Biblical times, many people were farmers or were involved in cottage industries or both. This was true up through the industrial revolution.
I am not opposed to women going to college. But if one of my girls, at 18-years-old, met a godly, kind, responsible man of God who wanted to marry her, I might be open to it. I have raised my children, my daughters especially, to know that their father needs to approve of their marriage and give them away.
In the Old Testament, one of the prophecies to Judah going after the captivity was to find wives for their sons and husbands for their daughters. it is assumed to be the parents responsibility. I have suggested the idea to my daughters of finding husbands for them. I also pointed out that I cannot tell if a man is good-looking or not. But mom could help with that. If we had some other parents who were like-minded in the Christian community, it could work, but there has to be some kind of network for this to work. A Chinese Christian asked me yesterday if I knew of anyone who wanted to marry a single Chinese 41-year-old. They knew her mother. So apparently other cultures can use their social network to find a spouse.
This pastor is in the independent Baptist movement, or whatever they call themselves now. I've seen 'Fundamental' thrown in there in recent decades. If I am not mistaken, he is a KJV onlyist. He also made a video expressing his skepticism of the Holocoast because the term means 'burnt offering' and he didn't think mathematically that all those Jews could have been creamated in one particular set of ovens. He's got a video about men peeing standing up verses peeing sitting down. I think he got famous because he refused to let some federal police-type officials search his car. They busted through his driver's side widow, pulled on him, cutting his head against the glass. He posted a video showing his injuries in the early days of YouTube, got lots of views, and his preaching videos have gotten a lot of views since.
There was also a cell phone video fo him running someone out of the church for allegedly speaking ill of him. There was no Matthew 18 process, no opportunity for the guy to 'hear the church' and repent, no presentation of witnesses-- at least not in the video. He drove the guy out.