At this I laughed. It means there are none but you do not want to admit it. No frogs, no fleas, no angel of death, I can go on and on.
Doubtful. In any case, the two witnesses were for that generation who were about to experience the wrath of God for all the blood shed from Abel to Jesus. They were warned.
I seriously doubt you sitting here know what they knew. Seriously doubt that.
I am very familiar with the theology and disagree. But that is what this discussion site is for..exchanging ideas.
Ahhhhmmmm excuse me? Waters turned to blood? Gigantic hail? Forgot about those?
(Rev 16:21) (Ex 92:22-26) the gigantic hail
Everybody knows about the waters turning to blood so I'm not going to bother providing you with scriptural references for that please look for yourself.
Furthermore the Bible is perfectly clear that the Canaanites knew exactly what happened in the Exodus (and that their own judgment was imminent), and the Egyptians knew absolutely that God was judging them as well.
Your assertion that the Two Witnesses of Revelation Chapter 11 were testifying at 70 A.D. is utterly preposterous. Here is a refresher course on the two witnesses if you do not know of them.
"These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the [
b]God of the earth. 5 And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their enemies. And if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this manner. 6 Thesehave power to shut heaven, so that no rain falls in the days of their prophecy; and they have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to strike the earth with all plagues, as often as they desire."
Preterism, ignorance/denial of the Scripture and unbelief go hand-in-hand. Tragically.
It's high time that everyone on this board became a "waiter" instead of a "debater", because quite frankly this debate is over.