I'm more than happy to be shown that I'm wrong
Perhaps you are not wrong, "perhaps you are just misunderstood". Seems like I've seen that one somewhere else. @mailmandan
I'm more than happy to be shown that I'm wrong
1 John 3:6 does not imply that followers of Christ have sinless perfection.
It means that those who follow Christ are compelled to not sin.
The trouble is that you haven't followed the discussion.Make up your mind.
Do not be double minded.
Nobody here is arguing for sinless perfection.
I'm afraid I don't agree with you.The Bible argues this.
Either the Bible is truth, or it is false.
I believe it is truth.
As a result I cannot believe that the Bible, and even the Lord, would tell believers to do something they could not do; or worse, play word games with people.
I am sick of this debate already!
reconciliation with God is only achieved through Christ.
Circles circles circlesWho said it wasn't?
You're right. I'm not willfully rebelling against God..
Circles circles circles
Amen, that's exactly what I'm saying!1. Saved without works as a sinner.
2. Once saved, stop sinning.
Do you understand?
The Bible argues this.
Either the Bible is truth, or it is false.
I believe it is truth.
As a result I cannot believe that the Bible, and even the Lord, would tell believers to do something they could not do; or worse, play word games with people.
I am sick of this debate already!
You are speaking of 'Positional Perfection', are you not?
The problem I see in using Heb 10:26 is taking it out of the 1st century context. it was written specifically to the Hebrew Christians that had witnessed the powers of the apostles in healings, signs and wonders that lasted around 40 years.
The writer compares that generation to the generation that rebelled in the desert:
(Heb 3:9 When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years)
(Heb 6:5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come)
That generation of the 1st century were the only ones that could have returned to the temple sacrificial system and thereby "count the blood of the covenant an unholy thing".
That's why the writer states "there is no more offering for sin" and went into an extensive discussion of the Mosaic sacrificial system.
(Heb 10:29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?)
No one speaks this way.
I have never heard a person say that they "positionally" had something they did not actually have.
Either way, I do not want to destroy anyone.
Just false doctrines.
Unrepented-of intentional sin leads to apostacy leads to hell, yes?
1. Saved without works as a sinner.
2. Once saved, stop sinning.
Do you understand?
Aside: It is inferred that you that the affirmative on the question above ...
apostasy leads to hell ... Agreed ... apostacy is unbelief = hell
Unrepented-of intentional sin leads to apostasy .... not necessarily ... guess I need an example to disprove....
Premise1 : a man divorces his wife to marry another and remains married
Premise2 : The man still has faith/believes
Conclusion: therefore, it is possible to intentionally sin and still be a Christian (non apostate)
If you accept the above argument, then I have proved my point to you; otherwise, all divorced and remarried persons are going to hell.
Else ...you have to give scriptural evidence that "Unrepented-of intentional sin leads to apostacy"
Aside: Your scripture verses cast little light on the question at hand IMO
The Christian's journey is one of striving, not one of arriving. That will only come at the day of our glorification. Until then, we must learn and practice humility and repentance on a daily basis.
I knew the Lord told me to come back to this forum for a very god/good reason. Bless you for feeling inspired to write this thread.2 Peter 2:1
"But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them, bringing swift destruction on themselves".
I would like to contend that the notion that salvation is given to us ONLY in return for believing in Jesus Christ as our Lord and savior is INCOMPLETE.
We ARE asked to believe in Jesus Christ for salvation:
Acts 16:30-31
" "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household" ".
HOWEVER, Jesus repeatedly told people to stop sinning, and we are warned that if we deliberately/knowingly continue in sin following the acceptance of Jesus into our lives, Jesus' sacrifice will NOT cover these sins:
Hebrews 10:26
"Dear friends, if we deliberately continue sinning after we have received knowledge of the truth, there is no longer any sacrifice that will cover these sins".
This of course makes sense.
If we SAY we follow Jesus but continue rebelling against God, then are we REALLY following Jesus?
Matthew 7:21
"Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter".
So then, we must accept Jesus into our lives and believe in him.
AND we must also stop rebelling against God, even after we have accepted Jesus into our lives.
What I have said may be obvious to many, but all the time I hear excuses from Christians to justify their sinning:
"Nobody is perfect" - nobody has said that you are
"God will forgive me" - actually, according to Matt 7:21, if you continue to sin after accepting Jesus, Jesus' sacrifice won't cover your sin (verse above)
"We're human, and humans are fallible" - typical excuse!
"It is impossible not to sin, as we are not perfect" - this article sums it up very well: https://www.gotquestions.org/go-and-sin-no-more.html
Have you heard these kind of excuses too?
Christians have no excuses for deliberately/knowingly sinning:
1 John 1:6
"If, then, we say that we have fellowship with him, yet at the same time live in the darkness, we are lying both in our words and in our actions".
How silly a statement is that? AC was never a Christian. Therefore, your observation is fully in error as pertains to reference to A. Crowley.if you already have salvation there is no need to keep the commandments. you can go out and do whatever you want, rape, murder, drugs, do what you will! its all ok because works has nothing to do with salvation. it worked well for aleister crowley