I agree 100%1 Tim 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.
God hasn't attended the global 21st century metoo feminist convention.
I agree 100%1 Tim 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.
I guess she wore the pants in that family if she was allowed to wear such clothing. In reality such a woman does not exist and it would not be wise for a single man contemplating marriage to allow that proverb to set the bar in regards to the standards for a suitable wife.
The proverb lists quite a few traits that a woman of God should possess. I believe that the woman described is a composite character and not necessarily a single woman processing all of the traits portrayed in that proverb. I have an extremely high regard for my wife as well.If the women didn't exist then why would the writer mention it? But this verse out of the what they call the proverbs 31 women. The ch 31 speaks very highly for the women and some may feel they do not exist. But in many ways I would rank my wife just as high.
=======================================================I guess she wore the pants in that family if she was allowed to wear such clothing. In reality such a woman does not exist and it would not be wise for a single man contemplating marriage to allow that proverb to set the bar in regards to the standards for a suitable wife.
What God has joined together let no man put asunder. I would say that this is true in your marriage. You are right in saying that God joined the both of you together for a purpose and that purpose was to grow together and help each other overcome the obstacles that most married couples face. The verse of 1Cor 1:10 that you provided is most appropriate.=======================================================
Tourist, we only gave you a 'like' because we have a response to your post and didn't know if you would read it without
a way to bring it to your attention...
and so, I say, 'hub' to you,
'my wife, many times in our relationship has been a much better business person that myself in several areas -
and, I was very grateful for it, because where I was lacking, she picked me up and I benefited because
we both prospered./..The simple fact was, is that she was better at buying and selling than I was, etc...
she has certainly, many, many, times, fulfilled this Godly principle in Proverbs 31:16.
we both have our strengths and weaknesses in our marriage, but God has joined us together to grow together
and help each other overcome what ever obstacles occur'...
1COR. 1:10.
Now I beseech you, brethren, by The Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the 'same thing',
and that there be no divisions among you; but that you be perfectly joined together
in 'the same mind and in the same judgment'.
does this come easy??? NO, we have to dedicate our lives to God forever and if He has 'truly-joined' us together,
this becomes a priority, that we have a unified marriage in serving Him with all of our heart-soul-mind'...
You are most welcome.Thank you sweetheart,
for your humility and understanding and love...
![]()
I dont think it said anything about her being single. It just simply to me was quite a comparison to the idea that women once was criticized for working and holding property.The proverb lists quite a few traits that a woman of God should possess. I believe that the woman described is a composite character and not necessarily a single woman processing all of the traits portrayed in that proverb. I have an extremely high regard for my wife as well.
If there were pants in that family she would have made them...out of her own fabric. She didn’t only “make the bed”, she made the bedspread. She got up before dawn to make breakfast for the family and the maidservants. Clearly this was all before social media. You might as well have included in this Proverb, “She rides her unicorn to the beer store, and always remembers the empties. She rotates the tires in yoga pants and opens the pickles with ease. No centipede can escape her high heel and she returns the toilette seat to its proper elevated position.”I guess she wore the pants in that family if she was allowed to wear such clothing. In reality such a woman does not exist and it would not be wise for a single man contemplating marriage to allow that proverb to set the bar in regards to the standards for a suitable wife.
...or winning the lottery.If there were pants in that family she would have made them...out of her own fabric. She didn’t only “make the bed”, she made the bedspread. She got up before dawn to make breakfast for the family and the maidservants. Clearly this was all before social media. You might as well have included in this Proverb, “She rides her unicorn to the beer store, and always remembers the empties. She rotates the tires in yoga pants and opens the pickles with ease. No centipede can escape her high heel and she returns the toilette seat to its proper elevated position.”
I think there’s a better chance of finding Bigfoot.
In some revisions it states that "She rides the unicorn to the beer store with her hair flowing thusly about...". Wait, I think that is actually referring to the Song of Solomon. It's probably meant to be interpreted figuratively though.If there were pants in that family she would have made them...out of her own fabric. She didn’t only “make the bed”, she made the bedspread. She got up before dawn to make breakfast for the family and the maidservants. Clearly this was all before social media. You might as well have included in this Proverb, “She rides her unicorn to the beer store, and always remembers the empties. She rotates the tires in yoga pants and opens the pickles with ease. No centipede can escape her high heel and she returns the toilette seat to its proper elevated position.”
I think there’s a better chance of finding Bigfoot.
When I was wrote about riding the unicorn I wondered who is going to put a twist on this? Thanks for satisfying that curiosity.In some revisions it states that "She rides the unicorn to the beer store with her hair flowing thusly about...". Wait, I think that is actually referring to the Song of Solomon. It's probably meant to be interpreted figuratively though.
Of course the same question applies to men fulfilling the role that God intends for them. However, since this thread is about women - relative to men - his point is well made and is not sexist.It's the same question for Christian men. Your comment reveals your sexism.
Of course the same question applies to men fulfilling the role that God intends for them. However, since this thread is about women - relative to men - his point is well made and is not sexist.
He is putting to the point that Christian women should want to fulfill the role that God intends for them - regardless of how it aligns with worldly ideas about 'equality'.
And, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. It is Biblical.
If he denies the counterpart to the proposition, then - that is different!
Because, that would not be Biblical.
But, contrary to what some would like to believe, making either proposition without the other is still valid.
And, the two don't always have to be stated together so as to bow down and worship political correctness.
The very first thing a modern society would have to do is - to define it, to look at it, to deal with it - in the same exact way the Bible does.Scripture speaks to any generation. Modern simply changes the time period. So again through a Biblical worldview how would a modern society need to change within the topic of women's equality.
Is it good, need change, completely bad, or something else. Explain how, why, and what would you do to change it if need be.
So what would need to change in society once you have defined, examined, and decided something had to change?The very first thing a modern society would have to do is - to define it, to look at it, to deal with it - in the same exact way the Bible does.
That is the Biblical worldview.
I agree those are signs of emotional abuse. I looked it up before from a legal standpoint. If my wife didn’t like what I was saying she would call it emotional abuse. I did some research to (in)validate her claim. What I found stated basically what I am reporting. Just because she didn’t like what I was saying isn’t abuse, even if it caused her emotional pain.
If I said anything to intentionally cause pain because I was upset with her that is abuse.
Blame as you listed is a sign. If my wife runs up the credit cards on ridiculous unnecessary purchases and it causes economic stress, I can tell her it’s her fault. Is that abuse? If she feels guilty because of it (listed), is that abuse?
If I yell at her because she tries to argue it’s not her fault (listed),
then I take her off the credit account (withhold) and “control” the finances is that abuse?
The point is that because of this list my wife may “feel” abused. It’s all just words anyways. Abuse has become some buzzword people throw around.
If a husband becomes frustrated and takes out his anger at/on his wife - would you use the word 'abuse' in that scenario?I think abusive is not the right word, but she may become frustrated and may take out her anger at him.
Old single men might like that.It would be rather humorous if she turned tables on him and used the same standard: "If you ain't an elder at the gate, you ain't good enough fo' me!"
If the women didn't exist then why would the writer mention it? But this verse out of the what they call the proverbs 31 women. The ch 31 speaks very highly for the women and some may feel they do not exist. But in many ways I would rank my wife just as high.