Let's think about this. I post to a passage of scripture and you want to call me out over it?
You took the passage about the blind leading the blind out of context to create a pretext. You then endeavored to create a scenario in which you could justify said pretext. Scripture forces you back to reexamine the context of the passage.
Since you have concluded all are born by natural birth unsaved and blind. While true, God does not expect us to continue in that state. The entrance of Gods word is light. The nation of Israel was elect to take the word of God to all the heathen nations round about them.
The remarks Jesus made regarding the blind leading the blind was aimed to the religious leaders of the day not leading the laity into the light of Gods word but away from it. The same today with folks who are religious and not willing to teach the truth.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
You took the passage about the blind leading the blind out of context to create a pretext. You then endeavored to create a scenario in which you could justify said pretext. Scripture forces you back to reexamine the context of the passage.
Since you have concluded all are born by natural birth unsaved and blind. While true, God does not expect us to continue in that state. The entrance of Gods word is light. The nation of Israel was elect to take the word of God to all the heathen nations round about them.
The remarks Jesus made regarding the blind leading the blind was aimed to the religious leaders of the day not leading the laity into the light of Gods word but away from it. The same today with folks who are religious and not willing to teach the truth.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Please forgive me as I present it in detail (so you can confirm/deny that I am understanding you correctly)"
The portion in bold both references the question I'd asked about my perception of our starting point. The bold & underlined portion acknowledges that you agree I was correct in my starting position. The underlined only portion presents an argument for getting out of the starting position we were given at birth. (I think we are in agreement up to this point.) And your posting of Romans 10:14-15 (summarized) is effectively thanking God for providing those who help us out of our original state. Is that correct or at least close enough to what you were saying?
It may seem tedious that I go into such detail but my goal is to see EXACTLY where a disagreement or difference in understanding begins to occur.
And I will answer the other questions of your post more generally in my next post.
Love in Jesus,
Kelby