God designed a la . It did not control Adam steps he died in the twinkling of the eye .
Yes he does not direct the steps of the wicked they stumble over their own design as a law unto their own self, walking in darkness.
Is God Good?
- Thread starter JohnR7
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
God designed a la . It did not control Adam steps he died in the twinkling of the eye .
Yes he does not direct the steps of the wicked they stumble over their own design as a law unto their own self, walking in darkness.
I disagree. Why ask a question you have no intention to read the answer to? I’m done. Good luck.
Why? If we do good works, it was God’s will. If we didn’t do good works, it was God’s will.
“PAUL, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God’s elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness;” Titus 1:1 (KJV 1900)
“This letter is from Paul, a slave of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ. I have been sent to proclaim faith to those God has chosen and to teach them to know the truth that shows them how to live godly lives.” Titus 1:1 (NLT)
It remains, if God is good he could have stopped him from sinning being all-powerful. But instead, he led Adam into temptation knowing he would sin. Yet we know God is both good and all-powerful having done so.
You are either Arminian, Calvinist, or Socinian. That divides down into Amillennial, Millennial, Pre-millennial, or Dispensational. Or fringe.
“And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.” 1 Peter 2:8 (KJV 1900)
Interesting enough, I am just a seeker of truth. So much so I just looked up all of these terms to familiarize myself with them. I probably spent half an hour to see if any of these labels were accurate for me. In conclusion I will say it must be a joke. Good one. Now me. You are either a man or a woman or somewhere in between. Your view is that you are right or at least part, or right enough not to care what others think.
As you learn about these groups, you will recognize the ones that think like you. I can see them by your views on different things and know where you're headed. A simple test will reveal all.
No one group encapsulates my views. I assume that’s the same as you. Just because while reading the same text, I drew the same conclusions on some issues doesn’t make me a Calvinist. All I can agree on with all of those groups is that I’m protestant. I have sought other religions, ancient writings, other denominations and then read the Bible cover to cover without presupposition. Often I broke down verse by verse using Strongs words translator. I fasted and prayed and meditated for countless hours while allowing the Holy Spirit to fill my mind. “Hungry” is the name I chose because it best defines the insatiable desire for truth and knowledge. The Bible is so simple to understand. People complicate it with their exaggerated explanations in an effort to sound more intelligent. It wasn’t written for scholars. It was written for seekers.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
So that leaves what you are, which is? Let us know so we can lookup these beliefs and decide for ourselves. I bet you won't.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
Clark was a Calvinist so why add that? Though no Calvinist here ever said God killed His Son.
I agree with the historic creeds of the church. You do not agree with historic Christianity in places you disagree with me. Most only go back a hundred years or so and are considered heretics by the early church.
Neither of those references say that letter of the law death was no longer needed to convict the heart of men as to their need of a savior.
The old covenant that was set up when leaving Egypt. They failed as a nation to keep it . So then he gave it over to the whole world all the nations as a kingdom of priest . Satan could no longer deceive all nations according the flesh of one nation in that way ever again. He fell from that previous place.
It was not covenant of the law the letter death. It will be cast into the judgement fire along with the hell the consequence of violating it. Not one Jot or tittle will be removed under the sun .It is the last thing destroyed the second death .