The gap IS Christianity.I'm just saying, this is how the gap destroys Christianity and establishes Judaism.
The gap IS Christianity.I'm just saying, this is how the gap destroys Christianity and establishes Judaism.
It ignores Christianity. It turns Jesus into Antichrist and picks up far in the future with Judaism.The gap IS Christianity.
Repeating your beliefs does not make them true.It ignores Christianity. It turns Jesus into Antichrist and picks up far in the future with Judaism.
The prince is the subject supported by the grammar. Two princes are a topic change not supported. Plus the LXX proves this.
Please note that "everlasting righteousness" was not brought in in 70AD, nor did 70AD "make an end of sins".No it does not, this is an arbitrary "theological" invention of Amillies. Stephen's death has nothing to do with the 70 weeks.
The 70 weeks ended with the "determination" on the city it's destruction in 70 AD at the hands of the Roman Armies:
(Dan 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy)
It doesn't say 70 weeks are determined on Stephen.
This is a lie. Please stop with this nonsense.I'm just saying, this is how the gap destroys Christianity and establishes Judaism.
If you stop turning Jesus into the antichrist. And realize Jesus is the topic of the entire segment. And count back from there, Daniel pans out as he said it would. Why would the Magi look for Jesus the eternal Messiah if the 70th week pertained to Antichrist thousands of years in the future?Did you see me mention any princes in my post? If you want to bring in that then quote the verses and give your take on them instead of building straw man arguments on things I never brought up.
70 weeks are determined on thy city. This is what Daniel stated, you ignore that and impose Stephen into Daniel prophecy. This is a sign of eisegesis.
How else can you take it if you say Jesus is Antichrist?Repeating your beliefs does not make them true.
Please note that "everlasting righteousness" was not brought in in 70AD, nor did 70AD "make an end of sins".
The entire 70th week is future, perhaps to start soon.
If you stop turning Jesus into the antichrist. And realize Jesus is the topic of the entire segment. And count back from there, Daniel pans out as he said it would. Why would the Magi look for Jesus the eternal Messiah if the 70th week pertained to Antichrist thousands of years in the future?
Jesus didn't make an end of sins on the cross? He did not bring in eternal righteousness on the cross? Or cause the animal sacrifices to end with the sacrifice of himself?Christ brought in everlasting everlasting righteousness at the cross, this is part of the 70th week, He also anointed the most Holy:
(Heb 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us)
"eternal redemption" - everlasting righteousness.
Yes, he made and "end of sins", you are thinking that there would be no more sin on earth, this is a misunderstanding and would place the "end of sins" thousands of years past the destruction of the city ("determined upon") and the anointing of the most holy.
The "ending of sin" is a covenant position, where in the past there was a covenant remembering of sins, in Christ there is no longer a "remembering":
(Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.)
(Heb 10:17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.)
Jesus didn't make an end of sins on the cross? He did not bring in eternal righteousness on the cross? Or cause the animal sacrifices to end with the sacrifice of himself?
This is not a false accusation. Jesus confirmed the Covenant. He didn't make a new one. And he put an end to the animal sacrifices with the sacrifice of himself.Listen up, quit making false accusations and deal with the text.
Any scripture to support your insults?Are you completely dense?
This is not a false accusation. Jesus confirmed the Covenant. He didn't make a new one. And he put an end to the animal sacrifices with the sacrifice of himself.
Jesus' baptism was not the onset of the 70th week.
Since you start with a falsehood, everything else you suggest is false.
Any scripture to support your insults?
So you too are claiming Jesus is the Antichrist of the future?Dan 9:
“Know therefore and understand,
That from the going forth of the command
To restore and build Jerusalem
Until Messiah the Prince,
There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
The [h]street shall be built again, and the [i]wall,
Even in troublesome times.
This was fulfilled when Jesus triumphantly entered Jerusalem. Just like the prophet aid, Riding on a donkey which ended the 69th week of Daniel
Zechariah 9:9
[ The Coming King ] “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your King is coming to you; He is just and having salvation, Lowly and riding on a donkey, A colt, the foal of a donkey.
26 “And after the sixty-two weeks
Messiah shall [j]be cut off, but not for Himself;
fulfilled less than 7 days later. when Jesus was tried, Convicted and hng on a cross (cut of from hie people. but not for himself. but for all mankind)
And the people of the prince who is to come
Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.
Fulfilled in 70 AD, almost 4 decades later. When the armis of Titus raised the city and destroyed the temple. Leaving not one stone unturned as Jesus prophesied in Matt 24.
The end of it shall be with a flood,
And till the end of the war desolations are determined.
Still applicable today, As jesus said in Matt 24, there will be warns and rumors of wars. Nation will rise against nation, ad kingdom against kingdom but the end is not yet. the fact is Jerusalem and the temple Daniel prayed for still lies desolate. And will be until a time God has determined.
27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
A future event, And the begining of the 70th week. Where a future priince will make some sort of covenant with many (supposedly many nations, one of which happens to be Israel)
But in the middle of the week
He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
again, Spoken of By Jesus, WHo tells the people and us that in the middle of this one week covenant made with many, The prince will enter the Holy of Holys, and put an end to offering and sacrifice, by placing an idol of some type into it. rendering the holy place ceremonially unclean and put an end to offering. As jesus said, When you see this (it will be seen by many, not just those in the temple itself. but many, Most likely this is an event that will be broadcast on tv, for all to see.
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.”
The desolate. The people to whome the wrath of God will be poured out. for a time which will be determined. Jesus called it the great tribulation. Which will be so severe. If he did not return himself to put an end to it. No flesh would survive, But for the sake of the elect. he will come.
At this time, the 70 weeks are fulfilled. Israel will have repented. And recieved the true messiah as her savior (first and formost for her sins)
Its all here. No matter what a church in the 400's BC said.
I provide the scripture and do not insult people.You are the one making false accusations of accusing posters of claiming "Jesus is the antichrist", Judaism and Pharisee doctrine.
Ever read where its is written about bearing false witness.