While you may see it as basing your belief on the Bible, it's extending things(your logical analysis) onto the text that aren't there. The Bible doesn't say Peter was there, but neither does it deny it so the tradition is possibly true. Rome certainly wasn't the center of Christianity until a few hundred years after the fact and is not the center now, but that's a separate issue from whether Peter was or wasn't there. The major error the Catholics make is claiming that a man was given all of the authority to dictate authoritative church doctrine and that claim is unsupportable both Biblically and historically. Peter, great apostle that he was, is demonstrably in error in Acts proving that there is no infallible source of doctrine besides the Holy Spirit. That said, it seems to me whether Peter was in Rome really only matters to someone trying to establish the papacy on that basis, which as I've said we can look through church history and see that the argument came from Leo 1 and was extended by Gregory VI and VII. The papacy is absolutely a false doctrine on multipl
And you believe Peter was a pastor in Rome since AD 32 when the Bible never mention Peter there not even a verse.
But logically speaking, if Peter was the president of the apostle, and was in Rome why the book of act that tell about Paul, his cabinet member there and not mention the boss at all?
To me it is impossible if the president and founder of the church of room there and the book of act wrote something that give an impression look like Paul is the founder of the Church of Rome.
But if you believe the author proven lie do many time, I only can pray hope Holy Spirit open your yes
And you believe Peter was a pastor in Rome since AD 32 when the Bible never mention Peter there not even a verse.
But logically speaking, if Peter was the president of the apostle, and was in Rome why the book of act that tell about Paul, his cabinet member there and not mention the boss at all?
To me it is impossible if the president and founder of the church of room there and the book of act wrote something that give an impression look like Paul is the founder of the Church of Rome.
But if you believe the author proven lie do many time, I only can pray hope Holy Spirit open your yes