I really don’t like getting caught up in the discussion about whether the virus is a little threat a medium threat or a gigantic threat. It is an irrelevant point for me.
The moment you go down that quagmire the most vital point is missing. I believe our Canadian, and European friends do not understand just how sacred many Americans view freedom and our Constitution.
Well known patriotic axioms like “Give me liberty or give me death” is strange to their ears.
So if we agree that one death nationally would never constitute the destruction of our freedom, economy, and sanity, what IS the number of deaths that would constitute losing those things?
And if we agree on an arbitrary number, say 200,000 for sake of argument, why wouldn’t that be enumerated in our Constitution, or at the least a submission of such an amendment?Otherwise we are governed like every other nation in history. By the whims of men and their “experts”.
The moment you go down that quagmire the most vital point is missing. I believe our Canadian, and European friends do not understand just how sacred many Americans view freedom and our Constitution.
Well known patriotic axioms like “Give me liberty or give me death” is strange to their ears.
So if we agree that one death nationally would never constitute the destruction of our freedom, economy, and sanity, what IS the number of deaths that would constitute losing those things?
And if we agree on an arbitrary number, say 200,000 for sake of argument, why wouldn’t that be enumerated in our Constitution, or at the least a submission of such an amendment?Otherwise we are governed like every other nation in history. By the whims of men and their “experts”.
- 1
- Show all