Prophecy Teachers

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#41
The body of Christ the Church existed ever since two or more joined in worship. Church = Congregation = assembly.
Is that your definition of Church? Jesus said He 'will' build His Church, and yet you say it has been going on for millennia before Jesus made that statement. Your logic is beyond me.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
#42
Its important not to confuse "Literal" and "Literalistic". I think you're assuming I mean the latter, but that's not the case here.

To take Scripture Literally means according to the author's intention, recognizing the Literary genre, and not imposing another meaning unless the Word tells us it is using a figure of speech
unless the Word tells us it is using a figure of speech
Can you elaborate here?
 

Diakonos

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2019
1,381
434
83
31
Anacortes, WA
#43
Of course, a great example is Galatians 4:24
In his defense of justification by faith, Paul uses an Old Testament story from the life of Abraham to review what he had already declared about contrasts between the Mosaic Law and grace:

21 Tell me, you who want to be under law, do you not listen to the law?
22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one by the free woman.
23 But the son by the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and the son by the free woman through the promise.
24 This is allegorically speaking, for these women are two covenants: one proceeding from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves; she is Hagar.
25 Now this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children.
26 But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother.
27 For it is written,
“REJOICE, BARREN WOMAN WHO DOES NOT BEAR;
BREAK FORTH AND SHOUT, YOU WHO ARE NOT IN LABOR;
FOR MORE NUMEROUS ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE DESOLATE
THAN OF THE ONE WHO HAS A HUSBAND.”
28 And you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise.
29 But as at that time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now also.
30 But what does the Scripture say?
“CAST OUT THE BONDWOMAN AND HER SON,
FOR THE SON OF THE BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE AN HEIR WITH THE SON OF THE FREE WOMAN.”
31 So then, brethren, we are not children of a bondwoman, but of the free woman.
-Galatians 4:21-31

Did you catch it? Verse 24 tells us he is using a figure of speech. "This is allegorically speaking".
The reason he goes out of his way to mention this is because allegory is not the default of communication.

In order to emphasize the contrast between Law and grace Paul used the historical events above as an allegory. He treated those two mothers figuratively (ἀλληγορούμενα; allēgoroumena). He did not in any sense deny the literal meaning of the story of Abraham, but he declared that that story, especially the matters relating to the conception of the two sons, had an additional meaning. Thus he compared the narrative to the conflict between Judaism and Christianity.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#44
Is that your definition of Church? Jesus said He 'will' build His Church, and yet you say it has been going on for millennia before Jesus made that statement. Your logic is beyond me.
It's the same church, now being built on faith alone.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#46
Thanks for your opinion, I just happen not to agree obviously.
If you are a Dispensationalist, you can not afford to agree. It blows the two people's scheme completely away.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#47
Went through a Sunday School class last year on Daniel. Found it very interesting.

I'm looking to learn more about the Bible's prophecies.

Given this - what 5 to 7 teachers would you recommend - that is reading their materials or watching their videos.

Also - who would you avoid at all costs and why?

Looking to get a good jump - have googled only to find all kinds of stuff.

Also - anyone have any good seminars they would recommend?

Thanks
What is meant by Prophecy Teachers ?
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#48
An Allegorical interpretation of Scripture puts the authority in the hand of the interpreter. They can make it mean whatever they want.
A Literal interpretation of Scripture leaves the authority in the hand of Scripture.....where it belongs. The word says what it means and means what it says.
The Bible tells us when it is speaking symbolically. Its just tough to understand without a healthy dose of Israelology. And if you neglect the Old Testament, you definitely won't interpret the New Testament consistently.
"The Law of the Lord is perfect, restoring the soul" (Psalm 19:7)

Yes prophecy as scripture in the hand of the interpreter, our father not seen, God .

The literal historical interpretation in in the hands of men seen . The Greater witness is that of God not seen .

The proper 20/20 prescription below is needed to rightly divide the parables.it should be applied if we desire to hear what the Spirit says to the churches or believers.

2 Corinthians 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

Christ simply used parables as another manner of prophecy in order to teach mankind how to walk by faith, the eternal not seen. And not after the temporal what the eyes see.

Mark 9 is an excellent place where the hiding of the spiritual unseen gospel seed in parables. Three times Jesus gives the gospel in a parable purposely hiding the meaning from mankind ( no faith) After the third time (three denotes the end of a matter) he rebuked the apostles and said .You know not what manner of spirit you are of.

After the first time the apostles became so confused that the natural Alfa male dog spirit kicked in as to "Who is the Greatest" . Having impeached the greatest Jesus stood two feet from them . They eventually did learn how to hear the word of God through the parables without losing historical value as the other manner of spirit.

55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#49
If you are a Dispensationalist, you can not afford to agree. It blows the two people's scheme completely away.
Rather as a Bible believing born again Christian, I can't agree with your eschatology.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#50
Rather as a Bible believing born again Christian, I can't agree with your eschatology.
If you are a Dispensationalist you have a different eschatology than the Church ever had. And it is less than 200 years old.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,773
113
#51
The church was believers and unbelievers under the Old Covenant.
You have confused Israel and the Church. Dave you need to go back to square one, and unlearn all that you have been taught.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#52
You have confused Israel and the Church. Dave you need to go back to square one, and unlearn all that you have been taught.
You need to submit to scripture.

“This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:” Acts 7:38 (KJV 1900)
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#53
If you are a Dispensationalist you have a different eschatology than the Church ever had. And it is less than 200 years old.
I take the Scriptures more literal than most Amillennialists, Preterists, Postmillennialists etc. Through that approach I let the chips fall where they may, whether it be what you call Dispensationalism or whatever. The Scriptures are much less confusing that way. You ought to try it sometime. LOL
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#54
I take the Scriptures more literal than most Amillennialists, Preterists, Postmillennialists etc. Through that approach I let the chips fall where they may, whether it be what you call Dispensationalism or whatever. The Scriptures are much less confusing that way. You ought to try it sometime. LOL
Why? because Dispies cannot discern the spiritual kingdom and walk by sight thinking the kingdom is physical and future. = they don't have to deal with it. That's why they exist. Just like the Pharisees don't have to deal with it and killed Christ because he said it was here and they couldn't see it.
“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” John 3:3 (KJV 1900)
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,773
113
#55
“This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:” Acts 7:38 (KJV 1900)
That simply means the assembly of Israelites in the wilderness, since the Greek word ekklesia basically means assembly.

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 1577: ἐκκλησία (ekklesia)

2. in the Sept. often equivalent to קָהָל, the assembly of the Israelites, Judges 21:8; 1 Chronicles 29:1, etc., especially when gathered for sacred purposes, Deuteronomy 31:30(Deuteronomy 32:1); Joshua 8:35 (Joshua 9:8), etc.; in the N. T. thus in Acts 7:38; Hebrews 2:12.


As we know from the Torah, the majority of those Israelites failed to believe God, and perished in the wilderness. They were unbelievers. So the KJV translators really should not have used the word "church" to confuse people.

NIV, NLT, -- assembly
ESV, NKJV, NASB, HCSB -- congregation
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#56
That simply means the assembly of Israelites in the wilderness, since the Greek word ekklesia basically means assembly.

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 1577: ἐκκλησία (ekklesia)

2. in the Sept. often equivalent to קָהָל, the assembly of the Israelites, Judges 21:8; 1 Chronicles 29:1, etc., especially when gathered for sacred purposes, Deuteronomy 31:30(Deuteronomy 32:1); Joshua 8:35 (Joshua 9:8), etc.; in the N. T. thus in Acts 7:38; Hebrews 2:12.

As we know from the Torah, the majority of those Israelites failed to believe God, and perished in the wilderness. They were unbelievers. So the KJV translators really should not have used the word "church" to confuse people.

NIV, NLT, -- assembly
ESV, NKJV, NASB, HCSB -- congregation
No footwork needed. It says the Church in the wilderness.
Church = ③ people with shared belief, community, congregation (for common identity, cp. the community of Pythagoras [Hermippus in Diog. L. 8, 41]. Remarkably, in Himerius, Or. 39 [Or. 5], 5 Orpheus forms for himself τὴν ἐκκλησίαν, a group of wild animals, who listen to him, in the Thracian mountains where there are no people), in our lit. of common interest in the God of Israel.

ⓐ of OT Israelites assembly, congregation (Dt 31:30; Judg 20:2; 1 Km 17:47; 3 Km 8:14; PsSol 10:6; TestJob 32:8 τῆς εὐώδους ἐ.; Philo; Jos., Ant. 4, 309; Diod S 40, 3, 6) Hb 2:12 (Ps 21:23); e.g. to hear the law (Dt 4:10; 9:10; 18:16) Ac 7:38.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
#57
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
#58

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
#59
It's the spiritual battle against the church coming from the overwhelming amount of false doctrine now present (since the 1800s) and the world since that time. This based on the imminent return of Christ.

So you see/think the thousand years ended in the 1800's?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#60
Why? because Dispies cannot discern the spiritual kingdom and walk by sight thinking the kingdom is physical and future. = they don't have to deal with it. That's why they exist. Just like the Pharisees don't have to deal with it and killed Christ because he said it was here and they couldn't see it.
“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” John 3:3 (KJV 1900)
Yup, when all else fails, resort to ad hominems.