Biden - If you vote for me your taxes are going to be raised, not cut!
- Thread starter Whispered
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
And Trump is playing those demlib goons like a fiddle .. Trump is hilarious .. And how much wealth has been added to the US since Trump vs what was projected before the election .. Obama even said Americans would never be wealthy again with a standard of living as in the past .. LOLOL
-
1
- Show all
Here's the whole story behind Schumer's clip above. Do you all think Democrats think before they vote for a career Democrat? Or is it just a matter of party loyalty and indifference as to what their party is doing to the country?? And because it is easier to vote for the familiar name on the latest ballot, than to do the research to find out if that named one deserves another term in office.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi are fit to manage a Burger King, much less operate in the House of (our) Representatives. And during Obama's last term? Even Pelosi's own party wanted her off the Speaker's seat because she was embarrassing then. Now, under Trump, many of those same ones that wanted her out back then, put her back in the Speakers seat?
And they thought she was losing her mind back then? Maybe she shared the Kool-Aid this go around and that's why she was put back in a position her own party once said she wasn't fit to serve.
Flashback: Here's What Sen. Schumer Had to Say When Trump 'Publicly Attacked' Judges
Julio Rosas Posted: Mar 04, 2020
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sang a different tune about attacks on judges when President Trump criticized the judge who was overseeing the case of his friend and Republican political operative Roger Stone in February.
Schumer has come under fire after he threatened Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a rally outside of the court, as the justices were hearing arguments about a law in Louisiana requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges to local hospitals.
"I want to tell you Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch: You have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price," he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing Schumer for his words.
"Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter," Roberts said.
In turn, Schumer attacked Roberts for following "the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes."
But in February, Schumer called for Roberts to speak out against Trump's words aimed at Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
"Another example of the President's blatant contempt for the independence of the judiciary," Schumer said in a speech floor in the Senate chamber.
"Well President Trump is once again attacking a federal judge...the nation now looks again to Chief Justice Roberts to make clear to President Trump that these attacks are unacceptable," he continued.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi are fit to manage a Burger King, much less operate in the House of (our) Representatives. And during Obama's last term? Even Pelosi's own party wanted her off the Speaker's seat because she was embarrassing then. Now, under Trump, many of those same ones that wanted her out back then, put her back in the Speakers seat?
And they thought she was losing her mind back then? Maybe she shared the Kool-Aid this go around and that's why she was put back in a position her own party once said she wasn't fit to serve.
Flashback: Here's What Sen. Schumer Had to Say When Trump 'Publicly Attacked' Judges
Julio Rosas Posted: Mar 04, 2020
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sang a different tune about attacks on judges when President Trump criticized the judge who was overseeing the case of his friend and Republican political operative Roger Stone in February.
Schumer has come under fire after he threatened Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a rally outside of the court, as the justices were hearing arguments about a law in Louisiana requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges to local hospitals.
"I want to tell you Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch: You have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price," he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing Schumer for his words.
"Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter," Roberts said.
In turn, Schumer attacked Roberts for following "the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes."
But in February, Schumer called for Roberts to speak out against Trump's words aimed at Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
"Another example of the President's blatant contempt for the independence of the judiciary," Schumer said in a speech floor in the Senate chamber.
"Well President Trump is once again attacking a federal judge...the nation now looks again to Chief Justice Roberts to make clear to President Trump that these attacks are unacceptable," he continued.
I can't wait to see the next ''Trump wins again'' that happens several times a day since he announced he would run .. I've had to remind folks over and over for 2/3 yrs to not get worried , just pray, relax, wait and watch the show .. LOLOL
-
1
- Show all
There are die hard Democrats that will always hate Republicans. Under Trump it is abundantly clear that the Democrats are making new history as Obstructionists, Seditionists, and disruption of the peace, when they abandon their responsibilities to the country so as to formulate more and more lies and pursue investigations that have no actual merit, just so as to attack the current President, and weaken the nation due to the distraction their efforts afford the entire Legislative branch.
Arrest the lot of them! Not that long ago there was an article that made a rather good argument in making the observation the Democrats in the Capitol are being manipulated by Demons. Many scoffed. And yet, it is entirely possible given their track record to date since Trump, a Christian , a Patriot, and a man dedicated to rebuilding the America the past Democrats and current one's in the Legislative branch, seek to destroy. And would have should HRC have gotten the highest office as planned.
Pray for America! Agents of Satan likely operate on the Left side of the aisle in the House and Senate.
And if you happen to find a grassroots movement dedicated to pursuing the Democrats Constitutional violation of Article 1 section 6, as in arrest and prosecution, link it to this thread, or better yet, make one so as to bring it to everyone's attention.
Arrest the lot of them! Not that long ago there was an article that made a rather good argument in making the observation the Democrats in the Capitol are being manipulated by Demons. Many scoffed. And yet, it is entirely possible given their track record to date since Trump, a Christian , a Patriot, and a man dedicated to rebuilding the America the past Democrats and current one's in the Legislative branch, seek to destroy. And would have should HRC have gotten the highest office as planned.
Pray for America! Agents of Satan likely operate on the Left side of the aisle in the House and Senate.
And if you happen to find a grassroots movement dedicated to pursuing the Democrats Constitutional violation of Article 1 section 6, as in arrest and prosecution, link it to this thread, or better yet, make one so as to bring it to everyone's attention.
-
1
- Show all
There are die hard Democrats that will always hate Republicans. Under Trump it is abundantly clear that the Democrats are making new history as Obstructionists, Seditionists, and disruption of the peace, when they abandon their responsibilities to the country so as to formulate more and more lies and pursue investigations that have no actual merit, just so as to attack the current President, and weaken the nation due to the distraction their efforts afford the entire Legislative branch.
Arrest the lot of them! Not that long ago there was an article that made a rather good argument in making the observation the Democrats in the Capitol are being manipulated by Demons. Many scoffed. And yet, it is entirely possible given their track record to date since Trump, a Christian , a Patriot, and a man dedicated to rebuilding the America the past Democrats and current one's in the Legislative branch, seek to destroy. And would have should HRC have gotten the highest office as planned.
Pray for America! Agents of Satan likely operate on the Left side of the aisle in the House and Senate.
And if you happen to find a grassroots movement dedicated to pursuing the Democrats Constitutional violation of Article 1 section 6, as in arrest and prosecution, link it to this thread, or better yet, make one so as to bring it to everyone's attention.
Arrest the lot of them! Not that long ago there was an article that made a rather good argument in making the observation the Democrats in the Capitol are being manipulated by Demons. Many scoffed. And yet, it is entirely possible given their track record to date since Trump, a Christian , a Patriot, and a man dedicated to rebuilding the America the past Democrats and current one's in the Legislative branch, seek to destroy. And would have should HRC have gotten the highest office as planned.
Pray for America! Agents of Satan likely operate on the Left side of the aisle in the House and Senate.
And if you happen to find a grassroots movement dedicated to pursuing the Democrats Constitutional violation of Article 1 section 6, as in arrest and prosecution, link it to this thread, or better yet, make one so as to bring it to everyone's attention.
Here's the whole story behind Schumer's clip above. Do you all think Democrats think before they vote for a career Democrat? Or is it just a matter of party loyalty and indifference as to what their party is doing to the country?? And because it is easier to vote for the familiar name on the latest ballot, than to do the research to find out if that named one deserves another term in office.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi are fit to manage a Burger King, much less operate in the House of (our) Representatives. And during Obama's last term? Even Pelosi's own party wanted her off the Speaker's seat because she was embarrassing then. Now, under Trump, many of those same ones that wanted her out back then, put her back in the Speakers seat?
And they thought she was losing her mind back then? Maybe she shared the Kool-Aid this go around and that's why she was put back in a position her own party once said she wasn't fit to serve.
Flashback: Here's What Sen. Schumer Had to Say When Trump 'Publicly Attacked' Judges
Julio Rosas Posted: Mar 04, 2020
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sang a different tune about attacks on judges when President Trump criticized the judge who was overseeing the case of his friend and Republican political operative Roger Stone in February.
Schumer has come under fire after he threatened Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a rally outside of the court, as the justices were hearing arguments about a law in Louisiana requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges to local hospitals.
"I want to tell you Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch: You have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price," he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing Schumer for his words.
"Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter," Roberts said.
In turn, Schumer attacked Roberts for following "the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes."
But in February, Schumer called for Roberts to speak out against Trump's words aimed at Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
"Another example of the President's blatant contempt for the independence of the judiciary," Schumer said in a speech floor in the Senate chamber.
"Well President Trump is once again attacking a federal judge...the nation now looks again to Chief Justice Roberts to make clear to President Trump that these attacks are unacceptable," he continued.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi are fit to manage a Burger King, much less operate in the House of (our) Representatives. And during Obama's last term? Even Pelosi's own party wanted her off the Speaker's seat because she was embarrassing then. Now, under Trump, many of those same ones that wanted her out back then, put her back in the Speakers seat?
And they thought she was losing her mind back then? Maybe she shared the Kool-Aid this go around and that's why she was put back in a position her own party once said she wasn't fit to serve.
Flashback: Here's What Sen. Schumer Had to Say When Trump 'Publicly Attacked' Judges
Julio Rosas Posted: Mar 04, 2020
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sang a different tune about attacks on judges when President Trump criticized the judge who was overseeing the case of his friend and Republican political operative Roger Stone in February.
Schumer has come under fire after he threatened Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a rally outside of the court, as the justices were hearing arguments about a law in Louisiana requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges to local hospitals.
"I want to tell you Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch: You have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price," he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing Schumer for his words.
"Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter," Roberts said.
In turn, Schumer attacked Roberts for following "the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes."
But in February, Schumer called for Roberts to speak out against Trump's words aimed at Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
"Another example of the President's blatant contempt for the independence of the judiciary," Schumer said in a speech floor in the Senate chamber.
"Well President Trump is once again attacking a federal judge...the nation now looks again to Chief Justice Roberts to make clear to President Trump that these attacks are unacceptable," he continued.
Here's the whole story behind Schumer's clip above. Do you all think Democrats think before they vote for a career Democrat? Or is it just a matter of party loyalty and indifference as to what their party is doing to the country?? And because it is easier to vote for the familiar name on the latest ballot, than to do the research to find out if that named one deserves another term in office.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi are fit to manage a Burger King, much less operate in the House of (our) Representatives. And during Obama's last term? Even Pelosi's own party wanted her off the Speaker's seat because she was embarrassing then. Now, under Trump, many of those same ones that wanted her out back then, put her back in the Speakers seat?
And they thought she was losing her mind back then? Maybe she shared the Kool-Aid this go around and that's why she was put back in a position her own party once said she wasn't fit to serve.
Flashback: Here's What Sen. Schumer Had to Say When Trump 'Publicly Attacked' Judges
Julio Rosas Posted: Mar 04, 2020
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sang a different tune about attacks on judges when President Trump criticized the judge who was overseeing the case of his friend and Republican political operative Roger Stone in February.
Schumer has come under fire after he threatened Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a rally outside of the court, as the justices were hearing arguments about a law in Louisiana requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges to local hospitals.
"I want to tell you Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch: You have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price," he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing Schumer for his words.
"Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter," Roberts said.
In turn, Schumer attacked Roberts for following "the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes."
But in February, Schumer called for Roberts to speak out against Trump's words aimed at Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
"Another example of the President's blatant contempt for the independence of the judiciary," Schumer said in a speech floor in the Senate chamber.
"Well President Trump is once again attacking a federal judge...the nation now looks again to Chief Justice Roberts to make clear to President Trump that these attacks are unacceptable," he continued.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi are fit to manage a Burger King, much less operate in the House of (our) Representatives. And during Obama's last term? Even Pelosi's own party wanted her off the Speaker's seat because she was embarrassing then. Now, under Trump, many of those same ones that wanted her out back then, put her back in the Speakers seat?
And they thought she was losing her mind back then? Maybe she shared the Kool-Aid this go around and that's why she was put back in a position her own party once said she wasn't fit to serve.
Flashback: Here's What Sen. Schumer Had to Say When Trump 'Publicly Attacked' Judges
Julio Rosas Posted: Mar 04, 2020
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sang a different tune about attacks on judges when President Trump criticized the judge who was overseeing the case of his friend and Republican political operative Roger Stone in February.
Schumer has come under fire after he threatened Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a rally outside of the court, as the justices were hearing arguments about a law in Louisiana requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges to local hospitals.
"I want to tell you Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch: You have unleashed a whirlwind, and you will pay the price," he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing Schumer for his words.
"Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter," Roberts said.
In turn, Schumer attacked Roberts for following "the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes."
But in February, Schumer called for Roberts to speak out against Trump's words aimed at Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
"Another example of the President's blatant contempt for the independence of the judiciary," Schumer said in a speech floor in the Senate chamber.
"Well President Trump is once again attacking a federal judge...the nation now looks again to Chief Justice Roberts to make clear to President Trump that these attacks are unacceptable," he continued.
-
1
- Show all
I'll take even lower tax cuts for corporations since at least they create jobs and wealth for the country. What we really need to do is cut all subsidies for Satan's minions like the sluts. They do not need birth control, abortions, and welfare for their bastard children for making the evil choices that are against God totally.
-
1
- Show all
How stupid is it to try and go after this awful boogie man of “ corporations”. These people are either ignorant or evil. No other explanation
Corporations are comprised of human beings. My corporation for instance, employs about 30,000 people globally. Giving them a decent living to support their families.
Unless you are self employed, or working for the bloated, obese government, or are infirmed or a flat out bum, you work for a corporation made up entirely by human beings.
When you hear people go after corporations, beware! They are leftist America hating, constitution hating enemies, or completely indoctrinated ignoramousi!
Corporations are comprised of human beings. My corporation for instance, employs about 30,000 people globally. Giving them a decent living to support their families.
Unless you are self employed, or working for the bloated, obese government, or are infirmed or a flat out bum, you work for a corporation made up entirely by human beings.
When you hear people go after corporations, beware! They are leftist America hating, constitution hating enemies, or completely indoctrinated ignoramousi!
-
1
- Show all
I also own a small corporation with my cousin. I definitely wish we paid 0% taxes. Trump's tax cuts have allowed us to grow and hire some Gen Z kids, but frankly even Trump's tax cuts are not enough to go really big. I would like to see the tax rate lower and one could make a good argument against Trump that he should lower the corporate tax rate on small corporations and businesses even more. Nevertheless we're going to get the opposite with the democrats so it's kind of a moot point.
I wouldn't even care too much about a small raise in taxes, but then I look at what they spend it on and openly admit they want to spend it on. It's really disheartening when you made the right choices and walked a very narrow path and the evil children of the Devil expect you to subsidize their birth control so they can continue to resemble Babylon with all their whoredoms, their abortions, their agenda of lies, their own stupid choices to take on massive debt to be taught anti-Christianity by the colleges, pay for their foreign lovers that are here to replace my whole generation, and most egregious of them all is they want me to pay for Satan's handmaidens the ungodly single mother welfare queens and their children that they themselves turned into bastards.
I wouldn't even care too much about a small raise in taxes, but then I look at what they spend it on and openly admit they want to spend it on. It's really disheartening when you made the right choices and walked a very narrow path and the evil children of the Devil expect you to subsidize their birth control so they can continue to resemble Babylon with all their whoredoms, their abortions, their agenda of lies, their own stupid choices to take on massive debt to be taught anti-Christianity by the colleges, pay for their foreign lovers that are here to replace my whole generation, and most egregious of them all is they want me to pay for Satan's handmaidens the ungodly single mother welfare queens and their children that they themselves turned into bastards.
-
1
- Show all
Their entrenched career status in the Legislative branch is what makes them so arrogant and self assured.
Loyalists to the Left don't realize that there is no such thing a reciprocal passion on the part of those they elect.
During Bill Clinton's slimy terms in office, a serial adulterer and abuser of women there, hence "slimy terms", one of the many women he'd had an affair with gave viewers of her press conference a little insight into how Bill operates when speaking to the public. And sure enough it was true then, and it is true in fact for every Democrat currently in office.
She said, "It's not what Bill says that you should pay attention to. Rather, it is how he says it."
Like the Lewinsky scandal. There he was having his presser for some other issue and at the end of that talk, he threw in about what was then just developing as a story about the 22 year old under desk Jezebel.
"But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie. Not a single time. Never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people."
Notice the wording? Or, how he says that? I did not have sexual relations with that woman. < the period indicates an end of a sentence. And he paused after he said that, which is why it is the end of that statement. Then he says something totally out of context due to the period/end of his prior statement. "Miss Lewinsky".
There's no connection there as pertains to certain grammar rules. His remarks are ambiguous and disjointed. Miss. Lewinsky who? What?
Of course he was lying. But it was how he lied, how he said that lie, that tells us sure enough he was lying, he of course knew that, and in his wording of that "denial", he thinks we bought it. As to the last part? When he was committing adultery with her he was trusted to be going to work for the American people.
Today, the same is occurring daily. It isn't what any Democrat is saying that we should pay attention to. It is how they say it.
The Democrats on Capitol Hill are united in a soft coupe against Trump. That's illegal and they should not be able to get away with it. Much less be reelected by their loyalists who see no evil, speak no evil, and hear no evil from the Left side of the aisle. Even though it is broadcast from there or reported daily.
Loyalists to the Left don't realize that there is no such thing a reciprocal passion on the part of those they elect.
During Bill Clinton's slimy terms in office, a serial adulterer and abuser of women there, hence "slimy terms", one of the many women he'd had an affair with gave viewers of her press conference a little insight into how Bill operates when speaking to the public. And sure enough it was true then, and it is true in fact for every Democrat currently in office.
She said, "It's not what Bill says that you should pay attention to. Rather, it is how he says it."
Like the Lewinsky scandal. There he was having his presser for some other issue and at the end of that talk, he threw in about what was then just developing as a story about the 22 year old under desk Jezebel.
"But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie. Not a single time. Never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people."
Notice the wording? Or, how he says that? I did not have sexual relations with that woman. < the period indicates an end of a sentence. And he paused after he said that, which is why it is the end of that statement. Then he says something totally out of context due to the period/end of his prior statement. "Miss Lewinsky".
There's no connection there as pertains to certain grammar rules. His remarks are ambiguous and disjointed. Miss. Lewinsky who? What?
Of course he was lying. But it was how he lied, how he said that lie, that tells us sure enough he was lying, he of course knew that, and in his wording of that "denial", he thinks we bought it. As to the last part? When he was committing adultery with her he was trusted to be going to work for the American people.
Today, the same is occurring daily. It isn't what any Democrat is saying that we should pay attention to. It is how they say it.
The Democrats on Capitol Hill are united in a soft coupe against Trump. That's illegal and they should not be able to get away with it. Much less be reelected by their loyalists who see no evil, speak no evil, and hear no evil from the Left side of the aisle. Even though it is broadcast from there or reported daily.
no checks and balances, they were there own aircraft tester, in other words, an impartial government authority didn't get to check it over , just took corporates word for it that the aircraft is ready, now we find after there hundred deaths that no, its not ready at all. Just one blatant example many more. We have the same issue here and now have 7 year old apartment buildings falling down, why, because corporate check there own work and sign off on it. We had two train drivers die recently because the railroad repairs were signed of by, yep, you guessed it corporate, well the train derailed and killed the drivers, injuring many passengers as well. Yes, corporate is now in control of our daily lives.