C
cuz
Guest
was it because they thought they became gods?
was it because they trusted in the serpent more than what God had told them ?
was it because they trusted in the serpent more than what God had told them ?
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
.
Adam was created with immortality; which he lost due to eating fruit from
the forbidden tree. In other words; he became mortal. The tree of life
produces a remedy for mortality.
Well; God wanted Adam dead, so in order to assure his demise, God had to
keep Adam away from the tree of life lest he become immortal again.
_
Adam was created with immortality; which he lost due to eating fruit from
the forbidden tree. In other words; he became mortal. The tree of life
produces a remedy for mortality.
Well; God wanted Adam dead, so in order to assure his demise, God had to
keep Adam away from the tree of life lest he become immortal again.
_
Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—” therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.
(Gen 3:22-24)
(Gen 3:22-24)
Adam & eve only had life as long as they could eat the tree of life, GOD took the GARDON & tree of life from them so HE would NOT have eternal sinners,
If HE had not took the tree of life from them they would not have died.
GOD bless as HE sees fit
.
The cherubim and its sword blocked not only Adam's access to the tree of
life, but everybody else's access too; and I believe for a very practical
reason.
One of the societal problems associated with STDs is the development of
treatments for those kinds of diseases. The treatments are not bad per se;
the problem is that knowing that there's treatments emboldens people to
indulge in immorality.
In other words: had God allowed humanity continued access to the garden,
no doubt they would have included the forbidden fruit in their diets on a
regular basis because there would be little to fear from its effects due to the
ready availability of fruit from the tree of life. They would, as it's said, have
their cake and eat it too.
So, everyone was doomed to an eventual expiration no matter whether rich
or poor, young or old, male or female, righteous or unrighteous, holy or
unholy, pious or impious, vegetarian or meat eater. Even Jesus would have
eventually died of natural causes had he not been crucified. If the human
body-- as God created it --is to remain strong and healthy indefinitely, it has
got to have that tree in its diet; but not to happen because God wants
everyone to die at least once. (Heb 9:27)
_
The cherubim and its sword blocked not only Adam's access to the tree of
life, but everybody else's access too; and I believe for a very practical
reason.
One of the societal problems associated with STDs is the development of
treatments for those kinds of diseases. The treatments are not bad per se;
the problem is that knowing that there's treatments emboldens people to
indulge in immorality.
In other words: had God allowed humanity continued access to the garden,
no doubt they would have included the forbidden fruit in their diets on a
regular basis because there would be little to fear from its effects due to the
ready availability of fruit from the tree of life. They would, as it's said, have
their cake and eat it too.
So, everyone was doomed to an eventual expiration no matter whether rich
or poor, young or old, male or female, righteous or unrighteous, holy or
unholy, pious or impious, vegetarian or meat eater. Even Jesus would have
eventually died of natural causes had he not been crucified. If the human
body-- as God created it --is to remain strong and healthy indefinitely, it has
got to have that tree in its diet; but not to happen because God wants
everyone to die at least once. (Heb 9:27)
_
C
cuz
Guest
C
cuz
Guest
do you think it was good that they became wise ?
if so why did God keep them from eating it
just asking by the way
C
cuz
Guest
well i agree it was love that placed them out side the garden untill God could redeem what he had lost .
Does God accepted the same heart today as the heart adam and eve had then ? wounders
thank for posting
C
cuz
Guest
i do agree with you
but what caused it ? was it eve that believed an animal over the word of God ?
was it that adam followed eve even though he knew better ?
was it that there state was changed ?and now being the image of God
yet there eye open to evil did they know evil or become evil ?
what made them slaves to sin ?
rom 1:28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
Where does the text say 'they became wise'? Seems to me they lacked the wisdom to act on the knowledge of good and evil. Perhaps Paul laments a similar plight...do you think it was good that they became wise ?
if so why did God keep them from eating it
just asking by the way
Romans 7:18-23 ESV
[18] For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. [19] For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. [20] Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me. [21] So I find it to be a law that when I want to do right, evil lies close at hand. [22] For I delight in the law of God, in my inner being, [23] but I see in my members another law waging war against the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members.
Before Adam and Eve sinned they had it good, and easy, and simple, only having to dress the garden, light work, food provided for them in abundance, perfect weather conditions, having pleasant conversations with God at a friends level not having to do things commanded by God as people after them for all was well, and Adam and Eve and animals not fearing each other, and insects not bothering them all provided by God because they had a relationship with Him.
But when they sinned all that was over and they would not get to have it easy anymore but would have to labor for their food which would concern work harder than what they had in the garden not only physical labor but the conditions of the soil too.
And women would suffer labor having children, and there would be no more perfect weather conditions at times, and the people later on that God dealt with had to labor as He commanded them to do certain things, and reach out to people where Adam and Eve only had to stay away from one tree.
Also the tree of life that was in the garden could not be eaten anymore by them which is why God protected it by Cherubims, and a flaming sword for if they had eaten of it after they sinned they would of stayed that way with no reversal and then salvation could not come upon them or their children.
Which is why the world does not get it like the garden of Eden because of their sinful condition.
They were driven out of the garden because they sinned eating of the tree that God commanded them not to eat.
C
cuz
Guest
C
cuz
Guest
[QUOTE="MattforJesus, post:
Also the tree of life that was in the garden could not be eaten anymore by them which is why God protected it by Cherubims, and a flaming sword for if they had eaten of it after they sinned they would of stayed that way with no reversal and then salvation could not come upon them or their children.
Which is why the world does not get it like the garden of Eden because of their sinful condition.
They were driven out of the garden because they sinned eating of the tree that God commanded them not to eat.
[/QUOTE]
i agree with the first part
but i have to question the 2nd
(They were driven out of the garden because they sinned eating of the tree that God commanded them not to eat.)
was it trusting in other things
or was it eating of the fruit
i ask this only because today here and now what is sin
is it not trusting in God ?
or is it a act ?
i have to ponder that
thx for your response
Also the tree of life that was in the garden could not be eaten anymore by them which is why God protected it by Cherubims, and a flaming sword for if they had eaten of it after they sinned they would of stayed that way with no reversal and then salvation could not come upon them or their children.
Which is why the world does not get it like the garden of Eden because of their sinful condition.
They were driven out of the garden because they sinned eating of the tree that God commanded them not to eat.
[/QUOTE]
i agree with the first part
but i have to question the 2nd
(They were driven out of the garden because they sinned eating of the tree that God commanded them not to eat.)
was it trusting in other things
or was it eating of the fruit
i ask this only because today here and now what is sin
is it not trusting in God ?
or is it a act ?
i have to ponder that
thx for your response
C
cuz
Guest
I understand they did wrong
but what was the wrong they did ?
how hard was it to convince them to eat the fruit ?
I would think they had Gods nature on them
so some thing had to click,change eve even told the serpent
gen 3:2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.
she knew to do right .
why did her trust fall?
4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.
but what was the wrong they did ?
how hard was it to convince them to eat the fruit ?
I would think they had Gods nature on them
so some thing had to click,change eve even told the serpent
gen 3:2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.
she knew to do right .
why did her trust fall?
4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.
WRONG. God was there with them, as was the serpent satan.. Nowadays the ONLY thing in the garden is the cherubim with the flaming sword..
Satan the serpent AND are not people. And it don't say that it kept them out of the Garden. It was to keep Adam & Eve the tree of LIFE, GOD bless as HE sees fit.
Perhaps this will help you have a better understanding of the narrative.
By oldhermit
As we move from creation to the garden, there develops an emerging discontinuity between man and his association with forbidden things. When man is unconstrained by revelation, he quite naturally draws conclusions based upon how he relates to the world around him. Man allows what he experiences to influence how he defines what is relevant. Once man learns to link the natural to the eternal, he learns to represent human events in quite a different way. One cannot build a triadic picture of reality based upon experiential logic. Human rationalization, operating on its own, cannot properly context the relationship of man to the natural world. Building a triadic picture of reality is only possible when one learns to represent human experience in the light of revelation. To do this, one must allow revelation to transcend experiential logic.
There is an example of triadic structure that demonstrates how the natural world and the supernatural world relate to one another in the eternal continuum. At the beginning of man’s history in the garden, the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil were mentioned in the context of man’s relationship both to God and to the natural world. The text never seems to indicate that in the beginning there was any prohibition to the tree of life but, that man was only denied access to the tree of knowledge. It was not until after the fall of man that God placed an angel with a flaming sword at the east of the garden to prohibit man’s access to the tree of life.
The way in which Adam chose to represent these trees would reflect his understanding of his association with both God and the natural world. As the narrative unfolds, it becomes clear that access to the tree of life was predicated upon man’s observance of the divine prohibition of the other. Man was to have absolutely no contact with the tree of knowledge. God had provided every tree of the garden for man’s use and pleasure, but this tree was to be left strictly alone. These two trees stand as symbols of a world beyond man’s sensory existence. The tree of forbidden knowledge represents the holiness, the superiority, and the sovereignty of God. It suggests that God always reserves unto Himself the things that belong exclusively to him. It is not merely the tree that has exclusivity, but what that tree represents. As a whole, man is never content to abide by prohibitions. Here, he desires the one thing he is denied. How characteristic this has proven to be of human nature!
Although man was given the highest place of honor as the crowning creation of God, and given dominion over all creation, this tree was a reminder that even man is not God. Man must stand in the index position of this triad and link the tree of knowledge that he can see to the will of God whom he cannot see. He must also link this tree to revealed consequences that he cannot see and has never before experienced. For man to properly relate to both worlds, he must learn to link the eternal world to his world by bringing God’s warning to bear upon his relationship to this tree. He must learn how to define the nature of his relationship to this tree based on what God had told him about it. Now, this epistemology did not just apply to this tree, it extended to everything in man’s dominion. He must understand his relationship to all of his domain based upon this triadic epistemology. God had already defined man’s function in creation and man must relate to his world according to the words of the Lord.
From the beginning, man was confronted with a decision in his association with this icon of good and evil. This tree was a symbol of an unseen reality. There is a particular type of knowledge that man was not equipped to handle and should not seek to obtain. The accessibility of the tree shows that man was given the ability to obtain this knowledge. The prohibition laid down by God says that this knowledge is destructive to man. This reinforces man’s position as a subordinate creature to what is unseen. God had said, “From this tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shalt not eat of it; for in the day that you eat from it, you shall surely die.” Here is a divine standard given to instruct man on how to think when he considers this tree. Since God has decreed that punishment will follow disobedience, the validity of God’s word is upheld. Divine judgment preserves divine justice because it is through the exercise of justice that God protects his holiness. Observance of this revelation becomes a matter of life and death. The ethics were simple; God said, “Don’t touch it.” This did not require a human analysis of ethics to decide what might be the right thing to do. Contact with the tree was evil both because God said it was evil, and because of what man would suffer as a result.