BLOOMBERG

[p_rehbein]

Here in Bama where I live, Bloomberg is running a TV Ad saying he was responsible for rebuilding NYC after 911, and that his Mayoral Term was responsible for the great reduction in crime in NYC.

SERIOUSLY?

I mean, seriously? Does no one remember Rudy? Or what he accomplished as Mayor before and AFTER 911?

Have to wonder why no one in the Media, not even FOX is disputing his claims........... hmm

 

[Nehemiah6]

Have to wonder why no one in the Media, not even FOX is disputing his claims........... hmm

FOX has joined the MSM (with Paul Ryan leading the anti-Trumpers), and the MSM are joined at the hip with the Democrats. No matter how outrageous their claims or lies, they will never be questioned by the propaganda wing of the Democratic party (represented by all the networks).

And now once again the New York Times is pushing the false narrative that the Russians are helping Trump to be re-elected! It's time for people to be prosecuted for all their lies and false propaganda. But the Attorney General is not strong enough to clean house and then begin the prosecutions.

As to Bloomberg, he believes he will purchase the nomination with his billions, and he may even give Bernie a few million (or a billion) to hand it over to him. The real issue (which does not seem to be on anyone's radar) is the MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL VOTES which the Democrats will garner because the matter is not being rigorously addressed by the GOP and Trump.

 

[bojack]

I'm gonna sit back and enjoy watching the rest of this demlib/RINO implosion show, I have so far . Bernie might sell out but his supporters will fracture the democrats in half .. I've heard that the voting machine tampering has been exposed and somehow some tied up in with the Ukraine with one of the Awan brothers hands all over it .. I predict President Trump will win with at least 400 or more electoral votes in 2020 .. MAGA

 

[7seasrekeyed]

Here in Bama where I live, Bloomberg is running a TV Ad saying he was responsible for rebuilding NYC after 911, and that his Mayoral Term was responsible for the great reduction in crime in NYC.

SERIOUSLY?

I mean, seriously? Does no one remember Rudy? Or what he accomplished as Mayor before and AFTER 911?

Have to wonder why no one in the Media, not even FOX is disputing his claims........... hmm

and Obama is taking credit for the economy

FOX is slowly but surely edging towards the cliff of libtard nonsense

management seems to be feeding their regulars as to what type of questioning to 'control' those they interview...they all start to sound like Chris Wallace who gets angry if the leading questions he asks are not replied to as he would like

there are a few of course who are on later at night and the 5 show can hold their own as well as the one at noon, but they allow the leftists to spew actual lies and allow them to interrupt conservatives speaking and then they call this all fair and balanced...it isn't fair and as for balanced, do we really need to hear a pack of lies and agenda shoving for balance? I think not

thanks for giving some room for me to rant

 

[7seasrekeyed]

FOX has joined the MSM (with Paul Ryan leading the anti-Trumpers), and the MSM are joined at the hip with the Democrats. No matter how outrageous their claims or lies, they will never be questioned by the propaganda wing of the Democratic party (represented by all the networks).

And now once again the New York Times is pushing the false narrative that the Russians are helping Trump to be re-elected! It's time for people to be prosecuted for all their lies and false propaganda. But the Attorney General is not strong enough to clean house and then begin the prosecutions.

As to Bloomberg, he believes he will purchase the nomination with his billions, and he may even give Bernie a few million (or a billion) to hand it over to him. The real issue (which does not seem to be on anyone's radar) is the MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL VOTES which the Democrats will garner because the matter is not being rigorously addressed by the GOP and Trump.

I am finding the way voting is handled in this country to be a major concern. major

we are far stricter in Canada

I wonder if Bernie would receive anything from Bloomberg though...Bloomberg would not benefit from Bernie little soiree into communism

it is also really disappointing the Dems just change 'the rules' to allow whatever comes along and might benefit them

the ex PM of Canada, Harper, was on FOX business this am and you could about cry when you see what they replaced that man with up in Canada

 

[gb9]

stay away from t.v. news. it is all bought and paid for propaganda.

try zero hedge, daily caller , breitbart, all good sources of news.

 

[p_rehbein]

It appears Bloomberg is an enigma. He was a Republican when he was Mayor of NY, and spent millions to help keep Republicans in Congress.........now he is running as a Democrat in hopes of becoming President.

His TV Ads here keep touting that he led NYC through the aftermath of 911 though, and I'm searching that to see why no one is disputing his claim.

He can't run as a Republican because he would have to fight Trump for the nomination, and he wouldn't win that fight IMO. So he changes his Party..........but, then, Sanders is now the front runner among the Democrats seeking the nomination, and he isn't a Democrat either! He is a Socialist Independent.

The Democrats keep harping on Trumps Administration being discombobulated, yet their own Party surely is!

 

[p_rehbein]

Clint Eastwood (for what it's worth) has left the Trump Camp in support of Bloomberg.

(just saying)

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/clint-eastwood-ditches-donald-trump-173420544.html

 

[JeremiahsCup]

Here in Bama where I live, Bloomberg is running a TV Ad saying he was responsible for rebuilding NYC after 911, and that his Mayoral Term was responsible for the great reduction in crime in NYC.

SERIOUSLY?

I mean, seriously? Does no one remember Rudy? Or what he accomplished as Mayor before and AFTER 911?

Have to wonder why no one in the Media, not even FOX is disputing his claims........... hmm

Expect much pandering. I do like that you retain the knowledge of Rudy's good work though and you are correct that really it was Giuliani that was most responsible for the strong leadership in the face of 9/11. In fairness to Bloomberg though he did actually reduce crime significantly with his Stop and Frisk policy, yet hilariously this actually decent policy of his he has to walk back because apparently being tough on crime doesn't play too well to the Democrat faithful.

 

[gb9]

Expect much pandering. I do like that you retain the knowledge of Rudy's good work though and you are correct that really it was Giuliani that was most responsible for the strong leadership in the face of 9/11. In fairness to Bloomberg though he did actually reduce crime significantly with his Stop and Frisk policy, yet hilariously this actually decent policy of his he has to walk back because apparently being tough on crime doesn't play too well to the Democrat faithful.

yea, it does not fit with the " everything is racist" platform of the dems...

 

[JeremiahsCup]

yea, it does not fit with the " everything is racist" platform of the dems...

Yea I guess if you don't support stop and frisk, which has provably drastically reduced the rate of murder, that you must admit that black lives just don't really matter to you.

 

[gb9]

Yea I guess if you don't support stop and frisk, which has provably drastically reduced the rate of murder, that you must admit that black lives just don't really matter to you.

it seems that black lives matter to them only when they need to push a narrative, or win an election.

 

[JeremiahsCup]

it seems that black lives matter to them only when they need to push a narrative, or win an election.

I would disagree, you would think if that were true they would support policies that have demonstrably saved black lives.

 

[gb9]

I would disagree, you would think if that were true they would support policies that have demonstrably saved black lives.

good point. I see what you mean

 

[Whispered]

Clint Eastwood (for what it's worth) has left the Trump Camp in support of Bloomberg.

(just saying)

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/clint-eastwood-ditches-donald-trump-173420544.html

Yes, well, Clint is an actor. And after he carried on a conversation with an empty chair, I'd say President Trump is the lucky one.

Michael Bloomberg claims he brought New York back after 9-11? Where did it go?
Rudy Giuliani was Mayor of NYC for nearly four months after September 11th. I'm surprised Bloomberg didn't claim it was a joint effort.

Bloomberg defended what was called the "Ground Zero Mosque" in the name of Tolerance when it was to be built just a few blocks from ground zero. Bloomberg was part of the opening day ceremonies for the 9-11 memorial. Then at the 10th anniversary ceremonies it was discovered he band any clergy from being part of the ceremonies.
A Republican turned Democrat isn't a surprise given his flip flop there. Though in fairness President Trump changed parties quite often before he returned to being a Republican so as to run for highest office. He was bad for NYC and he'll be a nightmare for America if he got the Presidency.

And at least Donald Trump sought to buy the land where the so called Ground Zero Mosque was to be constructed. It would have stood just blocks from ground zero. He didn't buy the land and the plans were shelved but as of 2019 they're allegedly back in play. Make another try Mr. President! This time you may get it.


November 25, 2019
Bloomberg’s Scandals Ignored or Underplayed by Press Cheerleaders

More:Bloomberg scandals

 

[Smoke]

Expect much pandering. I do like that you retain the knowledge of Rudy's good work though and you are correct that really it was Giuliani that was most responsible for the strong leadership in the face of 9/11. In fairness to Bloomberg though he did actually reduce crime significantly with his Stop and Frisk policy, yet hilariously this actually decent policy of his he has to walk back because apparently being tough on crime doesn't play too well to the Democrat faithful.

It is absolutely absurd of you to think that New York City's stop and frisk policy was "actually [a] decent policy". NYC was unconstitutional with how they implemented it, and it ought to be a poop stain on his resume as mayor for both parties.

This is why I can't stand either political party... Both sides sell out their individual liberty for a false small sense of security. If you think it's okay to break someone's civil rights because it "reduces crime", then perhaps you don't fully appreciation or understand what liberty is all about. It's just as ludicrous as the line of thinking that if citizens give up their guns, the country will be safer... Sorry, my individual liberty is more important than your false sense of safety...

 

[JeremiahsCup]

It is absolutely absurd of you to think that New York City's stop and frisk policy was "actually [a] decent policy". NYC was unconstitutional with how they implemented it, and it ought to be a poop stain on his resume as mayor for both parties.

This is why I can't stand either political party... Both sides sell out their individual liberty for a false small sense of security. If you think it's okay to break someone's civil rights because it "reduces crime", then perhaps you don't fully appreciation or understand what liberty is all about. It's just as ludicrous as the line of thinking that if citizens give up their guns, the country will be safer... Sorry, my individual liberty is more important than your false sense of safety...

The Stop and Frisk policy provably cut crime, particularly the murder rate which is of course an egregious crime, but also is useful in catching and deterring criminals like drug dealers and lowkey gangbangers and people that own illegal guns and foreigners.

You'll find the sort of people that were stopped and frisked are not exactly ideal citizens, if they were even citizens at all. Civil rights are for the civilized and I would contend the vast majority of those stopped and frisked are not civilized they just want a free pass to commit high crimes with impunity. Understand that stop and frisk was not done willy nilly to every single person. This is no NWO police state conspiracy theory, but the policy was done intelligently in specifically targeted areas and targeting largely the criminal people to great effect. In more plain talk, they stop and frisked the ghettoes and slums and the scum that crawl around in them and helped clean up those hellholes with tangible results.

The citizen deserves to not be murdered or assaulted or poisoned by a combination of a bunch of savages and foreign interlopers. This is where Bloomberg was right, though he was weak and tries to downplay it on public TV to pander to the degenerate party, that the citizen's foremost God ordained right is a right to live and in relative peace.

 

[Whispered]

It is absolutely absurd of you to think that New York City's stop and frisk policy was "actually [a] decent policy". NYC was unconstitutional with how they implemented it, and it ought to be a poop stain on his resume as mayor for both parties.

This is why I can't stand either political party... Both sides sell out their individual liberty for a false small sense of security. If you think it's okay to break someone's civil rights because it "reduces crime", then perhaps you don't fully appreciation or understand what liberty is all about. It's just as ludicrous as the line of thinking that if citizens give up their guns, the country will be safer... Sorry, my individual liberty is more important than your false sense of safety...

Yes, the Constitutional rights of thugs must be upheld. While stop and mug, rape, beat the crap out of, by thugs that prowled NYC wasn't Constitutional but the gang and criminal element didn't give a flying flip about citizens rights. They wanted everything the working class had. In their pockets, in their purse, around their neck, on their hand. And would even go so far as to cut off a finger if the ring didn't slide off easily.

Yes, civil rights of thugs are what's priority. Uh huh.

 

[posthuman]

It appears Bloomberg is an enigma. He was a Republican when he was Mayor of NY, and spent millions to help keep Republicans in Congress.........now he is running as a Democrat in hopes of becoming President.

i'm kinda suspicious that his intent is nothing more than to split the DNC vote. no way is he going to be their nominee, but he's spending his own billions, like Perot did, and i doubt he's going to stop after the primaries.

 

[Nehemiah6]

It appears Bloomberg is an enigma. He was a Republican when he was Mayor of NY, and spent millions to help keep Republicans in Congress.........now he is running as a Democrat in hopes of becoming President.

Bloomberg is not really an enigma. He is just like Soros, Steyer, Gates, Zuckerberg, and other unprincipled billionaires. They all believe that they should use their wealth to destroy America -- which gave them their wealth -- and what it stands for. They want to see the world enslaved one way or another.

So they are all essentially destroyers (just like Obama, Clinton, Sanders, Castro, Stalin, Lenin, etc), working for the greatest Destroyer* of all -- Satan. He is the puppet master behind all these billionaires, who like the Rothschilds, and a small cabal of extremely wealthy Jews, are on earth to destroy societies, send souls to Hell, and bring in the New World Order. With the Antichrist in control, who is also controlled by Satan.

*Note: Apollyon (Greek) or Abaddon (Hebrew) means Destroyer.