L
little children is one thing...infants are another
I was actually 'baptized' myself as an infant in the Lutheran church...but that is just a sprinkling...have you ever heard of or seen an infant completely immersed? there would be hearty objections all the way round I suspect...further, it is my understanding that sprinkling came about because of infant 'baptism' to begin with...I wouldn't bet the family farm on that one in particular cause I have not researched it...but sounds plausible
I was 'saved' at the age of 5 so it seems I would fit into the category of 'little children'. but I was baptized as an early teen and I made that decision of my own accord and understood what it meant
frankly, I have difficulty with going ahead with something that the Bible 'does not mention' using the so logic of 'well if it doesn't forbid it, it must be default allow it' or at least there is an argument to be there, and then saying it is of God..that is far more church tradition I would suspect
the disciples were baptized in the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost and since they taught baptism, they were obviously baptized at some point. IMO, it is illogical to assume otherwise in there case as they taught baptism themselves, so it would follow they were not making a case for 'do as I say and not as I do'
I was actually 'baptized' myself as an infant in the Lutheran church...but that is just a sprinkling...have you ever heard of or seen an infant completely immersed? there would be hearty objections all the way round I suspect...further, it is my understanding that sprinkling came about because of infant 'baptism' to begin with...I wouldn't bet the family farm on that one in particular cause I have not researched it...but sounds plausible
I was 'saved' at the age of 5 so it seems I would fit into the category of 'little children'. but I was baptized as an early teen and I made that decision of my own accord and understood what it meant
frankly, I have difficulty with going ahead with something that the Bible 'does not mention' using the so logic of 'well if it doesn't forbid it, it must be default allow it' or at least there is an argument to be there, and then saying it is of God..that is far more church tradition I would suspect
the disciples were baptized in the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost and since they taught baptism, they were obviously baptized at some point. IMO, it is illogical to assume otherwise in there case as they taught baptism themselves, so it would follow they were not making a case for 'do as I say and not as I do'
- 2
- 1
- Show all