The Bible interprets itself:
"That which is born of the flesh is flesh" - John 3:6
"the son by the bondwoman was born according to the flesh" - Galatians 4:23
"he who was born according to the flesh" - Galatians 4:29
It's okay if you don't get it at first.
Some things just take time.
Are you are a regular Bible reader?
You really won't see these kinds of revelations in scripture unless you read the Bible for yourself on a regular basis away from the narrow bias of popular teachings in the church today.
Lol.... how lovely.🙄
Don't be stinky just because you
know I am right and you're intimidated by sound doctrine.
You are implying born of water DOES INDEED mean born of flesh in the context of Jesus speaking in john. I agree.
But then you say "the bible interperates itself" and try to stretch born according to the flesh from one verse to mean the same as born of flesh in another.
Think for one moment fralphart101jenscoroni.....
If you say
22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Would mean what you're implying the son of promise was NOT born of flesh im the CONTEXT Jesus spake saying: You MUST be born of water (which you agree is flesh) AND of the spirit.
It would mean he is disqualified from seeing the kingdom of God because He was not "born ACCORDING to the flesh" as abrahams first son.🤦♂️