It's painfully obvious to me that you and I are NOT going to come to an agreement and I'm really getting tired of wasting my time arguing with you. I'm also convinced that you are throughly indoctrinated and unteachable, but I will respond to this post before shaking the dust off my shoes and moving on.
Yes I did check and neither the ISV, DRB, DBT, WNT, or YLT have 2 mights, but the NAB (Catholic Bible) does.
ISV - For this is how God loved the world: He gave his unique Son so that everyone who believes in him
might not be lost but have eternal life.
DRB - For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth in him,
may not perish, but
may have life everlasting.
DBT - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believes on him
may not perish, but have life eternal.
WNT - For so greatly did God love the world that He gave His only Son, that every one who trusts in Him
may not perish but
may have the Life of Ages.
YLT - for God did so love the world, that His Son -- the only begotten -- He gave, that every one who is believing in him
may not perish, but
may have life age-during.
So one translation with 1 might and three translations with 2 mays,
but still no other translation with 2 mights.
NAB -
For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him might not perish but might have eternal life. Like I said before. ONLY The NAB (Catholic Bible) translates John 3:16 with 2 mights.
I was once in a discussion with a Roman Catholic about the NAB translation and when I pointed out to him that those who truly believe in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life (NASB) he basically told me that believing "is not enough," then went on to say that believing does not diminish the role of
obedience to Christ in the process of getting to heaven. In other words, salvation is by believing
+ obedience/works according to him. He said that "justification" (instead of ongoing sanctification) is a process, which is a common error taught by works-salvationists. He also accused me of ignoring the rest of the chapter in connection with what being born of water means in John 3:5, then he said it refers to baptism, so now it's believing
+ water baptism.
This Roman Catholic was also quick to point out that in John 3:36, we read - "..but whoever
disobeys the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him" and really stressed
"disobeys the Son" to imply that we are saved by
believing + obedience/works, which should come as no surprise. -
http://www.justforcatholics.org/a14.htm It should also come as no surprise that Roman Catholicism strongly opposes osas, as do all false religions and cults that teach salvation by works.
In regards to John 3:36, "disobeys the Son or does not obey the Son" does not mean that receiving eternal life is received based on the merits of our obedience/works which follows believing in the Son, but
obey by choosing to believe in the Son. To obey the Son here is to choose to believe in the Son.
John 3:36 (HCSB) - The one who believes in the Son has eternal life, but the one who
refuses to believe in the Son will not see life; instead, the wrath of God remains on him.