What's that got to do with someone slapping you in the face?If someone hits my wife, I’m attacking in her defense.
What's that got to do with someone slapping you in the face?If someone hits my wife, I’m attacking in her defense.
Many churches as in who? All the churches I been to preach out of the whole Bible.
Yes you are. You take one phase and attribute that to something else. By trying to claim I’m denying scripture is an untruth. I reject your interpretation of it. See the difference?
Here's the passage:
21“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder, a and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ 22But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister b c will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’ d is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.
23“Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, 24leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift. - Matthew 7:21-24
The issue being addressed here is hatred and anger and strife in disunity, not calling out someone's thinking or behavior as being foolish. God does not want you to approach him in worship when you have hatred and anger in you towards others. Obedience is better than sacrifice. That applies as much today as it did at any time in history.
What's that got to do with someone slapping you in the face?
Anger "without a cause/you fool" stems from sinful motives (anger and hatred). In Matthew 5:21, Jesus said, "whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment" and in verse 22, Jesus said - "whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.." It's a heart issue.It’s not only attitude, but one actually saying you fool. And by the way, your version took out the phrase, "without a cause."
Anger "without a cause/you fool" stems from sinful motives (anger and hatred). In Matthew 5:21, Jesus said, "whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment" and in verse 22, Jesus said - "whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.." It's a heart issue.
Context, John146, context.It’s not only attitude, but one actually saying you fool.
Don't even go there with him, lol.Or do you believe you can lose your salvation by calling someone a fool?
Context, John146, context.
I don't believe that Jesus is talking about believers losing their salvation over a "heat of the moment" situation of calling someone a fool. Murder and hatred here stems from ongoing sinful motives from an unregenerate heart. In context, Jesus mentions the law and in verse 20, Jesus said - "For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven." That statement from Jesus probably came as a shock to the multitude of people who had great admiration of the scribes and Pharisees for their knowledge of the law and seeming righteousness and holiness in external observance of the law.And He's addressing the Jews, not the body of Christ. This is not Church doctrine. Or do you believe you can lose your salvation by calling someone a fool?
Me and you both.....this side of the cross and before.If someone evil attacks me, I’m employing self defense and will resist that evil.
Well first off you can't ask a question about salvation that is not theological. Salvation is a work of God and theology is the study of God. It's kind of like asking about something that I did, and saying that you are not asking about the thing that I did.I am not asking this question from a theological perspective, but instead from a matter of fact. I tend to lean towards yes, one can “Give up” their salvation.
Scripture states that salvation cannot be take from a believer, but there are passages that indicate that a person can essentially forgo this free gift of God. I have listed verses below that I believe can verify this concept:
Matthew 5:13
Matthew 3:10
Mark 4:1-20
Revaluation 3:14-19
If you agree or disagree, please feel to explain why.
Well first off you can't ask a question about salvation that is not theological. Salvation is a work of God and theology is the study of God. It's kind of like asking about something that I did, and saying that you are not asking about the thing that I did.
It could be argued that a person who is a believer could stop believing, and even renounce Christ. That however leaves the question as to whether they ever did believe. Some say no but scripture seems to affirm that some do indeed leave the faith.
We did the Q&A already. Since my time here I have come across some interesting and disturbing beliefs from so called Christians. Christ isn’t God, the Millennial Kingdom is a Jewish myth, people claiming have a different Gospel, people believe God is giving them some kind of new revelation, etc.All I’m asking you is what’s your view on the phrase gospel of the kingdom? You deny that’s even in scripture. What does the phrase represent? Simple question.
Well first off you can't ask a question about salvation that is not theological. Salvation is a work of God and theology is the study of God. It's kind of like asking about something that I did, and saying that you are not asking about the thing that I did.
It could be argued that a person who is a believer could stop believing, and even renounce Christ. That however leaves the question as to whether they ever did believe. Some say no but scripture seems to affirm that some do indeed leave the faith.
We did the Q&A already. Since my time here I have come across some interesting and disturbing beliefs from so called Christians. Christ isn’t God, the Millennial Kingdom is a Jewish myth, people claiming have a different Gospel, people believe God is giving them some kind of new revelation, etc.
This will be the last time I answer this because it has become completely unfruitful. I understand the 2 types of ministries that Jesus and Paul did. The Jews were looking for an earthly kingdom and the Gentiles need grace. The fact is we all need grace. By saying we don’t need to listen to Jesus teachings simply because Paul received a different Gospel is something I never heard before nor do I know anyone who preached it.
I hope this puts a close to this strange and yet informative conversation.
I don’t know why I still indulging this, but if your claim is true, how could Peter and the other Apostles convert 3000 in Jerusalem if they weren’t preaching the death and resurrection Gospel in Acts Chapter 2!Soooo, you agree that the gospel of the kingdom points to the Jews earthly kingdom. This is not what Paul preached. Paul taught the gospel of the grace of God. It is so obvious that these are different messages. The disciples had no clue about Paul's gospel of the d,b,r of Jesus for sins, and yet they did preach the kingdom gospel.
Just because you haven't heard this before does not make it false.
What if that person chooses not to repent?[/QUOTE
If he has been born again with spiritual life, then he will still go to heaven, even if he fails to repent before he dies a natural death. If repentance was a requirement to get eternal life, then it would be "salvation by the good works of man", and the scriptures do not uphold that as truth.