Why would any human put a Dislike on a post encouraging potential rape victims to reach out for help through friends? The discouragement and discredit of rape victims is only a product of those who encourage sex above the wellbeing of women, I sadly believe. I've read so many articles where rape victims were discouraged from reaching out. And a marriage ring does not excuse rape: rape is rape regardless if the rapist is a husband. I know some husbands don't rape their wives, but some do.
You do know there is a scripture regarding marital relations that says not to deprive one another except for fasting and prayer.
The NASB says deprive and the KJV says defraud.
The reason you get a dislike is because you are suggesting it is unreasonable for a husband to "require" intimacy or for a wife to "require" intimacy. I'll quote the NASB version (which has a bit softer language, although it does leave out fasting unfortunately)
"³The husband must fulfil his duty to his wife and likewise also the wife to her husband. ⁴The wife does not ave authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. ⁵Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control." 1 Corinthians 7:3-5.
If you'd like to look up the KJV for this one it is a little more "pointed".
So "locking yourself in a bathroom" as if he were some raging animal by default for wanting to have "relations" when the she does not does not make him a rapist. If she were consecrating herself in prayer and fasting this is by mutual consent. Otherwise either party could enforce their own will in a situation as higher than another's. Obviously if something were physically dangerous an argument could be made.
You can also understand how abuse can occur within relationships where one party or another "withholds" relations in order to punish or subjugate the other. This is unscriptural as per the above scripture. This would less commonly be seen in men toward the woman, but he could easily "
You also stated that you "won't die if you don't have sex". Can you potentially understand how this statement makes little sense in the larger argument of our mortality and what will and will not cause death in each individuals life? A myriad of factors contribute to death and only the Lord can see them all, it comes across as impractical to say that. While I would give the self-same advice to a young person that feels that they absolutely must release "tension", if one were to die from it (not through biology but from circumstantial factors) then that is in the Lord's hands. It seems impossible to say personally. I think a death maintaining celibacy would be worthy indeed and I'm certain this has occurred in our history, but that is something of another matter.
I'm glad that I read the last post that you made before replying, because you aren't too far into this lifestyle and I would be interested to hear a little more on how you have come to this decision of celibacy.
See if your posts were based on the life of a celibate and the pitfalls of one seeking to submit one's flesh in that area and rise above and commit oneself to the Lord then I would offer advise as well as ways that I have navigated around sexuality and maintaining not only personal purity (I do certainly succumb at times) but also to somehow breath fresh air in what can seem at times a "cesspit of flesh" then perhaps we could have a discussion.
VERY FEW people will ever understand that quest and I would caution you that there are occultic practices that align with asexuality as well.
If you are 100% certain that your decision is of the Lord and not a deeper work of the flesh then I would strongly encourage you to not attempt to be condescending toward others that are interested in marriage or are married (Holy matrimony ofc). This is the primary system.
It is not needed to point out where people have erred in the world, or even those that warp Holy matrimony with untamed lusts and are unregenerate masquerading as believers.
That is akin to calling the excesses that have been done throughout history in the name of Christianity as Holy.
Some rather insidious things can occur when a person forcefully disassociates sexually. That is not freedom or overcoming, that is human effort and it will crop up in other areas. I've noticed this myself in the mind. I've learned that it is unwise and dangerous to repress sexuality, but rather to address it in healthy ways, even if chastity for life is one's eventual destination. I won't get into specifics but there are times when I think similar to you (although personally and not regarding others) and all I can say is be certain that it is NOT disassociation and is indeed the Lord's doing, otherwise much like not going to the bathroom there will be some internal damage mentally and spiritually, so just bear that in mind and pray about it.
Also we are to boast in the Lord, not in our own selves. I'm not condemning you here, just read how Paul boasts of his fleshly accomplishments (he was also celibate) and says that he has reason to boast more than anyone but that's not how we as believers ought to behave. I'll try and find the scripture references and mention you so you can take a look. I'm sure you've heard it before, but I just recently heard it on a radio sermon and reminders are usually helpful.
You have not presented any examples of Godly marriages that are to be commended and I find that disturbing. I've certainly found some in my lifetime though not many that have encouraged me by my own marital standards (if and when the Lord chooses). So it's out there man, and I find that the Lord will bring those people across your path eventually. Actual units. People that are one flesh, operating in agreement with the spirit together. A covenanted holy union.
It exists and it is worth striving for and it is certainly inappropriate to condemn people who cultivate such a walk.